On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:14:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
#v+
Error:
Problem 1: package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 requires
dhcp-relay = 12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34, but none of the providers
Hi,
On 9/7/21 1:34 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 07. 09. 21 v 9:26 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu used
>>> to be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on ATM
I did notice that bout++ in Fedora 35 is not installable:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
python3-bout++-mpich-4.3.2-6.fc34.x86_64
- package python3-bout++-mpich-4.3.2-11.fc35.x86_64 requires
libnetcdf.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- python3-bout++-mp
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210907.0):
ID: 971655 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi all,
An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC
(released upstream yesterday)
into rawhide in the next few days.
(Compared to beta2, this version has one moderate CVE-2021-3712 fix in
addition to other fixes.)
Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at
V Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 04:25:32PM -0400, Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
> System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server)
>
> This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP
> breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package
Local site content is not managed by Fedora. That's a local
I noticed the permissions on the library are wrong. I will try again
with the executable bit set.
Sorry for the confusion,
David
On 9/8/21 09:38, David Bold wrote:
I did notice that bout++ in Fedora 35 is not installable:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
python3-bout++-mpich-4.3.2
Tested on two machines, went without a hitch on one, but I got this on
the other:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64
- 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc3
Le 07/09/2021 à 11:51, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
php-EasyRdf orphan 1 weeks ago
php-Faker orphan 1 week
On 08. 09. 21 11:35, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 07/09/2021 à 11:51, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
php-EasyRdf orphan 1 weeks ago
php-Fak
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210907.0):
ID: 971754 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 10:13:39 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684
This one remains to be reviewed, any one for a swap please? :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time
Hi,
I just noticed that the packages for the sevctl utility were orphaned.
Its addition to Fedora was widely publicized at the time, because we
were the first (?) distribution to include tools for working with AMD
SEV. It looks like ckuehl left Red Hat (?), and their packages were
orphaned as a re
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:56:33AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Local site content is not managed by Fedora. That's a local user's content.
> Similar to generic dynamic libraries in /usr/local/lib64.
I'm aware of that, which is why I didn't bother including it on the
list. I only mentioned it beca
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:07 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if we should retire the remaining eclipse packages from f35
>> before the final freeze, as well? The main "eclipse" package is
>> already gone, so most of them are no
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 23:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> > 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> > Debian/Ubuntu.
> > I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> > versions however there are seve
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:25 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>
> Tested on two machines, went without a hitch on one, but I got this on
> the other:
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64
> - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>
On 9/8/21 06:28, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I think the gui of pdftk that I used is pdfchain, I also built pdfchain
in my copr repo [3] , if both packages works well I can unretire them .
Thank you
fyi, here on f34
dnf install bouncycastle
rpm -Uvh \
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/resu
Solomon Peachy kirjoitti 7.9.2021 klo 23.25:
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server)
This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP
breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package that just needs rebuilding
for F35's per
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:52:58PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> >- package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) =
> > 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed
>
> This line repeats a lot in your output. I think you will get forward with
> this if you f
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:19:41AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:52:58PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > >- package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) =
> > > 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed
> >
> > This line repea
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210907.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 09:21 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/7/21 1:34 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 07. 09. 21 v 9:26 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:46:31PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> php-imap is just a wrapper around uw-imap, and as a result was removed, too.
> Time to start migration to non-abandoned solution :(
Well, crap.
Fortunately the mostly-braindead Net_IMAP PEAR module will do what I
need..
Time t
V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> If I try to do this I get an error:
> # grub2-editenv - set menu_auto_hide=1
> grub2-editenv: error: environment block too small.
>
> What the issue here ?
Perhaps /boot/grub2/grubenv is corrupted and grub2-editenv is not very good
Hi Fabio,
Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
(2021 ira. 8, az. (11:56)):
>
> I just noticed that the packages for the sevctl utility were orphaned.
> Its addition to Fedora was widely publicized at the time, because we
> were the first (?) distribution to include t
On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 15:23 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > If I try to do this I get an error:
> > # grub2-editenv - set menu_auto_hide=1
> > grub2-editenv: error: environment block too small.
> >
> > What the issue here ?
