No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210825.0):
ID: 958213 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210825.0):
ID: 958229 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Apparently so.
I don't see an announcement!
It broke the ceph install. :-(
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedo
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-08-27 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel mailin
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 6:09 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Apparently so.
>
> I don't see an announcement!
>
> It broke the ceph install. :-(
>
A little more context would be helpful. Is it broken in rawhide, f35, f34?
It looks like ceph is the only direct consumer of rocksdb so an email to
rock
Hi,
thanks for your reply, there should not be any packages on critical path,
which are not building currently.
HEADS-UP:
The plan for merging autoconf-2.71 to rawhide is Monday (30th Aug 2021), if
no issues will come up. After that, there is no need to do a regular build
of dependent packages, b
Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Each branch
in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An RPM using
the Fedora version as its version would result in an NVR that clearly
identifies the wallpapers:
* fedora-backgrounds/f34 => fedora-backgrounds-34-1.fc34
On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Each branch in
dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An RPM using the Fedora
version as its version would result in an NVR that clearly identifies the
wallpapers:
* fedora-backgr
Could those be collected into an archive somewhere? Like
fedora-backgrounds-extras or something similar? This would be a
significant change to the way backgrounds are packaged.
On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 02:45:18 PM +0200, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
Wouldn't a so
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 08:40:49AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> * fedora-backgrounds/f34 => fedora-backgrounds-34-1.fc34
> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-1.fc35
> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-2.fc35
> But I must be missing something; this seems like its way to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-08-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-08-26 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-08-26 12
From my user POV,
I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
actually a separate repo each time? Wouldn't it make sense to just call
it backgrounds?
Just asking
Stephen
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 09:23 -0400, Matt
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:14 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 16:27 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > my name is Simon Pichugin and I am a maintainer for OpenLDAP.
> >
> > Recently, OpenLDAP has released 2.5 version.
> > It has quite a big amount of changes -
> > https://
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 10:03, Stephen Snow wrote:
>
> From my user POV,
> I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
> release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
> actually a separate repo each time? Wouldn't it make sense to just call
> it backgrounds?
Seems to rebuild fine, but please don't, in the future, please and thank you.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_rawhide
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
S
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
> >Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work?
Yes please!
> >Each
> >branch in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An
> >RPM using the Fedora version as its ve
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your reply, there should not be any packages on critical path,
> which are not building currently.
I see grep on the list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943083
We should probably fix that quickly.
Z
On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source
package:
fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34
fedora-backgrounds/f35 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..35
Assu
Good answers
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 10:51 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 10:03, Stephen Snow wrote:
> >
> > From my user POV,
> > I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
> > release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
> >
Hi. I am a 19 year old Brazilian Computer Science student at the
University of São Paulo (ICMC campus) in my second semester of
graduation, and this is the first time I have tried to contribute to
any Free Software project.
2 years ago I started using Gnu/Linux and Fedora is my distro of
choi
Hello.
The gtg package was retired 3 years ago because of inactive upstream,
but it's been active for a while so I'd like to maintain it. To do
this, I need to become the owner of the "gtg" package and the
"python-liblarch" package, which is a dependency of "gtg" and was also
retired because
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 13:37 -0300, Miguel Reis de Araújo wrote:
> Hi. I am a 19 year old Brazilian Computer Science student
Welcome Miguel.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
Hi Miguel, to help you to get started the best is to read this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
I am also getting started as you.
Hope this helps.
- Iago -
En 26 ago. 2021 18:47, en 18:47, "Miguel Reis de Araújo"
escribió:
>Hello.
>
>The gtg package was
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210825.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210826.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 267
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.18 GiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
Thanks, I'll look at it.
Ondrej
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 5:19 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for your reply, there should not be any packages on critical path,
> > which are not buil
Hello,
maybe the bug was not closed by the maintainer, as grep seems to be
building properly
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/odubaj/autoconf-2.70/package/grep/
Ondrej
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 8:10 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Thanks, I'll look at it.
>
> Ondrej
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at
27 matches
Mail list logo
