No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211021.0):
ID: 1037193 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211021.0):
ID: 1037209 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi Luya
I'm sending this email to packaging Mailing List ...
I'm also facing problems with some fonts packages,
see this error [3].
How I convert %_font_pkg ? from
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/lpf-mscore-fonts.git/tree/mscore-fonts.spec.in
Thank you .
[3]
warning: This package us
I could use some help on this thread about Fedora hardening flags and
getting them right for OCaml code:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/8648
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wo
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I could use some help on this thread about Fedora hardening flags and
> getting them right for OCaml code:
>
> https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/8648
I should have been more specific so people don't have to search the
me
On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 05:15:37 PM -0700, Tom Stellard
wrote:
To do this, you need to add -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--build-id=sha1 to the
linker flags.
I suppose I'll give it a try.
ld.bfd just made it even worse:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: lib/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37.55.4: mmap:
failed to all
OLD: Fedora-35-20211021.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211022.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:70.55 KiB
Size of
Hi,
I will take a shot at answer some of these, with the caveat that I am
not too familiar with this either. My answers could be completely wrong.
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> I could use some help on this thread about
Hi folks,
I just updated two F35 systems with updates-testing enabled and then
`klist` etc. stopped working for me. Some investigation seems to
indicate that the sssd-2.6.0 update may be involved---downgrading back
to 2.5.2 immediately fixes the issue on both systems. The update
however, has 3+ ka
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 11/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211021.n.0):
ID: 1037277 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1037277
ID: 1037349 Test: aarch64 Mi
The License field for python-trimesh has been corrected from “MIT” to
“MIT and BSD and zlib”.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 3:49 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 05:15:37 PM -0700, Tom Stellard
> wrote:
> > To do this, you need to add -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--build-id=sha1 to the
> > linker flags.
>
> I suppose I'll give it a try.
>
> ld.bfd just made it even worse:
>
> /usr/bi
On Fri, Oct 22 2021 at 11:24:31 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
If you do plan to go ahead with this at some point, please consider
either announcing it very publicly, or even better, filing a Change
proposal for it.
Consider this the announcement. ;) Not going to file a change proposal.
I'v
On 10/22/21 5:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22 2021 at 11:24:31 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>> If you do plan to go ahead with this at some point, please consider
>> either announcing it very publicly, or even better, filing a Change
>> proposal for it.
>
> Consider this t
14 matches
Mail list logo
