No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210723.0):
ID: 934788 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 01:08:12PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I don't see email notifications about successful and failed builds,
> > even though they seem to be happening in Koji and from the above
> > lists. Is it bein
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 06:53:21PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the mass rebuild, the package utox stopped building on s390x.
> The following test is failing, with a message regarding a memory leak:
>
>
> + /usr/bin/ctest --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210723.0):
ID: 934804 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi
I'd need help with the following issue with apitrace, which failed the
mass rebuild with:
apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym.cpp:70:
undefined reference to `__libc_dlopen_mode'
apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym.cpp:72:
undefined
* Sandro Mani:
> I'd need help with the following issue with apitrace, which failed the
> mass rebuild with:
>
> apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym.cpp:70:
> undefined reference to `__libc_dlopen_mode'
> apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210724.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210725.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
We are working on improving LD_AUDIT support, which is the plugin API of
the dynamic loader. It can in theory be used to implement such things.
Depending on the threat model, then DT_BIND_NOW and/or LD_PRELOAD
can be used to find the desired instance of dlsym(). If the threats include
"just in
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210725.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
Hello folks,
I've just noticed that in F35 Mass rebuild everything related to Free
Pascal is now failing to build.
The fpc compiler itself is FTB with the following output:
/usr/bin/ld:
/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-3.2.2/fpcsrc/rtl/units/powerpc64-linux/si_c.o:(.data.n_TC_$SI_C_$$_START_ADDRESS
Hi Jatin,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 14:25:05 -, jatin garg via devel wrote:
> I want to give an update on this PR
> https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/pull-request/356
> However unable to login due to either an `OpenID request was
> cancelled` or `Strange state: failure`. If anyone from the
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tests: 9/201 (x86_64
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210724.0):
ID: 935195 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/935195
ID: 935196 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've just noticed that in F35 Mass rebuild everything related to Free
> Pascal is now failing to build.
> The fpc compiler itself is FTB with the following output:
>
> /usr/bin/ld:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-3.2.2/fpcsrc/rtl/units/powerpc64-linux/
On Sat, Jul 24 2021 at 03:25:17 PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via
devel wrote:
Could this be made explicit in the testing instructions, or is the
version in F34 sufficiently different that any feedback from F34 users
will likely not be relevant?
Sure, I'll add it to the instructions.
There
25 Jul 2021 04:21:19 Alexander Ploumistos :
> Salut Nicolas,
>
> And welcome aboard!
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 3:54 AM Nicolas FORMICHELLA
> wrote:
>> and in process of packaging Canon IJfilter driver for AUR/RPM and DEB
>
> A long time ago I had managed to create an rpm from canon's package
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:48 AM Mark Pearson wrote:
>
> Hi Fedorans
>
> Lenovo are sponsoring Nest this year but unfortunately it clashes with
> my family holiday and so I won't be able to attend the event itself -
> I'll be by a lake in a cottage with no network access...
> I'm really disappointe
On 7/25/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Sandro Mani:
>
>> I'd need help with the following issue with apitrace, which failed the
>> mass rebuild with:
>>
>> apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym.cpp:70:
>> undefined reference to `__libc_dlopen_mode'
>> apitrace-9d4
* Nicholas Miell:
> On 7/25/21 4:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Sandro Mani:
>>
>>> I'd need help with the following issue with apitrace, which failed the
>>> mass rebuild with:
>>>
>>> apitrace-9d42f667e2a36a6624d92b9bd697de097cc4e619/wrappers/dlsym.cpp:70:
>>> undefined reference to `__libc_
Hello, folks.
Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the
perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05.
Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl
license (GPL+ or Artistic).
Please holler if this creates a problem for you.
Regards,
Emmanuel
_
Hi folks!
Is the chromium debuginfo package exists?
Quick searching in repos didn't find any debuginfo packages for chromium.
# dnf search chromium | grep debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:12 ago on Mon 26 Jul 2021 02:25:19 AM +05.
chromium-bsu-debuginfo.x86_64 : Debug information for
On 2021-07-25 2:38 p.m., Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
Is the chromium debuginfo package exists?
Quick searching in repos didn't find any debuginfo packages for chromium.
There haven't been any debuginfo packages for chromium for at least a
very long time. I assume it's disabled for some reason.
_
Samuel Sieb writes:
> On 2021-07-25 2:38 p.m., Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
>> Is the chromium debuginfo package exists?
>> Quick searching in repos didn't find any debuginfo packages for chromium.
>
> There haven't been any debuginfo packages for chromium for at least a
> very long time. I assume it
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:52:59AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Fedorans
>
> I'd much rather make sure I'm answering any questions the community has - I
> figure that's more interesting than me blathering on. I can't promise to
> answer everything, but will do my best. If you send me
24 matches
Mail list logo
