Fedora-Cloud-33-20210625.0 compose check report

2021-06-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210624.0): ID: 915751 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: > >On 24. 06. 21 23:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> Dne 24. 06. 21 v 15:48 Tomas Tomecek napsal(a): > One thing to consider is that the upstream tarballs might be > >crypt

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:07:45PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 24. 06. 21 v 15:48 Tomas Tomecek napsal(a): > > > One thing to consider is that the upstream tarballs might be > > > cryptographically > > > signed and packages should verify the signature in %prep. > > This is a very good point

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > I think we should try to push upstream to sign git tags, instead or in > addition to tarballs. For upstreams, this is actually much easier > (just 'git tag' → 'git tag -s' and you're done) compared to e.g. signing > a tarball on github which requires some interacti

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210625.0 compose check report

2021-06-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210624.0): ID: 915995 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:51:11AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > I think we should try to push upstream to sign git tags, instead or in > > addition to tarballs. For upstreams, this is actually much easier > > (just 'git tag' → 'git tag -s' and you're done) co

use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: - Jun 20 22:04:48 krowka systemd[1]: Started Rule-based Manager for Device Events and Files

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 10:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > - Jun 20 22:04:48 krowka systemd[1]: Started Rule-based Manager for Device > Events and Files. > + Jun 20 22:04:48 krowka systemd[1]: Started systemd-udevd.service. > > [SNIP] > > Would people be opposed to making this

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:21:05AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: - Jun 20 22:04:48

Orphaning rubygem-expression_parser

2021-06-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I am orphaning rubygem-expression_parser. This used to be dependency of rubygem-wikicloth, which was retired some while ago already. This package is mostly dead upstream and I don't have any other use. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the > Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: > > - Jun 20 2

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 24. 06. 21 v 23:22 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives across different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream signs the git generated archive, generating a byte2byte identical one might be tricky. Neither git nor tar can

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 25. 06. 21 14:40, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 24. 06. 21 v 23:22 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives across different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream signs the git generated archive, generating a byte2byte identical on

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > > > > On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: > > >On 24. 06. 21 23:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > >> Dne 24. 06. 21 v 15:48 Tomas Tomecek napsal(

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 25. 06. 21 v 14:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives across different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream signs the git generated archive, generating a byte2byte identical one might be tricky. Neither git nor tar can

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 25. 06. 21 14:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 25. 06. 21 v 14:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives across different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream signs the git generated archive, generating a byte2byte identical on

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Frédéric Pierret
Le 6/25/21 à 2:51 PM, Neal Gompa a écrit : On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote: On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: On 24. 06. 21 23:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 24. 06. 21 v 1

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210625.n.0 changes

2021-06-25 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210624.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 69 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.74 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Lokesh Mandvekar
Hi list, I own the rhcontainerbot account. Apologies it took so long to respond to this thread. A number of legitimate concerns have been raised about the bot, so let me address those below on behalf of the Containers team. 1. We have disabled all autobuilds for now. 2. The podman

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:40:22PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 24. 06. 21 v 23:22 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > AFAIK git does not grantee to produce byte2byte identical archives > > across different versions of git, zlib, gzip etc. So even if upstream > > signs the git generated archive, gene

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > Hi list, > > > I own the rhcontainerbot account. Apologies it took so long to respond to > this thread. A number of legitimate concerns have been raised about the bot, > so let me address those below on behalf of the Containers team. >

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:04 AM Frédéric Pierret wrote: > > > > Le 6/25/21 à 2:51 PM, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:43:17AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:04 AM Frédéric Pierret > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 6/25/21 à 2:51 PM, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 0

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 25. 06. 21 v 16:25 Neal Gompa napsal(a): We will use openSUSE’s OBS for builds of the latest upstream commits for our users who need the latest packages. We would need this to check if the latest commits in podman work well with new kernel features and selinux. We will also notify the cont

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 6/25/21 7:19 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: I personally prefer the description myself, actually. Many unit names are more meaningless than the descriptions. One point ... It's far easier to get the description from the unit name than vice versa. -- ==

Fedora Prioritized Bugs status

2021-06-25 Thread Ben Cotton
Hi everyone, We have two open prioritized bugs that could use some extra help: * Akonadi does not start due to DB failure — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953675 * A glibc test hangs upon pthread cancellation when glibc is compiled with annobin turned on — https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:21:05AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the > Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: > > -

F35 Change: Optimal LUKS Encryption Sector Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-06-25 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LUKSEncryptionSectorSize == Summary == Autodetect optimal encryption sector size during Fedora installation with LUKS/dm-crypt encryption. On devices with 4k (physical) sector size, this will make sure we use 4096 sector size which is optimal for these devic

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:21 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the > Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: > > - Ju

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 6:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the > Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: I meant to

Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0 compose check report

2021-06-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 16/134 (aarch64), 6/199 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

"The fedora 34 iso/installer still hasn't been updated/is broken since November 2020 to install to MD raid arrays"

2021-06-25 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hello, Some popular tech youtuber is encountering problems to install Fedora on MD raid arrays: https://twitter.com/tekwendell/status/1408255117506326529 The related bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897350 Is there any thing that can be done to alleviate this issue faster?

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0 compose check report

2021-06-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 16:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 2 of 43 required tests failed > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > > Failed openQA tests: 16/134 (a

Re: "The fedora 34 iso/installer still hasn't been updated/is broken since November 2020 to install to MD raid arrays"

2021-06-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 19:00 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > Some popular tech youtuber is encountering problems to install Fedora on > MD raid arrays: > > https://twitter.com/tekwendell/status/1408255117506326529 1 Retweet 1 Quote Tweet 50 Likes You've got a generous definition

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210625.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2021-06-25 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210625.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:23:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:21:05AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names inst

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:52:48PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 6:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the

Fedora-IoT-35-20210625.0 compose check report

2021-06-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210623.0): ID: 916461 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916461 ID: 916462 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_os

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 6/25/21 10:25, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: Hi list, I own the rhcontainerbot account. Apologies it took so long to respond to this thread. A number of legitimate concerns have been raised about the bot, so let me address those below on behal

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-06-25 Thread Andrew Bauer
Thanks Mikolaj - Just saw your reply and have added you as an admin. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 PM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > On 6/25/21 10:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lokesh Mandvekar > > wrote: > >> Hi list, > >> > >> > >> I own the rhcontainerbot account. Apologies it took so long to respond to > >> this thread. A number of legiti

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 6/25/21 16:13, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 PM Daniel Walsh wrote: On 6/25/21 10:25, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: Hi list, I own the rhcontainerbot account. Apologies it took so long to respond to this thread. A number of

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

2021-06-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Colin Walters: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 6:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= >> / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the >> Description in messages on the kernel console an

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:43 PM Daniel Walsh wrote: > (snip) > > And sometimes this breakage is caused by other parts of the system. For > example a kernel update caused breakage in Podman when it suddenly > enabled overlay mounts, which no one had tried. We quickly fixed the > container-selinu

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

2021-06-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 15:42 -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > And sometimes this breakage is caused by other parts of the system. For > example a kernel update caused breakage in Podman when it suddenly > enabled overlay mounts, which no one had tried.  We quickly fixed the > container-selinux pac