>
> Perhaps
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the packages for the sevctl utility were orphaned.
> Its addition to Fedora was widely publicized at the time, because we
> were the first (?) distribution to include tools for working with AMD
> SEV. It
I was so focussed on work for the past year or so (including some work on
bugzilla.redhat.com ironically) I have severely neglected my Fedora role.
Last night I started reclaiming the packages still orphaned and I will be
updating them as needed.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tes
OLD: Fedora-35-20210906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210908.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 17
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.16 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that the packages for the sevctl utility were orphaned.
> > Its addition to Fedora was widely publicized at the time, because we
> > were the
Hi,
Sahana Prasad writes:
> An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC
> (released upstream yesterday)
Thanks for doing this!
I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like it's the
final/GA release, not an RC:
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:33:28PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just noticed that the packages for the sevctl utility were orphaned.
> > > It
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:33:28PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:35 PM Omair Majid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sahana Prasad writes:
>
> > An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC
> > (released upstream yesterday)
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like it's the
> fina
Hi,
all FF 92 buildprocesses are still running, unfortunatly the messages
about RCE Exploits have already gone public.
If possible, speed things up.
Thunderbird 91.1 got ready in time, but is stuck in the testrepo. I
suggest to emerg push them to stable.
TB 91.1 FC 33 as been tested and is
None of those issue affect Linux, they only affect Windows and Android.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-
Am 08.09.21 um 17:28 schrieb Leigh Scott:
None of those issue affect Linux, they only affect Windows and Android.
Good to know.
As it seems, the buildprocess of FF has gone stuck yesterday. maybe
someone here can restart it?
Best regards,
Marius Schwarz
___
Dne 08. 09. 21 v 15:23 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
If I try to do this I get an error:
# grub2-editenv - set menu_auto_hide=1
grub2-editenv: error: environment block too small.
What the issue here ?
Perhaps /boot/grub2/grubenv is corrup
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/205 (x86_64), 10/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210906.n.0):
ID: 972238 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/972238
ID: 972362 Test: aarch6
Due to outstanding blocker bugs, we do not have an F35 Beta RC. As a
result, F35 Beta is NO-GO by default and tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting
is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 35 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will be held at 1700
UTC on Thursday 16 September in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the
"targe
I didnt log the error messages but when rebasing Fedora Silverblue, there
was an issue that I encountered:
In Silverblue 34 I had at some point clicked "enable workstation
repositories" in Gnome Software and forgotten about it. This added a layer
with the relevant rpms.
As this rpm is now in the
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:22:49PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: problem with installed package
> watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64
> - watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> - nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I got this, not sure what to file against:
>
> Error:
> Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires
> libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
perl-Mozilla-LDAP was retired, so the bug
The license for the mpir package has been simplified from “LGPLv3+ and LGPLv2+
and (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) and BSD” back to the effective license of “LGPLv3+”.
See also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#What_is_.22effective_license.22_and_do_I_need_to_know_that_for_the_License:_tag.3F.
W
This isn't strictly a devel topic, but I'm posting here for wider reach.
We're almost ready to launch Fedora Chat, our new matrix-based
communications platform. If you'd like to help, see this thread and related
discussion category for details:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/hello-interes
This is F34 with 5041 packages. I think people alrady reported
arduino-core and gnuradio, I reported the gqrx libboost/boost_thread issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002104
On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of
Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that
slow?
:-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Benjamin Beasley kirjoitti 8.9.2021 klo 22.07:
The license for the mpir package has been simplified from “LGPLv3+ and LGPLv2+
and (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) and BSD” back to the effective license of “LGPLv3+”.
See also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#What_is_.22effective_license.22_and_d
V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
> Dne 08. 09. 21 v 15:23 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> > V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > If I try to do this I get an error:
> > > # grub2-editenv - set menu_auto_hide=1
> > > grub2-editenv: error: env
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:14:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
Error:
Problem 1: package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch requires ant =
1.10.9-2.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed
V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I got this, not sure what to file against:
> >
> > Error:
> > Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires
> > libperl.so.5.32()(6
54 matches
Mail list logo
