No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211105.0):
ID: 1054113 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> I do think we should drop drpms or make them more useful, but I don't
> think there's any security angle here. (see below)
>
> drpms work by downloading the delta, then using it + the version you
> have installed to re
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211105.0):
ID: 1054129 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211105.0):
ID: 1054145 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Has anyone tried the last kernel-5.15.0-60.fc36.
I have crashes at boot with this kernel since rc7 , with nvidia rpmfusion
drivers .
I think it's because of this fedora patch : fedora: Disable fbdev drivers and
use simpledrm instead .
I sent a bug report but still no answer .
__
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 3:43 AM Daniel Alley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > I do think we should drop drpms or make them more useful, but I don't
> > think there's any security angle here. (see below)
> >
> > drpms work by downloading th
It works ok here.
$ inxi -SG
System:Host: fedora Kernel: 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop:
GNOME 41.0
Distro: Fedora release 35 (Thirty Five)
Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] driver: nvidia v:
495.44
Display: wayland server: X.Org
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211105.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:8.45 MiB
side-tag: f36-build-side-47471
On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello Antonio,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
We are ready to push openbabel3
Thanks for your reply.
I have a GTX 1080 and 495.44 drivers.
The crash happens just after the same warning as you.
I'm running the 5.15 rc6 kernel without issue.
The boot problems started since 5.15 rc7 upgrade , and the only differences
between this versions are :
- Enable CONFIG_FAIL_
Hi everybody,
Between versions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0, the buffered-reader crate has been
relicensed from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+. Since the new license is compatible
and has fewer restrictions, I do not expect this to cause any issues.
The package version with the new license will soon be pushed as an
update
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 108/206 (x86_64), 66/141 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in
In one week (2021-11-13), or slightly later, I will build
python-starlette 0.17.0 in F36/Rawhide[1]. This release removes
deprecated GraphQL support, which is formally a breaking change.
I’ve tested rebuilding each of the following dependent packages using
starlette 0.17.0 and confirmed they a
That's a fair point, I was actually not aware that
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/drpm contained a completely separate
implementation of applydeltarpm.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
Yeah rsync would be nice for instead at least for repository refreshes. No?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 09:42, edmond pilon wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have a GTX 1080 and 495.44 drivers.
> The crash happens just after the same warning as you.
> I'm running the 5.15 rc6 kernel without issue.
> The boot problems started since 5.15 rc7 upgrade , and the only
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/7
>
> At first I was 'not again
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 02:02:11AM +0100, allan2016--- via devel wrote:
> På Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:59:15 +0200
> Adrian Reber skrev:
> > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made.
> >
> > https://src
Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
- there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays
tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually
slower than downloading the whole package (but that really vary between
different installations
On 11/6/21 15:46, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
- there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays
tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually
slower than downloading the whole package (but that really
On 11/6/21 7:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/6/21 15:46, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>> Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
>>> - there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays
>>> tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually
>>> slowe
On 11/6/21 6:47 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 3:43 AM Daniel Alley wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> I do think we should drop drpms or make them more useful, but I don't
>>> think there's any security angle here. (see be
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 2:22 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> I have almost always seen it *increase* download times,
In my experience, while the download times may
be (slightly) reduced, on a number of my (slower)
systems, the rebuild of the rpm itself took longer
then it would have taken to downl
It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a
lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data
expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a setting to turn
it of
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> I believe those need to be tied into a couple of other questions
> 1. How does any organization work with these various prominent vendors?
I doubt that this is a very useful question as stated. Even
near-peers like Red Hat itself and Ubuntu are probably corporate
On 2021-11-06 21:15, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the
world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta
rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with
high data expenses. So i feel turning it o
You are right.
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: http
27 matches
Mail list logo
