I'm currently working on updating liblcf and easyrpg-player to v0.7.0 [0,1].
As part of this new release, the liblcf library now bundles some header-only
C++ libraries [2,3].
Those are Boost-licensed, which means the package's effective license changes
from "MIT and BSD" to "MIT and BSD and Boo
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211101.0):
ID: 1049063 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
a previously submitted security update of curl. The update has reached
karma +13 since then, yet I was unable to make Bodhi push the update to
stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1d24845e93
I can
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> I read the mythbuster page, and I still don't understand if removing
> the file has any effect or not. Will there be any difference in builds
> (for package builds and end-user builds)?
As far as I understand it, linking with static libraries using libtool
will no
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:48 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
> a previously submitted security update of curl. The update has reached
> karma +13 since then, yet I was unable to make Bodhi push the update to
> stable:
>
> https:
On 11/1/21 18:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:42AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Dependencies ==
Around 2000 packages will need attendance (that is aprox 1/3 of time
of jdk11 bump, but It seems, that 1100 packages remained on jdk8)
$ repoquery -q --whatrequir
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211101.0):
ID: 1049201 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 9:14:31 AM CET Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:48 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
> > a previously submitted security update of curl. The update has reached
> > karma +13 sin
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:47:12AM +0100, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 11/1/21 18:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:42AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>== Dependencies ==
> >>Around 2000 packages will need attendance (that is aprox 1/3 of time
> >>of jdk11 bump, but It
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211101.0):
ID: 1049252 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
I'm totally noob about VPNs and NetworkManager, so forgive me if I'm
writing something wrong.
I was trying to set up a VPN to my work company network. It seems I need
to use IPSec XAuth PSK, so I found some guide in internet that says to
set up a libreswan VPN.
I'm facing several problems, first o
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which
> implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5.
>
> From what I understand, the following packages will need to be rebuilt:
>
> libc
V Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:46:28AM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> I was trying to set up a VPN to my work company network. It seems I need
> to use IPSec XAuth PSK, so I found some guide in internet that says to
> set up a libreswan VPN.
> I'm facing several problems, first of all I'm us
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which
implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5.
From what I understand, the following p
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> > > I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which
> > > implies a soname bump of liblttng
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:49:45AM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 9:14:31 AM CET Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:48 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
> > > a previously submitted security
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 21:33:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which
On 02. 11. 21 8:47, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
a previously submitted security update of curl. The update has reached
karma +13 since then, yet I was unable to make Bodhi push the update to
stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:54:47PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 21:33:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wro
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 1:58:02 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 11. 21 8:47, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
> > a previously submitted security update of curl. The update has reached
> > karma +13 since then, yet I was unable
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 13:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:46:28AM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> > I was trying to set up a VPN to my work company network. It seems I need
> > to use IPSec XAuth PSK, so I found some guide in internet that says to
> > set up a libr
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:17:28 PM CET Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 1:58:02 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 02. 11. 21 8:47, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
> > > a previously submitted security update of c
Here we go! Fedora Linux 35 is now officially released. I know I say it
every time, but: this is a good one! You'll want to get it (or upgrade)
right away.
Read the details in our Fedora Magazine article at:
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-35
or just go ahead and upgrade your syst
Il 02/11/21 13:15, Petr Pisar ha scritto:
> V Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:46:28AM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
>> I was trying to set up a VPN to my work company network. It seems I need
>> to use IPSec XAuth PSK, so I found some guide in internet that says to
>> set up a libreswan VPN.
>>
Il 02/11/21 14:43, Kamil Dudka ha scritto:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:17:28 PM CET Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 1:58:02 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 02. 11. 21 8:47, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On September 22 I submitted a Fedora 35 update of curl, which obsoleted
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply, but I noticed this change only when the rebuild
of mysql-connector-java failed.
> Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
> which breaks the build of:
mysql-connector-java has a protobuf-java BuildRequires, so unfortunately
is not buil
V Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:24:33AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> Petr,
> your message comes back quite unclear.
>
I'm sorry. I made a typo:
So the answer is that nmcli in Fedora does NOT use Openswan
> I think what you mean is that because there were multiple related
> implementations of IPsec
Hi all,
I am an employee of Red Hat, using Fedora as my main working environment.
I have tried various Linux distributions yet, even though I have never
contributed to any.
However, I have gained some experience in contributing to open-source
projects during my studies at university.
I will be m
V Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 02:08:58PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> mmm, but if I:
> $ nmcli conn add type vpn vpn-type openswan
>
> it creates a vpn of vpn-type=org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.openswan,
> while if I:
> $ nmcli conn add type vpn vpn-type libreswan
>
> it creates a vpn-typ
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 3:10:47 PM CET Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> It appears that the tests are now waived, so you can push the update to
> stable as usual.
