No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210930.0):
ID: 1008226 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
> 13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
> rebuilding the following packages as part of the update:
>
> castxml
> doxyge
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
> > 13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
> > rebuildi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210930.0):
ID: 1008355 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello,
I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
currently also discussed with the upstream maintainer of pam_unix.
Replacing parts o
Hi,
I'm adding rhel-devel also to the mailing recipients to get RHEL developers
feedback.
I'd also like to hear if there's any opinion on replacing pam_unix from
Fedora and RHEL.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:14 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser <
besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm current
Hi,
On pe, 01 loka 2021, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
currently also discussed wi
Hi,
I've asked internally for RHEL developers feedback about this topic and
I'll post a summary of it in this email.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:39 PM Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm adding rhel-devel also to the mailing recipients to get RHEL
> developers feedback.
>
> I'd also like to hear if
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
There was a hiatus for some time, expect this weekly from now on
On 29. 09. 21 22:41, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
What bothers me as well is that this appears to have been communicated trough
internal channels only.
The manager of that team told me that future announcements will be
sent to the bugzilla-announce-l
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20211001.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210930.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 141
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1022.52 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 06:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
> mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
> with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
> currently al
OLD: Fedora-35-20210930.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 14
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi all,
A few weeks ago we started shipping 64 bit ARM (aarch64) artifacts
for our Fedora CoreOS streams. The download page [1] has been
updated to show the new artifact downloads and you should be able to
retrieve aarch64 information from all relevant stream and release
metadata.
Please report a
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.11
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.10 to Python 3.11, the
newest major release of the Python programming language.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]]
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email: pyt
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Setuptools_58%2B
== Summary ==
Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not
completely compatible with previous releases. Since version 58+
upstream removed support for 2to3 during builds. This is a breaking
change and projects are encour
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MIS
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
For those people who like simple to set up and working systems but are
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
>
> For
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:14:47AM +1000, Fred 1 wrote:
> I am trying to find what exactly is raising the error/problem
[snip]
> 2021-09-30 14:41:19,617: No protocol specified
> 2021-09-30 14:41:19,624: Unable to init server: Could not connect:
> Connection refused
It comes from the bug reportin
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
>> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
>> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
>>
>> For those people who like simple to set up and working sy
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:41 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> >> > light weight system which is simple to set up [
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >
> > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> >
> > > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> > > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and ear
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:42, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> >> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:51, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > >
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universitie
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/204 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210930.n.0):
ID: 1008974 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008974
ID: 1008987 Test: x86_64 Server-d
> This change proposal is the first I've heard of it. But since this is
> being proposed by the author of Pipewire, I kind of assume it's good,
> and I doubt Workstation WG would see the need to get involved unless
> concerns are raised. Does WirePlumber have some sort of deficiencies
> compare
F35 Final freeze begins on Tuesday 5 October.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to revert the regression-causing commit
2. abrt — abrt-dbus segmenta
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Mate live x86_64
Xfce live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/21 (x86_64)
ID: 1009466 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009466
ID: 1009472 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-is
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 09. 21 v 14:10 Ondrej Pohorelsky napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the latest git release (2.33.0), upstream stopped shipping
> > git-multimail. We are currently shipping it in Fedora with git-2.32.0,
> > but not as a standalone
On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 17:27 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > This change proposal is the first I've heard of it. But since this is
> > being proposed by the author of Pipewire, I kind of assume it's good,
> > and I doubt Workstation WG would see the need to get involved unless
> > concerns are raised
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have much for the agenda. There will be a blocker review meeting.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam William
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-10-04
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze
exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you can ta
34 matches
Mail list logo
