No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211015.0):
ID: 1030009 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
I have rebuild eom yesterday for rawhide.
Untaging would force me another rebuild of eom.
I hope the update won't push to stable branches.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:53:28PM +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to start a retirement process for quagga in Fedora. The
> package is very outdated since the upstream is dead for a couple of
> years. There is a replacement in the form of FRR that can be used in a
> very simi
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> SHA-1 is blocked in certificate signatures because those can be
> attacked offline. Signatures in the TLS handshake are entirely
> different. I'm hardly an expert, but I think the attacker only has a
> few seconds to generate a hash collision before the user gives up a
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cha
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:52:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm working on extending quickemu[1] to be able to easily spin up
> Fedora VMs, but our lack of a static URL formula for fetching ISOs
> makes this a bit difficult.
>
> Do we have some kind of API endpoint that has the nec
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 04:13:34AM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Thinking about this more, I always get to a question:
> "Who are the consumers of that information and what do they actually
> use it for?"
One consumer is libosinfo. Tools which use libosinfo (of which there
are quite a few) will u
Hello,
I recently updated from F34 to F35 on an MSI laptop. I've noticed two
'regressions' and I'm not sure where to file bugs.
#1 - The first one is if I close the lid and the device suspends (I
assume as it used to do this fine), when I re-open the lid, the
keyboard lights up, fans start, b
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:52:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi Kamil and everyone,
>
> what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
> IIUC, libcurl and libcurl-minimal both have the same Provides, so
> libcurl-minimal
> can be used to satisfy automatically g
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 09:21:57AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently updated from F34 to F35 on an MSI laptop. I've noticed two
> 'regressions' and I'm not sure where to file bugs.
>
> #1 - The first one is if I close the lid and the device suspends (I
> assume as it u
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 15:40 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Try pressing ctrl-alt-f8 to switch to a text console. If the text
> login
> appears, then the issue was most likely in the graphics stack. If
> still
> blank, try pressing ctrl-alt-del. On a text console this should
> result
>
On 15. 10. 21 7:37, Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
The Zuul CI for pull requests does everything that the Fedora CI does
(scratch builds and tmt/standard tests) and more. Is there any reason
to keep Fedora CI on pull requests?
I like that we have a redundancy. When Zuul doesn't work, we look at the
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:04 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32
On 10/15/21 16:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
%{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
...
The "ansible" package could be a
meta package with "Requires: ansible-core ansible_collections" to
avoid the
Am 14.10.21 um 22:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
I think that those numbers (20GB+2GB) are quite reasonable for the
stated purpose of "install and run successfully". I think that people
The smallest device Fedora runs on, will propably be the Pinephone.
ATM..it has 3 GB Ram and a 32 GB
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 10/15/21 16:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
> > %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
> ...
> > The "ansible" package could be a
> >
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 05:45:47PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> They *can* physically, but doing both together would get very silly.
> I'd meant "do one or the other". The current model of "install
> ansible, get a few Megabytes of material you actually use that is
> almost entirely in ansi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211016.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 1.38 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:02:38AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> it could have made good sense, and still would, for the "ansible"
> package to be what is now being colloquially referred to as
> "ansible-core", but for which the published upstream git repo is still
> https://github.com/ansib
Hi,
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 15:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:02:38AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > it could have made good sense, and still would, for the "ansible"
> > package to be what is now being colloquially referred to as
> > "ansible-core", but for whic
OLD: Fedora-35-20211015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211016.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi Nico,
I understand your frustration about the Ansible reorganization, and I
agree that they could have documented it better, but I think that you
are missing the context surrounding this decision.
Oct 16, 2021 4:46:43 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Gordon Messmer
>
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> There seems to be some inconsistency with how our update workflow
> currently works. When an update gets enough positive karma "pre-push"
> (still in "pending → testing" state) so that it can be pushed to
> stable, bodhi changes its state to ("pending → stable"), making it
Hello all,
I have a new package request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011964 , which needs to be
reviewed.
If anyone is interested in a review swap — feel free to take it, and I can
review another package in return.
Thanks!
--
wbr, Denis.
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 16:31 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes
> and
> retires the old 'ansible c
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 12/141 (aarch64), 2/206 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0):
ID: 1030161 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
install_st
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 14.10.21 um 22:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> I think that those numbers (20GB+2GB) are quite reasonable for the
>> stated purpose of "install and run successfully". I think that people
> The smallest device Fedora runs on, will propably be the Pinephone.
>
>
Steve Grubb wrote:
> I'd like to suggest making libcurl-minimal very minimal for security
> reasons. The main curl package has many security issues (CVE's)
> constantly. But usually, the problem is in some obscure feature/protocol.
> Looking at the packages that depend on libcurl with rpmreaper, mo
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
>
> How will this effect EPEL? Is the plan to keep Ansible 2.9 there for
> now?
For now yes, but 2.9 will go EOL at the end of the year (last I heard).
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211015.n.0):
ID: 1030433 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1030433
ID: 1030439 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-i
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
> >
> > How will this effect EPEL? Is the plan to keep Ansible 2.9 there for
> > now?
>
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
