Fedora-Cloud-33-20210827.0 compose check report

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210826.0): ID: 959281 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: OpenLDAP 2.5 - Fedora Release - Help Needed

2021-08-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Simon. On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 16:04, Simon Pichugin wrote: [...] > I'll wait a bit before posting the Change Proposal, in case somebody > would like to give more feedback on the idea. Please don't wait but just go ahead and post the Change Proposal. It will be discussed here anyway an

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source > >package: > > > >fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34 >

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210827.0 compose check report

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210826.0): ID: 959418 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew > > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210827.n.0 changes

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210826.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210827.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 8 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 221.67 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew > > > Jęd

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link D

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-08-27 Thread Ian Kent
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 10:53 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hello, > > In the near future, there is a plan to merge autoconf-2.71 to > rawhide. Due to the size of the change and possible breakage of > multiple packages going FTBFS. The number of these packages should > not be many, currently we have

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:22:04PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Currently, the spec file has subpackages for each desktop environment > > though (e.g. f35-backgrounds-gnome, f35-backgrounds-kde, etc.) since they > > have to be installed in different places for each background. How

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources > (all wallpapers since ancient Fedora), even if split into multiple > tarballs. > The way it's done today, only wallpapers for *one* fedora release have > to be u

Fedora-Rawhide-20210827.n.0 compose check report

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 19/207 (x86_6

Fedora-IoT-36-20210827.0 compose check report

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210825.0): ID: 959797 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/959797 ID: 959806 Test: aarc

are s390x builders overloaded? Or have they been reconfigured?

2021-08-27 Thread Kaleb Keithley
Hi, My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed. As recently as four days ago they were building fine. Any ideas? -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed

Re: Can comps handle virtual provides?

2021-08-27 Thread Rex Dieter
Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > We have recently renamed pypy3 to pypy3.7. > As a result, the pypy3-devel package is now called pypy3.7-devel, however > it still provides pypy3-devel. > > pypy3-devel is part of the python-classroom comps group in > comps-f36.xml.in. > > Normally, I'd rename th

Re: Plasmashell: Alt+F2 not working

2021-08-27 Thread Rex Dieter
Sergio Belkin wrote: > Since a few days ago, the keyboard shortcut Alt+F2 for opening "run > command" box is not working. Please followup on upstream bug report on the topic, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437364 In particular, if you can attach your /.config/kglobalshortcutsrc file there,

Re: are s390x builders overloaded? Or have they been reconfigured?

2021-08-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 10:27, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > Hi, > > My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed. > > As recently as four days ago they were building fine. > > Any ideas? No idea without links to actual koji build logs to see which of the systems it might be. --

Re: are s390x builders overloaded? Or have they been reconfigured?

2021-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:26 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Hi, > > My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed. > > As recently as four days ago they were building fine. > > Any ideas? > Out of curiosity I started a build on my F34 desktop with 32GB ram, and it just OOM'd. Maybe

Re: Can comps handle virtual provides?

2021-08-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:42 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > We have recently renamed pypy3 to pypy3.7. > > As a result, the pypy3-devel package is now called pypy3.7-devel, however > > it still provides pypy3-devel. > > > > pypy3-devel is part of the python-clas

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-08-23)

2021-08-27 Thread przemek klosowski via devel
On 8/25/21 4:54 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: It's not ideal if one obsolete website forces downgrading the security potentially for all the connections. I hope 5) is addressing that. That's something apps and only apps can handle. Well, but if the system policy says that TLS1.0 is banned, th

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-08-23)

2021-08-27 Thread Alexander Sosedkin
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 6:28 PM przemek klosowski via devel wrote: > > > On 8/25/21 4:54 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > It's not ideal if one obsolete website forces downgrading the security > potentially for all the connections. I hope 5) is addressing that. > > That's something apps and only

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources > > (all wallpapers since ancient Fedora), even if split into multiple > > tarballs. > > The wa

Re: are s390x builders overloaded? Or have they been reconfigured?

2021-08-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Hi, > > My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed. > > As recently as four days ago they were building fine. > > Any ideas? Nothing has changed with them recently. We do have some more resources for the kvm l

Re: are s390x builders overloaded? Or have they been reconfigured?

2021-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed. > > > > As recently as four days ago they were building fine. > > > > Any ideas? > > Nothing has chan

Update not obsoleting earlier update

2021-08-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c qemu-6.1.0-2.fc35 FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c created by rjones a day ago for Fedora 35 ^ This update contains a serious bug (it disables all crypto in qemu) and I "unpushed" it earlier today. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE

Re: Update not obsoleting earlier update

2021-08-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 07:33:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c > qemu-6.1.0-2.fc35 > FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c created by rjones a day ago for Fedora 35 > > ^ This update contains a serious bug (it disables all crypto in qemu) >

Re: Update not obsoleting earlier update

2021-08-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 8:34 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c > qemu-6.1.0-2.fc35 > FEDORA-2021-b827e4de0c created by rjones a day ago for Fedora 35 > > ^ This update contains a serious bug (it disables all crypto in qemu) > and I

qemu %check hanging intermittently

2021-08-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
It seems like the qemu test suite now hangs intermittently after running iotests. Here are some examples: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74631239 (x86-64) TEST iotest-qcow2: 313 TEST iotest-qcow2: nbd-qemu-allocation TEST iotest-qcow2: qsd-jobs Not run: 181 Passed

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Beta blocker status summary

2021-08-27 Thread Ben Cotton
Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. pipewire — pipewire-0.3.31-4.fc35.x86_64 no audio devices found (due to pipewire-media-session user session service not being automatically enabled on update) — NEW ACTION: Maintainer to automatically enable/start pipewire-

Re: qemu %check hanging intermittently

2021-08-27 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 3:42 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It seems like the qemu test suite now hangs intermittently after > running iotests. Here are some examples: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74631239 (x86-64) > TEST iotest-qcow2: 313 > TEST iotest-qcow2:

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources > > > (all wallpapers since ancient

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

2021-08-27 Thread José Abílio Matos via devel
On Friday, 27 August 2021 18.31.36 WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The other resource issue here is that when you modify the package to add > the new wallpapers, everyone who has any of the old ones installed will > need to pointlessly update them for the version change. > > But since that would only ha

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Beta blocker status summary

2021-08-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 14:50 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > 1. pipewire — pipewire-0.3.31-4.fc35.x86_64 no audio devices found > (due to pipewire-media-session user session service not being > automatically enabled on upd

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210827.n.1 changes

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-35-20210825.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210827.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:940.67 KiB Size of

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-08-30 Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-27 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have much for the agenda, and I am planning to run a blocker review meeting, so we'll just have that instead. If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead an

[Test-Announce] 2021-08-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

2021-08-27 Thread Adam Williamson
# F35 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-08-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker, 1 proposed Final blocker, and 8 proposed Beta freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time

Fedora-35-20210827.n.1 compose check report

2021-08-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 18/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210825.n.0): ID: 960168 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/960168 ID: 960202 Test: x86_6