Hi,
On 8/29/21 11:46 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 8/1/21 3:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> But that doesn't stop anyone from maintaining an unsigned version.
>
>
> The documentation suggests that the UEFI binary can be loaded directly (which
> I've done), or through the EFI handover protocol. I h
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210829.0):
ID: 962292 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 07:55 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the update Ian. It was not meant the way every packager
> is ignoring the opened issues, we appreciate your work on this
> autoconf-2.71 issue. Sorry for generalizing this.
And my comment was not meant to sound negativ
HEADS-UP:
autoconf-2.71 is merged and built in Fedora rawhide together with the rest
of autotools: automake-1.16-4.1 and libtool-2.4.6-43.
In the next few days, scratch-build for each dependent package will be
executed and failed packages F36FTBFS trackers will be created.
Thank you all for your
On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 13:53, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
> Last year, I announced my intention to orphan openbabel. Several folks
> replied, but nobody said they wanted to take over as primary maintainer.
> In the end, I didn't actually orphan the package, but I didn't do any
Thanks for pointing this out.
I’ll unretire typer and typer-cli, then, and give it another chance.
It’s been less than eight weeks (only a few days!) so unretirement will
be quick and will not require re-review.
A little communication from the upstream maintainer would have really
helped!
Hello everyone!
Sorry for the really short notice, but please join us at the next Open
NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 30th August (today!) at 1300UTC in
#fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting,
and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over:
IRC:
https://web
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210825.0):
ID: 962802 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/962802
ID: 962803 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv
Hello everyone!
We had to reschedule the meeting due to lack of participants today
(really sorry for the late reminder :( ).
The next meeting would be held on 13th September 2021, at 1300 UTC. If
the time is not suitable, please let us know on our messaging channels
and we can have a vote to resc
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
>
> HEADS-UP:
>
> autoconf-2.71 is merged and built in Fedora rawhide together with the rest of
> autotools: automake-1.16-4.1 and libtool-2.4.6-43.
>
> In the next few days, scratch-build for each dependent package will be
> executed and fail
On 30. 08. 21 17:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
HEADS-UP:
autoconf-2.71 is merged and built in Fedora rawhide together with the rest of
autotools: automake-1.16-4.1 and libtool-2.4.6-43.
In the next few days, scratch-build for each dependent
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 5:29 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 30. 08. 21 17:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> >>
> >> HEADS-UP:
> >>
> >> autoconf-2.71 is merged and built in Fedora rawhide together with the rest
> >> of autotools: automake-1.16-4
A bit of heads up for anyone who uses custom/user macros with
rpkg(-util):
https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg-util/v3/macro_reference.html#user-defined-macros
With version 2, it was enough to have `rpkg.macros` file in the
directory where rpkg is executed and the custom macros were
automatically loaded
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting.
I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2654 Nonresponsive maintainer: Markus Mayer lotharlutz
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2654
APPROVED (+3, 0, -0)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Alway
I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often had to
take a look in the kernel documentation.
Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to download the `kernel-doc`
package however it does not seem to exist.
Some old fedora documentations still refer to it however so
On 8/30/21 12:20 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
For the grub bit I think you just need a menu entry with a chainloader
line in there, similar to how booting Windows in a multi-boot setup works.
Among other things, I've tried
insmod chain
chainloader //pcmemtest.efi
When that menuen
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:07, Nils K wrote:
>
> I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often had to
> take a look in the kernel documentation.
>
> Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to download the `kernel-doc`
> package however it does not seem to exist.
> S
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 1:44 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:07, Nils K wrote:
> >
> > I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often had
> > to take a look in the kernel documentation.
> >
> > Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to
Hi,
On 8/30/21 7:11 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 8/30/21 12:20 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> For the grub bit I think you just need a menu entry with a chainloader
>> line in there, similar to how booting Windows in a multi-boot setup works.
>
>
> Among other things, I've tried
>
> insm
On 8/30/21 12:08 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I checked the entry on a Windows multiboot system and it does not have the
"insmod chain" line, maybe droppint that helps?
Same result. GRUB returns immediately to its menu. I'm certain the
path is correct, because GRUB will report an error if it i
Hi,
I've had some life events keep me from pushing package updates for about a month. My
attempt at pushing the latest wine update resulted in an ARM build failure that
seems to indicate either a toolchain changes or compiler error. I couldn't find any
Fedora 36 changes to match. Any ideas?
On 8/30/21 8:37 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I've had some life events keep me from pushing package updates for about a month.
My attempt at pushing the latest wine update resulted in an ARM build failure that
seems to indicate either a toolchain changes or compiler error. I couldn't find
any
Greetings,
Some months ago, I announced [0] that I will move the package maintainer
docs from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org. I am happy to announce that
this task is complete and the docs are public in their new location now
[1]. Hopefully, this will allow existing and new packagers to find
Looks like a linker error due to missing exception functions.
Does link with --fno-exceptions helps?
En 31 ago. 2021 3:37, en 3:37, Michael Cronenworth escribió:
>Hi,
>
>I've had some life events keep me from pushing package updates for
>about a month. My
>attempt at pushing the latest wine upd
24 matches
Mail list logo