>
> Mattia
I wish I could but it is unfortunately sill not the case:
$ bodhi updates request FEDORA-2021-1d24845e93 stable
On 02. 11. 21 15:10, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 02/11/21 14:43, Kamil Dudka ha scritto:
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:17:28 PM CET Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 1:58:02 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 11. 21 8:47, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On September 22 I submitted a Fed
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 15:31 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 11. 21 15:10, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Il 02/11/21 14:43, Kamil Dudka ha scritto:
> >> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:17:28 PM CET Kamil Dudka wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 1:58:02 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 3:37:03 PM CET Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Maybe multiple people attempting to waive test results and re-triggering
> tests while things are still pending is not a good idea?
>
> It looks like the re-triggered tests failed again, after the tests had been
> waived, overrid
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:50 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 3:37:03 PM CET Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Maybe multiple people attempting to waive test results and re-triggering
> > tests while things are still pending is not a good idea?
> >
> > It looks like the re-triggered t
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 4:19:23 PM CET Kalev Lember wrote:
> My understanding is that the test that failed and is blocking the push to
> stable is the openQA test. When I discussed a similar issue that a GNOME
> megaupdate ran into with adamw a few weeks ago, he said that the way to
> retrigge
Hello!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. Two new
commandline options were added, and several bugs were fixed. For more
info see the upstream release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-2.13
Note that this release is likely the last v2
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Zuzana Miklankova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am an employee of Red Hat, using Fedora as my main working environment.
>
> I have tried various Linux distributions yet, even though I have never
> contributed to any.
> However, I have gained some experience in c
Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231
or maybe we should request help of an proven packager
Thank you
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:02 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 16:19 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:50 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 3:37:03 PM CET Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Maybe multiple people attempting to waive test results and re-triggering
> > > tests while things are still pen
That's the reason of my confusion: Fedora doesn't ship NM plugin for openswan,
but ships libreswan and strongswan plugins. Yet, plasma-nm doesn't have an
interface to create/manage libreswan or strongswan VPNs, but it has interface
for openswan.
Creating an openswan VPN connection either in pla
Fedora also doesn't shop openswan so a plugin wouldn't be very useful.
There does seem to be a plasma-nm-strongswan though, but not one for
libreswan that I can see.
Also NetworkManager's libreswan plugin used to be called openswan
up to version 1.0.0 when it was renamed (libreswan is a fork of
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:23 PM Zuzana Miklankova wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am an employee of Red Hat, using Fedora as my main working environment.
>
> I have tried various Linux distributions yet, even though I have never
> contributed to any.
> However, I have gained some experience in contributi
The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
“GPLv3”.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraprojec
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 10:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> 3. I'm not sure why Bodhi is still not allowing the update to be
> submitted for stable even though the tests have been waived, this is
> odd. I ran the greenwave query manually and it returns (in part):
>
> "policies_satisfied": t
Hello,
I'm an undergrad student of Computer Engineering in Brazil. I use Fedora for
about a year as my only OS and I love the philosophy (and the performance) of
Fedora. Currently, I'm looking forward to being a part of the community and
contributing by supporting packages and developing. I hav
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 02:43:05PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> As a side-effect I received 49 identical e-mails from
> notificati...@fedoraproject.org
> with not very specific subject "fedmsg notification" and the following link
> inside:
"Update fedmsg notification email system" is one of the
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:30 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Further to this .
Thanks for the report on your research.
When there are enough fragile moving parts,
sooner or later something goes sideways
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-11-03 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:26:52PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
> “GPLv3”.
https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs (is this the right repo?) contains
both COPYING.GPL2 and COPYING.GPL3. How did you determine correct
license?
--
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:06 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:26:52PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
> > “GPLv3”.
>
> https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs (is this the right repo?) contains
> both COPYING.GPL2 a
Yes, exactly, this is based on an audit of actual source file licenses
via a combination of licensecheck and manual inspection.
I listed the full details in a spec file comment, but basically, the
files that are sources for the compiled binaries are either (LGPLv2 or
LGPLv3) or GPLv3, so the b
Dne 25. 10. 21 v 21:09 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
=== Why not just use the rpm database? ===
17:34:33 The main reason for this appears to be that we
need the RPM db locally to resolve build-ids to package names. But
since containers wipe /var/lib/rpm, we can't do that. So the solution
is to put the
Hi All,
Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community.
Colin Walters will be presenting on a new proposal for "CoreOS Layering".
https://github.com/coreos/enhancements/pull/7
We'll also be discussing any meeting tickets and possibly revisit our list of
high level
i
Correction in the subject: 2021-11-03
And in the Body: Time: 16:30 UTC (same as normal) on Wednesday November 3rd
On 11/2/21 10:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community.
>
> Colin Walters will be presenting on a new propo
54 matches
Mail list logo
