No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210628.0):
ID: 918796 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:43:48 -0400
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:33 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:55:21 -0400
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > > the composes more reliable if w
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:39:16PM -, Paweł Marciniak wrote:
> I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've
> added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined).
>
> Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a
> kern
Dne 26. 06. 21 v 19:16 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
The process is complicated for multiple reasons:
1. There are a lot of steps to deal with corner cases which have come
up over the years which need to be dealt with.
2. There are some steps to make sure that the package is going to be
mainta
> I submitted a pull request that mashes your patch, Colin Walter's
> earlier pull reuqest, and some stuff I had worked on before into
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20047.
Ok. Thanks, but you meant https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20058 :)
___
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210628.0):
ID: 918812 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 22:34 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] :
> >
> > What is next ?
>
> The answer is the same one you were given two months ago.
>
> You need to seek out a sponsor:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_p
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-06-30 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
There are no nominated bugs and the two open bugs are being actively
nud
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> > rebuilds. I'm solicitin
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:14 PM Till Maas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> > rebuilds. I'm sol
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:09 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:43:48 -0400
> Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:33 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:55:21 -0400
> > > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN sid
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24. 06. 21 11:16, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > > ## Choosing git forge to host source-git rep
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:48 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, at 5:16 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Greetings from the Fedora source-git SIG! We are planning to start
> > publishing reports of what we are working on so everyone can easily
> > pay attention and get involved if
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210629.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:52 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok"
> > > wrote:
> > > >On 24. 06. 21 23:0
In one week, or slightly later, I will update python-pyrsistent to
0.18.0 in Rawhide (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977038).
This includes one minor API change; please see the release notes at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tobgu/pyrsistent/1b8e85ed0164a8f9908bee0524f9a9850c21c
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210628.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210629.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 36
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 37.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210628.0):
ID: 919197 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/919197
ID: 919201 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/199 (x86_64), 2/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210628.n.0):
ID: 918876 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:36:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > > the composes more re
On 24. 06. 21 18:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 06. 21 19:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
To compensate a rather ugly scriptlet is needed. The changes were proposed:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psutil/pull-request/10
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2-cairo/pull-request/1
The pu
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 16:11 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Hello!
>
> is this meeting on Libera or Freenode, the email says Freenode but i think
> thats a copy paste error right?
Sorry I didn't spot the error or the replies in time; of course the
meeting was on libera.chat. I again forgot to updat
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF35
== Summary ==
Switch the Fedora 35 GNU Toolchain to gcc 11 (lastest point release),
binutils 2.37, and glibc 2.34.
The gcc 11 is already included in Fedora 34, but the release will be
updated to the latest point release. The glibc 2.34 change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25
== Summary ==
IBus 1.5.25 will use `transfiletriggerin` script to generate the cache
file instead of `posttrans` script in each engine package, support the
include directive in the user compose file, IBus compose feature will
follow the GTK4 compo
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:07 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: If glibc 2.34 provides too disruptive to
> compiling the distribution we could revert to 2.33, but given that
> Rawhide has started tracking glibc 2.34, no show-stopper problems are
> expected.
On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
with this proposed approach.
How do you
On 6/28/21 6:57 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.17
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.17 in Fedora 35,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version wil
According to upstream, they are not going to deprecate GOPATH yet in this
version.
I built etcd with 1.17beta1 and everything went fine.
> On 29 Jun 2021, at 20:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On 6/28/21 6:57 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.17
>> ==
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:21 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
> with this proposed appr
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> >the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> >rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedbac
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Third_Party_Software_Mechanism
== Summary ==
Update mechanism for opting-in to "Third-Party Software Repositories"
so that the repositories are immediately enabled.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:otaylor| Owen Taylor]]
* Email: otay...@redhat.com
== Detailed D
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
== Summary ==
Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
that is a filtered view of Flathub.
== Detailed Description ==
'Note that this proposal is about user experience, procedures, and
technology -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
== Summary ==
Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
[https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
memory-constraints]), for optionally limiting build parallelism for
build-time memory-bound packages
==
On 29. 06. 21 21:10, Troy Dawson wrote:
Two issues I see deal with failed builds and new dependencies.
1 - failed builds.
Will there be an easy way for the ELN SIG (or whoever) to see what the failed
builds are? Or are all of these builds fire and forget?
Previously, failed build resulted in
On 29. 06. 21 18:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Would these rawhide builds go out in ELN composes?
I suppose they would got here, see below why I think it would be necessary.
The amount of "true ELN" builds in ELN compose would be the general
"healthiness" factor. When 100 %: perfect. When 90 %: quite
Thanks a lot for this Michel!
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
> memory-constraints]), for optionally limi
On Tue, Jun 29 2021 at 11:05:26 PM +0200, Dan Čermák
wrote:
Thanks a lot for this Michel!
Yes, this will reduce packager pain and suffering. Nice!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:36 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On the "uni-repo" counter proposal: there's a bunch of real-world
> > examples here of distributions using this successfully:
> >
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpmdistro-gitoverlay/blob/master/doc/reworking-fedora-releng.md#unified-sour
Hello,
I tried to contact the people behind "Standard Test interface" CI.
I sent the e-mail about 3 weeks ago.
Then after about 2 weeks (= ~1 week ago) I reacted to the same email
so it would appear in their inboxes again.
Yet no response came, so i'm trying here.
-- Original message
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 01:01 +, Randy Barlow via devel wrote:
> An example of this is gstreamer - in Gentoo I just have
> gstreamer installed, and the various plugin packs like good bad and
> ugly are just USE variables on that one package.
Ooops, I was wrong on this example. They do package g
For context:
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/hGwvCceDr14/m/wbyNWwgNBgAJ
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:02 PM Alejandro Sáez Morollón wrote:
>
> According to upstream, they are not going to deprecate GOPATH yet in this
> version.
>
> I built etcd with 1.17beta1 and everything went fine.
>
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
