On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue?
Seeing "%fontmeta" in there reminds me of the unbreaking which I did back then
for adf-accanthis-fonts.
The upshot was that a packager suggested new font packaging macros which
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211023.0):
ID: 1038701 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 5/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211023.0):
ID: 1038717 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 10/24/21 00:10, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
This is what I found.
"11 hour ago"
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/nvidia-470-74-build-error-unable-to-load-the-nvidia-drm-kernel-module-modprobe-error-could-not-insert-nvidia-drm-exec-format-error/19287
Right. I posted it.
_
I don't think anyone will care about this but just in case...
OpenImageIO is the only consumer that I know of and upstream has started
the process to depreciate it. OpenVDB has been a replacement for quite some
time.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing li
randomly poking at headers, just
dnf reinstall kernel-devel
made no difference to the problem
but, complete removal/install
dnf remove kernel-devel
dnf reinstall kernel-core
dnf install kernel-devel dkms bison flex
did.
now, after nvidia install & subsequent m
Hi all.
We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide, all packages (except
chemtool that requires openbabel in runtime) have been rebuilt:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CF
Hello Antonio,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide
Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is
done in order to rebuild dependent packages?
Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x?
Thank you for all
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello Antonio,
Hi Alexander.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide
Will it be just Rawhide?
Yes.
Will you please let us know when the build is
done in order to rebuild depe
OLD: Fedora-35-20211023.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20211024.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211020.0):
ID: 1039130 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039130
ID: 1039150
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/141 (aarch64), 3/204 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1):
ID: 1038919 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
base_package_install_remove@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038919
ID: 1038929
Looks like someone has reported this bug [1] feel free to add any additional
details. I ran into this bug myself and consider it to be a pretty big problem
if 34->35 upgrades are going to leave some users without working audio.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016253
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:52 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> Looks like someone has reported this bug [1] feel free to add any additional
> details. I ran into this bug myself and consider it to be a pretty big
> problem if 34->35 upgrades are going to leave some users without working
> audio.
>
> [1
Am 19.10.21 um 17:44 schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
Any hints, please?
JFYI, pipewire has been replaced by pulseaudio on the Fedora Pinephone
Edition, because pipewire had issues with profile switching, which
pulseaudio does not have. We also had missing audio devices, which was
an interaction be
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 14:31 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19. 10. 21 v 18:30 Micah Shennum napsal(a):
> > > and when I manually run "wireplumber" it shows:
> > >
> > > Default Sink: alsa_output.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
> > > Default Source: alsa_input.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
> > >
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> > that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> > p
Sorry for the late notice - just realized I forgot to send these.
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today. It's been a
while, but we're still in F35 crunch mode this week, so nothing else
really to talk about, I don't think. There will be a blocker meeting.
If you're aware of anyth
19 matches
Mail list logo