No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211017.0):
ID: 1031605 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sunday, October 17, 2021 2:40:05 PM CEST Steven Grubb wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
>
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > I'd like to suggest making libcurl-minimal very minimal for security
> > > reasons. The main curl packa
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211017.0):
ID: 1031621 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 10/14/21 14:57, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Enforce Authselect Configuration Consistency
This sounds good, I updated the page title. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211018.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:145.42
On Saturday, October 16, 2021 5:32:17 PM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:52:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi Kamil and everyone,
> >
> > what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
> > IIUC, libcurl and libcurl-minimal both have
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:10:38 AM +0200, Björn Persson
> wrote:
> > My question is: Is it true that this usage of SHA-1 makes the TLS
> > session weak, so that it's correct to forbid it in the crypto policy?
>
> Hm, I think Fedora's
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 02:20, drago01 wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 18, 2021, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
>> 2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
>> anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some v
OLD: Fedora-35-20211017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211018.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
a rebuild of all dependencies. The list of dependencies grows with each
rebuild and we have now reached 58 protobuf dependencies according to
repoquery.
This time
Resending with correct maintainers aliases (-owner does not work anymore)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:45:51PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
> rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
> a rebuild of all de
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Now, my makefile is a horrific hand-built thing from literally twenty years
> > ago, and it's probably not up to, like, best pratices of THAT time, let
> > alone now. But I do pass OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to %make_build in the
> > sp
Adrian Reber writes:
> The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
> rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
> a rebuild of all dependencies. [...]
Is it futile to point them to https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
in hope of avoiding this
Version 0.9.9 of gap-pkg-float is out, and changes the license from GPLv3+
to GPLv2+.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 15:56 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could
> >
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:01 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Now, my makefile is a horrific hand-built thing from literally twenty
> > > years
> > > ago, and it's probably not up to, like, best pratices of THAT time, let
> > > alone
I am going to reply to the parent and grandparent post at once, starting
with the parent post:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> This conversation is one that seems to happen to computer people as
> they age. I remember in the early 1990's that the Sun 4.1 installer
> was incredibly bloated and requi
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting.
I'll chair the next one too.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2674 F36 Change: PHP 8.1
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2674
APPROVED (+7,0,-0)
#2669 Non responsive maintainer: michelmno
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2669
APPROVE
On 18/10/2021 15:55, Adrian Reber wrote:
Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
which breaks the build of:
1. osmpbf
Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with
protobuf-compiler > 3.14.0 provided by protobuf-compiler-3.18.1-1.fc36.x8
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:26:46PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
> > > which breaks the build of:
> > >
> > > 1. osmpbf
> > > Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with
> > > protobuf-compiler > 3
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211017.0):
ID: 1032402 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/103
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211015.0):
ID: 1032539 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1032539
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
I looked at a few of the failures.
> 4. opencv
> 6. gazebo
> 7. fawkes
The root cause is of course a bad python-flake8 update, as described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014589
A lot of other packages are affected as well. The python-flake8 package
should definitely
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64), 9/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211017.n.0):
ID: 1032154 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1032154
ID: 1032281 Test: x86_64 universal
Hi,
> So in short the best current scenario is Anaconda booted in text mode
> from a USB stick or via PXE with NFS installation source - that should
> require the least amount of RAM at installation time.
>
> Still even then, especially with kickstart installations that have
> elaborate post sc
26 matches
Mail list logo
