No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211010.0):
ID: 1022972 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello good people!
I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fedora, for keeping it
alive, and updatable.
In friday I had found an old laptop running f22 and decided to try a leap update to f34.
It was not just default inntall, there was vlc and much more "unknown"
comonents.
We
Happy to read this :)
Congrats, man :)
I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey
Jiri Vanek a écrit :
> Hello good people!
>
> I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fedora, for keeping it
> alive, and updatable.
>
> In friday I had found an old laptop running f22 and decided
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 11th
October (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapro
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211010.0):
ID: 1023220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 10:34 +0200, Casper wrote:
> Happy to read this :)
>
> Congrats, man :)
>
> I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey
F33 -> F35 should work (update) directly
> Jiri Vanek a écrit :
> > Hello good people!
> >
> > I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fed
Hi all.
Even Kalzium (new release) is rebuilt against openbabel3
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
De
V Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
> f30-> f34 died again on python stack.. (yah, dnf and freinds should stop
> using that or keep embedded interpreter)
DNF 5 is going be written in C++ without any Python.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211011.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On 10/11/21 12:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
f30-> f34 died again on python stack.. (yah, dnf and freinds should stop
using that or keep embedded interpreter)
DNF 5 is going be written in C++ without any Python.
with all its pros a
Hello packagers,
I'm glad to announce that now it's possible to move a package back from
a module to a nonmodular repository.
Motivation
==
In the past there was a problem that once a package was added into a module,
there was to way to return it back.
Let's say you have a curl:experim
Nice. I did an update from F26-F33 last year doing one version at time
instead of jumping more than one version... and had no major issues. I
wonder how far back its possible to start from and walk through the version
updates.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:55 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello good peopl
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-10-11 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be dis
On 11/10/2021 13:48, JT wrote:
Nice. I did an update from F26-F33 last year doing one version at time
instead of jumping more than one version... and had no major issues. I
wonder how far back its possible to start from and walk through the
version updates.
I recently did F15-F34 though I d
I think if you jump more than 2 versions at a time the packages obsoleted
by fedora-obsolete-packages might not be picked up properly because it only
holds packages for about 2 versions before they are removed from it. So
jumping from F26 to F33 directly might miss the obsoletes from F27-F31ish.
-
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:46 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> I'm glad to announce that now it's possible to move a package back from
> a module to a nonmodular repository.
>
This is awesome! Thank you so much for this! :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:21 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 06. 10. 21 v 9:44 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 09:39:46AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 05. 10. 21 v 18:04 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 11:28, Matthew Miller
> >>
OLD: Fedora-35-20211010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211011.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 10/9/21 5:33 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:03 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
rebuilding the following packages as part of the up
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
> Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc36
> Summary: A tool for installing and managing Python packages
> RPMs: python-pip-doc python-pip-wheel python
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/206 (x86_64), 11/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
Jerry James wrote on 2021/10/11 23:26:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc36
Summary: A tool for installing and managing Python packages
RPMs: python
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211010.0):
ID: 1023585 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1023585
ID: 1
Hi, some of JAXB packages failed to build possibly due to Maven/Ant changes
earlier this year, and since there has been no solution we decided to drop JAXB
dependency from Dogtag. We just barely managed to complete the work recently,
so unfortunately this could not be done much earlier before th
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:37:41PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Jerry James wrote on 2021/10/11 23:26:
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
> > wrote:
> > > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> > > Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
> > > Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/204 (x86_64), 2/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211010.n.0):
ID: 1023890 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1023890
ID: 1023905 Test: x86_64 univ
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
> After the upgrade.
> >
> >If you run remove-retired-packages after the upgrade, you already
> >managed to upgrade and nothing i
On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
After the upgrade.
If you run remove-retired-packages after the upgrade
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 10.10.2021 klo 23.49:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:14:06PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Hello,
Package Maintainer Docs currently recommend joining the package-announce
mailing list in two places [1,2], describing it as follows:
You should also consider joining the package
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> I've checked the status quo.
>>
>> Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
>> installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is not.
>>
>> 1. dnf upgarde, no r
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-10-11/fesco.2021-10-11-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-10-11/fesco.2021-10-11-19.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-10-11/fesco.2021-10-11-19.00.log.html
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>>When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
>
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 11.10.2021 klo 21.45:
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 10.10.2021 klo 23.49:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:14:06PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Hello,
Package Maintainer Docs currently recommend joining the package-announce
mailing list in two places [1,2], describing it as follow
On 11. 10. 21 21:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
When are
On 11. 10. 21 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've checked the status quo.
Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is not.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:45:59PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Sure, making people aware of all the tooling that is available is good. But
> the volume of messages in those lists is so large that I cannot believe it
> is a good idea to subscribe, unless some kind of automatic processing is
>
Hi Endi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:58 AM Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> Hi, some of JAXB packages failed to build possibly due to Maven/Ant changes
> earlier this year, and since there has been no solution we decided to drop
> JAXB dependency from Dogtag. We just barely managed to complete the work
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, I was asked to untag that after untagging the latest python3.10
> package.
>
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012513
>
> This is what failed rawhide composes from 20211006 to 20211009.
Got it. Thanks for satisfying my c
The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
they're going to keep failing until a human intervenes. Rebuilding
against Rawhide packages was supposed to fix this issue, but it
doesn't fix the problem we're ha
Could someone with sufficient permissions please get httpd package
unstuck in bodhi?
It's been sitting there for a few days, waiting to get to stable, but
it keeps getting kicked out, because some automated tests did not pass.
The package contains security fixes.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
___
Hi everyone,
I am Maxwell G or @gotmax23 on FAS and Github. I am relatively new to
Linux but after trying different distros, I settled on Fedora. I don't
have a lot of time between school and having chronic pain, but I'd like
to give back and contribute as much as I can.
I created a package for y
Maxwell G via devel kirjoitti 12.10.2021 klo 6.44:
Hi everyone,
I am Maxwell G or @gotmax23 on FAS and Github. I am relatively new to
Linux but after trying different distros, I settled on Fedora. I don't
have a lot of time between school and having chronic pain, but I'd like
to give back and co
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 10. 21 21:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Mirosla
On 12/10/21 00:37, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Could someone with sufficient permissions please get httpd package unstuck in
> bodhi?
>
> It's been sitting there for a few days, waiting to get to stable, but it
> keeps getting kicked out, because some automated tests did not pass. The
> pa
44 matches
Mail list logo
