Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on > 2021-08-10. > > I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] > (along > > with deve

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 01:44:25AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Petr Menšík wrote: > > No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state > > *-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one, > > probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it > >

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210806.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210805.0): ID: 942385 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On 06. 08. 21 4:17, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:37 PM Richard Shaw > wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote: > prusa-slicer - Expects open

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On 06. 08. 21 7:44, Milan Crha wrote: On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:20 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: The former owner appears to also be the upstream, so they might be back, but at least in the meantime, do you want to take it now that it's building again? Hi, I'm not sure I'm the best per

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Dne 05. 08. 21 v 18:47 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below. On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210806.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210805.0): ID: 942401 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

Am 05.08.21 um 14:00 schrieb Miro Hrončok: eclipse akurtakov, dbhole, eclipse-sig,    11 weeks     jerboaa, jjohnstn, lef, mbooth,     oliver, rgrunber What is the idea here? Is that a fallout of the Javapocalypse/the st

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 05. 08. 21 v 18:47 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > >>Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below. > >> > >>On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbign

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On 06/08/2021 01:44, Björn Persson wrote: That is, each of those 1600 packages would need to require systemd-filesystem. Perhaps this can be done automatically on the rpmbuild side: if a unit file is present, add a dependency on the systemd-filesystem package, as has already been done with CM

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

Richard Shaw wrote on 2021/08/06 2:01: Current status: blender - seems to be failing for Python related issue Already reported upstream: https://developer.blender.org/T89931 Currently no active response so far. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing l

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

On 06. 08. 21 12:31, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 05.08.21 um 14:00 schrieb Miro Hrončok: eclipse akurtakov, dbhole, eclipse-sig,    11 weeks jerboaa, jjohnstn, lef, mbooth, oliver, rgrunber What is the idea here? Is

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 1:17 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > I have multiple ssh keys, so I need to have this in my ~/.ssh/config to > specify which should be used for Fedora services: > > HOST *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.pagure.io > IdentityFile ~/.ssh/ > User > Hi Ankur Thanks for

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:57 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 08. 21 4:17, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:37 PM Richard Shaw > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > >

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:21 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Are you entering your username there, not your email address? > (The old account system would accept email address, but the new one does > not). > > Do you have a otp enrolled? If so, you need to append your otp to the > end of your password i

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Dne 06. 08. 21 v 12:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 05. 08. 21 v 18:47 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: Depends on how many maintainers should fix thei

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210806.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210805.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210806.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 15 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 125 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.31 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 20:38:54 +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 1:17 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > I have multiple ssh keys, so I need to have this in my ~/.ssh/config to > > specify which should be used for Fedora services: > > > > HOST *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.pagure.i

Fedora-Rawhide-20210806.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64

Re: [fedora-java] Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

Hey (IMO) the packages should be orphan first , to know the impact of the retirement , no ? A 5 de agosto de 2021 13:00:23 WEST, "Miro Hrončok" escreveu: >Hello, >here are the packages that should be retired according to the policy one week >before the beta freeze, that is on 2021-08-17. > >If

[HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

We are starting the rebuilds for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35Boost176 in the f35-boost side tag. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.76" commit pushed to your package's dist-git repo, please co-ordinate with me and Tom Rodgers (CC'd) about any

Re: Font Awesome version 5

Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > 4 and 5 (and 6) are not backward compatible. Glyphs are missing, > replaced, changed codepoints, etc... Not all things could be ported and > I don't believe we'll ever get rid of 4. > > > > Good thing is that _some_ of the packages with `Requires: > fontawesome-fonts` al