No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210715.0):
ID: 929364 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.
The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be gener
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210715.0):
ID: 929380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
be affecting lots of Livespin compose
failure,
including Fedora-Workstation-Live-Rawhide-20210716.n.0.
Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
I don't currently have anything on the agenda for today's meeting. If
you have something, please reply to this email or I will just go ahead
and cancel for this week.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2021-07-16 from 12
Hi Michel,
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 17:27 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
> Now that this is in the Koji builders... would this be sufficient to
> have it enabled for EPEL8 specs as well?
>
> - branch and build python-rpmautospec for EPEL8
> - add Requires: rpmautospec-rpm-macros to e
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 11:01 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 10/07/21 11:07, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto:
> > I haven't followed the dev of this project closely, is there a
> > guide for packagers to explain how it works and how to integrate it
> > to our workflow?
> >
> > Best regard
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 19:21 +0200, david...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> On 7/13/21 5:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:10:05AM +0200, David wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been trying to build git-cola for EPEL8, but the
> > > buildSRPMFromSCM
> > > is stuck for over 5 ho
This might not warrant a meeting, but it's something that just came up.
ELN-Extra
I never went beyond the Content Resolver initial setup, because there
weren't any real requests.
But now I am getting one.
Will the new ELN build implementation be able to do ELN Extra?
It would need to pull from the
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 02:28:20PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 7/15/21 6:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:28:50PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LIBFFI34
> >>
> >> == Summary ==
> >> Rebase libffi in Fedora 34 from
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:31 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 7/15/21 6:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:28:50PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> == Release Notes ==
> >>
> >> libffi does not public formal release notes. A change list can be
> >> found in libff
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:59 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> This might not warrant a meeting, but it's something that just came up.
> ELN-Extra
> I never went beyond the Content Resolver initial setup, because there weren't
> any real requests.
> But now I am getting one.
> Will the new ELN build imp
Yup. That sounds like a plan.
On 7/2/21 11:52 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 07. 21 v 5:25 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:24 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:20 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 4:58 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tu
Btw, not sure who did what, but thanx a lot. Without any touches, the epel8
package now builds fine.
So thank ou fedora relengs!
J.
On 6/22/21 6:27 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for epel8:
Package openjdk-asm
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are bein
Hi Nils,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 03:19:25PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> in order to use rpmautospec features, it needs to be available on the
> builder machines (which are F34) and, for local operations, on the
> machine running fedpkg or equivalent. I.e. making it available on EL8
> will h
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent on the agenda, so let's take a break.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedo
We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should move
on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
legacy systemd-nspawn hacks, podman requirement for building Fedora, etc.).
I created an issue [1], can you please vote there if you are concerned?
On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the bui
19 matches
Mail list logo
