No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210625.0):
ID: 916491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210625.0):
ID: 916507 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Honeslt y , process is so complicated
Now, I am again getting errors about "unaotirzed url"
How to make things happens intesaod of all thisnightmare ?
Thank you
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 19:58 +0200, Arthur Bols wrote:
> On 23/06/2021 19:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > How can
Maybe there is a way to import RPM packages from Debian ?
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/dovecot-fts-xapian
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 12:37 +0200, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
> Honeslt y , process is so complicated
>
> Now, I am again getting errors about "unaotirzed url"
>
> How to make
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210626.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210625.0):
ID: 916884 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916884
Old failures (same test f
There are no topics to be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-06-28 19:00 UTC'
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Nonrespo
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/199 (x86_64), 12/134 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've
added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined).
Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a
kernel command line argument systemd.status_unit_format=combined
The output for
kinit -R @ FEDORAPROJECT
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
A 23 de junho de 2021 18:34:20 WEST, Joan Moreau via devel
escreveu:
>Hello
>
>How can I move forward on this ?
>
>Thank you
>
>
>On April 27, 2021 21:51:53 Joan Moreau via devel
> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>> I am tr
Hi.
There seem to have a bug with rust dependency detection with owned_ttf-parser.
I am not sure what components create the bug.
https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37#issuecomment-868976786
It should have detect that the version doesn't match.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
publi
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:57 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi.
> There seem to have a bug with rust dependency detection with owned_ttf-parser.
> I am not sure what components create the bug.
> https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37#issuecomment-868976786
>
> It should have detec
I forgot that. I shouldn't do so much things at the same time.
Envoyé depuis ProtonMail mobile
\ Message d'origine
Le 26 juin 2021 13 h 07, Fabio Valentini < decatho...@gmail.com > a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:57 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
The process is complicated for multiple reasons:
1. There are a lot of steps to deal with corner cases which have come
up over the years which need to be dealt with.
2. There are some steps to make sure that the package is going to be
maintained versus just dropped and forgotten as a lot of package
ok
I updated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
What is next ?
Thank you so much
On 2021-06-26 17:49, Sérgio wrote:
kinit -R @ FEDORAPROJECT
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
A 23 de junho de 2021 18:34:20 WEST, Joan Moreau via devel
escreveu:
Hell
* Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] :
>
> What is next ?
The answer is the same one you were given two months ago.
You need to seek out a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
Emmanuel
___
devel mai
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> There are no topics to be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.libera.chat.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> d
Greetings,
wlroots 0.14.0 was released this week with a lot of bugfixes, new pixman
software renderer for not-so-recent hardware and continuation of
renderer refactoring. As usual, the update is API and ABI breaking and
all dependent packages must be rebuilt.
I'll be taking care of all rebui
On 26. 06. 21 23:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I cannot chair the following meeting next week, if any other
FESCo member can do that, please let me know.
I can.
Thank you, Zbyszek.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:50 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> fmt 8.0.x update will include soversion bump from .7 to .8.
>
> All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide.
>
This is ambiguous... Are you going to rebuild the dependencies or are
Hello package wranglers,
I maintain the python-cffsubr package for Fedora. It was added to the
repo and built on 2021-03-17 (during the beta freeze timeline of
Fedora 34).
The package was built for f33, f34 & f35; see [1]. But probably
because of beta freeze, the f34 build didn’t go to repo. That
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:30:47AM +0530, Rajeesh K V wrote:
> Hello package wranglers,
>
> I maintain the python-cffsubr package for Fedora. It was added to the
> repo and built on 2021-03-17 (during the beta freeze timeline of
> Fedora 34).
>
> The package was built for f33, f34 & f35; see [1].
> Yes, just build python-cffsubr-0.2.8-3.fc34.
Many thanks!
Just built a new release and pushed the update to testing.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
23 matches
Mail list logo
