Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:34:16AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > FWIW, there's also debian:stable-slim at 72 MB > > > registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/leaplatest 1a798c6c690f 5 > > days ago108 MB > > docker.io/library/ubuntu latest 7e0aa2d69a15 3 > >

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:48, Joe Doss wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna > > wrote: > >> I think this is the fundamental difference here, Fedora CoreOS does > >> not have a version number. It has 3 streams, stable, testing and > >> next, these streams are based on a version

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210520.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210519.0): ID: 890294 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

[Bug 1962451] perl-perlfaq-5.20210520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962451 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e1c0b2d767 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e1c0b2d767 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

Dne 20. 05. 21 v 8:54 Clement Verna napsal(a): On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:55, Neal Gompa > wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna mailto:cve...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz mailto

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:15:57 AM WEST Ian McInerney wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber > > > > wrote: > > > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong > > > > anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in a

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:38:08PM +, David Allsopp wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > (I've added a few opam devs to CC) > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > opam orphan 1 > > weeks ago > > > >

Re: i686 build OOMing

Is disabling debug on i686 an option? --- a/vulkan-validation-layers.spec +++ b/vulkan-validation-layers.spec @@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ developing applications that use %{name}. %build # Decrease debuginfo verbosity to reduce memory consumption even more +%ifarch %{ix86} +%global debug_package %{nil}

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 19 May 2021, at 18:38, David Allsopp wrote: > > > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> (I've added a few opam devs to CC) > >> > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> opam

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210520.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210519.0): ID: 890310 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/890310 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests comp

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > There is some tooling written by Jerry James to turn opam metadata > into Fedora packages and with a bit more coordination and development > this could be mostly automated. (Fedora package review gets in the > way, but I think e

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210520.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210519.0): ID: 890326 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:15 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > On 19 May 2021, at 18:38, David Allsopp wrote: > > > > > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >> (I've added a few opam devs to CC) > > >> > > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:17 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:34:16AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > FWIW, there's also debian:stable-slim at 72 MB > > > > > registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/leaplatest 1a798c6c690f 5 > > > days ago108 MB > > > docker

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2021-05-21 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9920/ ___ devel m

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2021-05-21 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/ ___ devel maili

Unannounced soname bump: libgta

Looks like a long standing FTBFS was finally fixed, after previous version update attempts failed and the soname bump (0->1) went unnoticed. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgta/commits/rawhide Looks like only two packages need rebuilding: gdal OpenSceneGraph I'll go ahead and kick off buil

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:37:55PM -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > The sad thing with these types of slimming is that it is horrible in > production use case. > > I often describe layered images in the form of a wedding cake, where you > have a large base > > and then smaller  mid section say wit

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On 5/20/21 02:54, Clement Verna wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:55, Neal Gompa > wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna mailto:cve...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz mailto:to...@pi

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:39 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > the drawback of that is we have to remember to manually update that > list of versions each time a release branches. Which will inevitably > get forgotten sometime. That's why I wanted to use the wildcards. But > it's the best option I can

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Mon, May 17, 2021, at 6:05 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase > > > > == Summary == > > This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux, > > shadow-utils) from th

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On 5/20/21 08:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:37:55PM -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: The sad thing with these types of slimming is that it is horrible in production use case. I often describe layered images in the form of a wedding cake, where you have a large base and the

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:15:18AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:39 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > the drawback of that is we have to remember to manually update that > > list of versions each time a release branches. Which will inevitably > > get forgotten sometime. Th

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libgta

And now I'm rebuilding opencv due to soname bump (28->29) in gdal. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorapro

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 08:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:15:18AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:39 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > > the drawback of that is we have to remember to manually update that > > > list of versions each time a rel

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

If I may, I think the issue is right there in the name: Fedora CoreOS. The Fedora name brings some expectations and it seems CoreOS, by its nature, can’t be at parity with the other Fedora flavors and that leads to confusion. I can attest that I was surprised when I learned Fedora CoreOS didn’t

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libgta

Aand vtk needs to be rebuilt for gdal, so that's going to take a while. I hope this rabbit hole isn't much deeper. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 02:55, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > >> It's not like making changes and breaking upgrades is acceptable in >> Fedora Linux either. > > > Breaking or non backward compatible changes are acceptable in Fedora Linux > tho between major version bump. Again here the cgroups v2 is

