No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210923.0):
ID: 115 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter
should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the
side tag.
Vít
Dne 23. 09. 21 v 11:29 Miro Hrončok n
> Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71?
Yes, but in the case of autoconf2.71, I am wondering how to deal with an
update since this package should be the latest version.
Creating package autoconf2.72 in the future doesn't make sense to me.
My thought was to use autoco
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora N-1. You can
run it with para
On 24. 09. 21 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora N
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Should it query for removed packages instead of components?
> >
> > It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
> > python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
> >
> > PS That's why I mention
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210923.0):
ID: 1000205 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 20:10 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the %_host macro is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-
> gnu on
> the arm builders. I believe this is coming from the mockhost config
> option in kojid.
>
> In /usr/lib/rpm/macros %_host is defined as armv7hl-redhat
On 24/09/2021 06:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
Much more simple script:
sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3)
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
I have not used this patch for getting 'gnome-chemistry-utils' working
in x11 and Wayland:
diff --git a/programs/3d/main.cc b/programs/3d/main.cc
index 9bd59a4..aa18e3e 100644
--- a/programs/3d/main.cc
+++ b/programs/3d/main.cc
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
GErr
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:27 Marek Blaha napsal(a):
It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
Oh. Silly me. I will fix this.
Another idea: The script currently needs fedora-packager (for the pkgname
comm
On 24. 09. 21 12:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
But still I'd rather have this as part of distribution - a package
similar to fedora-obsolete-packages which would allow me to remove all
retired packages simply by installing it.
Oh there is already this proposal -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
'ghemical' and 'libghemical' should be okay, too.
On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
We must decide if go forward with most recent
We have no items on the agenda, so I'll cancel the meeting unless
someone wants to propose something in the next three hours.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2021-09-24 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210924.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 104
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-35-20210923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210924.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:59 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3)
This will remove packages which are not in current repositories.
On my workstation, this will suggests to remove webex, which I installed manually as an rpm. And I d
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MIS
Hello.
I have a lot of unremoved directories and files in /usr/lib/jvm/:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/
total 140
drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Sep 10 14:32
java-11-openjdk-11.0.12.0.7-4.fc34.x86_64
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 14 2017
java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc25.x86_64
drwxr-xr-x. 3 r
On Friday, 24 September 2021 16.14.23 WEST Titouan Bénard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm Titouan, I have made some contribution in open
> source and now I would like to contribute in Fedora.
>
> I would like to package python packages not present in Fedora.
>
> Thanks
Hi Titouan,
welcome to Fedora.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0):
ID: 1000787 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000787
ID: 1000795 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso ba
Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done.
Please, can anyone that uses these software test them?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/
On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:>
xdrawchem
https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17
Best regards.
F35 Beta is GO! Time to focus on the Final blockers.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to revert the regression-causing commit
2. abrt — abrt-dbus s
Steve Grubb kirjoitti 23.9.2021 klo 18.15:
On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:34:17 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
From all the scan that we've done on fullish installs in the past,
there's
only 2 others that you might run across: application/x-elc (lisp) and
application/x-java-applet.
Maybe you j
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-09-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
Fedora 35 Beta comes out next week, so let's check in and make sure
we're prepared.
If anyone has any
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-09-27
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 9 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted b
26 matches
Mail list logo
