Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

Bodhi has a config setting ('automatic_updates_blacklist') which can avoid specific users/bots to automatically create updates. If those bots are supposed to only test Koji builds, but not pushing updates we can list them out using that setting. Mattia ___

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210620.0): ID: 913108 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:49:17AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream changes > > it beg the question if now would not be the time to stop supporting > > booting in legacy bios mode and move to uefi only supp

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

Dne 17. 06. 21 v 20:02 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a): Ken Dreyer kirjoitti 17.6.2021 klo 19.04: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:33 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:22 AM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: To be clear: I don't want to fiddle with the sources file, hence this email.

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210620.0): ID: 913118 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913118 ID: 913119 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake. > > We shouldn't have approved a bot tha

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On 21. 06. 21 11:48, Ankur Sinha wrote: I don't think there's a policy against this, but apart from podman, I cannot recall seeing maintainers/dev teams give karma to their own packages' updates. I don't think that works---the idea of Bodhi is to allow ample opportunity for*others* to test the

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I th

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 21st June (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 21st June (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro Ma

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 07:34:03AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Bodhi has a config setting ('automatic_updates_blacklist') which can > avoid specific users/bots to automatically create updates. > > If those bots are supposed to only test Koji builds, but not pushing > updates we can list

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 18:25, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails with: > > > [MIRROR] kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel8/koji/latest/

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: Ken Dreyer kirjoitti 17.6.2021 klo 19.04: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:33 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:22 AM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: To be clear: I don't want to fiddle with the sources file, henc

Re: intent to orphan notice: python-nss

This has been orphaned. - A ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guideline

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210621.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210620.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210621.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:871.42

RE: Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

Hi, Could you please add me to 'packages' group I will support package process for ucx https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ucx Thanks -Original Message- From: Anatoly Vildemanov Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 10:47 AM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Cc: Vitaly Zaitsev S

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U

python-connection_pool Review Swap

Hello everyone! I was packaging up some deps for a tool which would be useful in NeuroFedora [0]. A package review for python-connection_pool is still pending to proceed further, and I would be happy to swap them with other developers here :D Review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1

Re: [HEADS UP] Moving to sip 5 in Rawhide

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote: Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt and wxPython.) I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon. Please DO N

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Hmm, but why would it be pulling those? I’m merely trying to run mock on my own machine in a script: BUILD=epel-8-x86_64 #echo Cleaning $BUILD #mock -r $BUILD --scrub=all mock --clean -r $BUILD --enablerepo=local --spec=swift-lang.spec --sources=../SOURCES --resultdir=$MYDIR/mock-results --build

Fedora-IoT-35-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210620.0): ID: 913545 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913545 Old failures (same test f

Fedora-Rawhide-20210621.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 22/134 (aarch64), 12/199 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20

Re: x86_64-v2 in Fedora

On 6/18/21 1:42 AM, Mark Otaris wrote: For Fedora, linux-hardware.org says 78% use EFI and 16% have Secure Boot enabled. Not a very good data set, though Fedora telemetry wouldn’t be either. Of ~ 1K linux boxes in&around my env -- bare metal & VM, servers & desktops -- ~ 550 are now running fu

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

64 > systems which store bootloaders on boot media will have a space for it > (as some already read from around that area). I'm confused what image(s) you're referring to because, e.g. Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210621.n.0.aarch64.raw has this partition scheme: Number Sta

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 6/16/21 10:58 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 6/16/21 2:11 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:56 AM Tom Stellard > wrote: > >> > >> On 5/7/21 10:48 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > >>

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:46 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, the script is failing the glib2 build due to an invalid rpath, but > unless I'm missing something obvious, I think it's valid. Reported: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973304 > > > I've sent an upstream PR for that

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:53 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > > > > W dniu 03.06.2021 o 22:35, Ben Cotton pisze: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > With recent changes in pub

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote: >I don't think GRUB has exclusivity over this guid, > and was always intended to be generic, I'm just not aware of any > bootloader that uses it. any ^other bootloader -- Chris Murphy ___ devel maili

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 2:54 PM Andrew Bauer wrote: > > Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it. You can transfer jakarta-mail package to me if you like. It's a dependency of Ant which I'm maintainer of . -- Mikolaj Izdebski > __

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

I don't know. on my systems I did a find /etc/mock/ -type f -print | xargs grep infrastructure.fedoraproject.org and did not have any hits. On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hmm, but why would it be pulling those? I’m merely trying to run mock on my > own machine in a script: >

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Funny enough, neither did I. On 21 Jun 2021, at 11:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I don't know. > > on my systems I did a find /etc/mock/ -type f -print | xargs grep > infrastructure.fedoraproject.org and did not have any hits. > > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Ron Olson wrote: >> >> Hmm, but

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

OK I was able to replicate it. My apologies I had a 'local' local on the machine I was 'duplicating' and my laptop had a [local] name=local baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-build/latest/$basearch/ cost=2000 enabled=0 skip_if_unavailable=False so the laptop broke while the bui

1974358 – Review Request: fdr - Flight Data Recorder

Hello, Anybody interested in doing a "review swap" or just a review?? Here is my review request [1]. I would like to get this into f35. tia, steved. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974358 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

W dniu 21.06.2021 o 17:43, Chris Murphy pisze: Please make first partition at least 4MB in size. Those Arm/AArch64 systems which store bootloaders on boot media will have a space for it (as some already read from around that area). I'm confused what image(s) you're referring Sorry, my mistake.

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

From what I can recall, the local repo was never intended to be used by epel. It was to allow fedora builds to use the existing koji buildroot, but that would never work for epel as we cannot publish all the rhel rpms in the buildroot. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:09 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide) > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the > > existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not > > allowed to submit builds

F35 Change: Libvirt Modular Daemons (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibvirtModularDaemons == Summary == Historically all libvirt functionality was provided in the monolithic libvirtd daemon. Upstream has developed a new modular architecture for libvirt where each driver is run in its own daemon. Primarily this provides bette

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Yep, removing —enablerepo=local did the trick. Thanks! On 21 Jun 2021, at 13:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > OK I was able to replicate it. My apologies I had a 'local' local on > the machine I was 'duplicating' and my laptop had a > [local] > name=local > baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraprojec

ntl soname bump

Just in time to miss the big pile of package rebuilds I did last week for various mathematical packages, ntl 11.5.0 is out and comes with an soname bump. In a few days, I will build the new version of ntl for Rawhide only and rebuild dependent packages: eclib flint giac latte-integrale Macaulay2

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 10:48 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I th

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden kirjoitti 21.6.2021 klo 14.50: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: I am a bit confused about this discussion. My fedpkg does not care about the 'sources' file or the lookaside cache at all on 'fedpkg mockbuild'. It simply looks up the expe

Orphaned python-sure

I've orphaned python-sure. I've only maintained it because python-freezegun used it, but the dependency was bogus, see: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-freezegun/pull-request/13 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ deve

Fwd: glibc gconv package split

[Fixing up my mailing list settings and re-sending] Hello, Apologies for the delayed announcement but as of glibc-2.34.9000-13.fc35, the glibc package has been split to create a new package glibc-gconv-extra to hold most converter modules into a separate package. The common converters such as th

Re: Fwd: glibc gconv package split

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:18:09AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > [Fixing up my mailing list settings and re-sending] > > Hello, > > Apologies for the delayed announcement but as of > glibc-2.34.9000-13.fc35, the glibc package has been split to create a > new package glibc-gconv-extra to hold