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libgta

Please consider updating the spec files as you go to help avoid the problem in the future, e.g., https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgta/pull-request/1. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > This might end up being a major problem with FCOS, if we are stuck with > the defaults forever, and never able to take advantage of new > technology. Note that with cgroups v2, the status quo is that nodes updated in place stay on v1

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Then maybe FCOS needs to have a major version number to indicate that > these breaks are going to happen. I am going to say off the bat it DOES > NOT need to be the same as the Fedora Linux release number. It also > doesn't mean

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:51:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > (Fedora package review gets in the > > way, but I think even most Fedora developers think Fedora package > > review is the wrong approach.) > > > > *I* certainly don't think that. I do think that the method of > execution for package

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Eh, I though initially that OPAM is a new abbreviation of *O*rphaned > *PA*ckages looking for new *M*aintainers OCaml Package Manager :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 12:50, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Then maybe FCOS needs to have a major version number to indicate that > > these breaks are going to happen. I am going to say off the bat it DOES > > NOT need to be the sa

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 8:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Lets say the Fedora base image is refreshed with updated RPMs on a weekly > basis. Each application republishes their app containers on an arbitrarily > different schedule, maybe fortnightly, monthly, whatever. Thus out of > 10 differ

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 15:58 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 8:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Lets say the Fedora base image is refreshed with updated RPMs on a weekly > > basis. Each application republishes their app containers on an arbitrarily > > different sche

Re: opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:14 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > There is some tooling written by Jerry James to turn opam metadata > into Fedora packages and with a bit more coordination and development > this could be mostly automated. (Fedora package review gets in the > way, but I think even most

When is pappl going to be good enough to replace cups?

Thoughts? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pappl ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c

Re: When is pappl going to be good enough to replace cups?

On 2021-05-20 2:09 p.m., Reon Beon via devel wrote: Thoughts? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pappl My reading of that is that it's something that works with cups, not replaces it. Apparently we're supposed to use printer applications now instead of printer drivers. _

guava update to 30.1 in Fedora rawhide

Hello, Next week I'm going to update package guava in Fedora rawhide from version 25.0 to version 30.1. The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages depending on guava. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep working with updated guava. The update has already been c

hamcrest update to 2.2 in Fedora rawhide

Hello, Next week I'm going to update package hamcrest in Fedora rawhide from version 1.3 to version 2.2. The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages depending on hamcrest. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep working with updated hamcrest. The update has already

maven-plugin-bundle update to 5.1.1 in Fedora rawhide

Hello, Next week I'm going to update package maven-plugin-bundle in Fedora rawhide from version 4.2.1 to version 5.1.1. The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages depending on maven-plugin-bundle. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep working with updated maven-p

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

Hi Guillem, On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 02:19 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > So this is where I guess I'm missing something. To be able to make > sense of the coredumps there are two things that might end up being > relevant, backtraces and source code. systemd-coredump might already > emit a backtrace,

Re: hamcrest update to 2.2 in Fedora rawhide

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:10 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Hello, > > Next week I'm going to update package hamcrest in Fedora rawhide from > version 1.3 to version 2.2. > > The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages > depending on hamcrest. You may need to rebuild your

Fedora elections voting now open

Voting in the Fedora Linux 34 elections is now open. Go to the Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 3 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections app and on the Community Blog[2]

Re: i686 build OOMing

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:45 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Is disabling debug on i686 an option? > > --- a/vulkan-validation-layers.spec > +++ b/vulkan-validation-layers.spec > @@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ developing applications that use %{name}. > > %build > # Decrease debuginfo verbosity to reduce memory c

[Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210520.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210520.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

gbc3: error: Component not found: &1 gb.desktop.x11

Hi, when compiling xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152 [1] on fedora fc34 & rawhide, i get this error message: + cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152 + /usr/bin/gbc3 -e -a -g -t -p -m gbc3: error: Component not found: &1gb.desktop.x11 [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Erro

Re: When is pappl going to be good enough to replace cups?

On 5/20/21 11:09 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > Thoughts? > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pappl It is a library for printer applications [1], not a substitute for CUPS. CUPS is still present and is going to be. There will be more printer applications coming into Fedora (ps-printer-app f.

Re: gbc3: error: Component not found: &1 gb.desktop.x11

Seems that you need add BR: gambas3-gb-desktop-x11 пт, 21 мая 2021 г., 09:20 Martin Gansser : > Hi, > > when compiling xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152 [1] on fedora fc34 & rawhide, i > get this error message: > > + cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD > + cd xt7-player-mpv-0.33.3152 > + /usr/bin/gbc3 -e -a -g