Re: F35 Change: More flexible use of SSSD fast cache for local users (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexibleLocalUserCache > > == Summary == > Allow to switch SSSD’s fast cache for local users on and off at runtime. Could you please also amend the summary to say how the default will change? > c

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210517.0): ID: 889128 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F35 Change: More flexible use of SSSD fast cache for local users (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:18:50AM + schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexibleLocalUserCache > > > > == Summary == > > Allow to switch SSSD’s fast cache for local users on and off at ru

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210517.0): ID: 889256 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/889256 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests comp

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/17/21 9:53 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17.05.2021 20:50, Jan Drögehoff wrote: >> the Steam runtime ships its own SDL 1.2 so I don't think anything >> will change on that front > > Steam was just an example. There are lots of other proprietary > applications and games without thei

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210517.0): ID: 889272 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17.05.2021 16:19, Ben Cotton wrote: >> In order to help move SDL 1.2 games into the modern world, let's >> replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0. > > What about third-party **proprietary** games from Steam for example? sdl12-compat claims to b

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Ben Cotton wrote: > This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL > 2.0. FYI, it took me just a few minutes of casually browsing commits to spot a memory corruption bug in this code: https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat/commit/4c5e3b22593c4b48ac8129ae2096af5c00569

RPMLint 2.0 released!

Hey all, Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: * RPMLint now is a "normal" Python application and now supports being imported like a standard Python module! This means t

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:00 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are > releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! > Oh whoops, I forgot to include the release URL: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/releases/tag/2.0.0 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Al

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On 18. 05. 21 14:00, Neal Gompa wrote: Hey all, Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: * RPMLint now is a "normal" Python application and now supports being imported li

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 05. 21 14:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are > > releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! > > > > This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: > > >

Package review #1961174

Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ Op

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

You reported my complaints as: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off until it's fixed. If it doesn't display accurate test results, it's not even close to being ready yet. Good gating is good, but bad gating is

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-18)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-05-18 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On 5/18/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Awesome! What is the plan for Fedora? Shall we migrate to rpmlint 2 in >> rawhide? I recall Mirek Suchý had some WIP Fedora config. >> > > Yes, please! The new rpmlint is *way* better than what we have

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > You reported my complaints as: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off until it's > fixed. If it doesn't display accurate test results, it's not even

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:38:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > You reported my complaints as: > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > > > I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off unti

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 10:55 -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:38:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > You reported my complaints as: > > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > > >

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

Dne 18. 05. 21 v 17:05 Susi Lehtola napsal(a): On 5/18/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Awesome! What is the plan for Fedora? Shall we migrate to rpmlint 2 in rawhide? I recall Mirek Suchý had some WIP Fedora config. https://github.com/rpm-sof

Disable annobin on 32 bit Arm while an issue is investigated?

Hello, devel and arm lists! We recently ran into a testsuite failure when building glibc for Rawhide on armv7hl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951492 The test program experienced a hang after a thread was cancelled. So far, it appears that either annobin generated notes or the way

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-18)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-05-18) === Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:00:35 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-05-18/fesco.2021-05-18-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

aom soname bump

Hi, AOM AV1 version 3 has been published a while ago and I am planning to update it in Fedora. Due to a CVE affecting versions prior to 2021-04-07 (CVE-2021-30473), I plan to push this update to ALL STABLE RELEASES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961376 I intend to wait until 3

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC, which will last approximately 36 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-04 22:00UTC'

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/18/21 12:45 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Ben Cotton wrote: This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0. FYI, it took me just a few minutes of casually browsing commits to spot a memory corruption bug in this code: https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/18/21 9:17 PM, Jan Drögehoff wrote: It uses the exact same code as SDL 1.2 which has a version for i386 systems with inline assembly so that might need some eyes looking at it. Actually scratch that I had misinterpreted a contributors response to the issue and it has a completely fresh

Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream. Some notable issues/configurations: - Very old systems (Fedora 32 and earlier) may not be able to update [0] - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1] Here are some highlig

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

*Warning*: Affected package maintainers were not bcc'ed becasue I've recently migrated to Gmail and it doesn't let me bcc nearly 500 email addresses. I'll try to figure out what to do next. The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless some

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 18. 05. 21 22:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: *Warning*: Affected package maintainers were not bcc'ed becasue I've recently migrated to Gmail and it doesn't let me bcc nearly 500 email addresses. I'll try to figure out what to do next. I've managed to re-send the bcc'ed message via Gmail web interf

Building for EPEL-8 and CMake (again)

Hey all- Awhile back I asked about the status of CMake in CentOS so I could build my packages for EPEL-8; they require a version of CMake that is greater than 3.11.4 which is currently available. CentOS Stream has a later version, as does RHEL 8.4. I get that CentOS Stream is the future of Cent

opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

(I've added a few opam devs to CC) On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > opam orphan 1 weeks ago I didn't notice that opam had been orphaned. This package is the tool used for source packaging of OCaml packages unde

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 18. 05. 21 22:24, Marek Polacek wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt grep i

i686 build OOMing

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-ValidationLayers-sdk-1.2.176.1/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/layers && /usr/bin/g++ -DAPI_NAME=\"Vulkan\" -DVK_ENABLE_BETA_EXTENSIONS -DVK_USE_PLATFORM_WAYLAND_KHR -DVK_USE_PLATFORM_WAYLAND_KHX -DVK_USE

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> emacs-auctex orphan 1 weeks > ago > > This one is going to break some non-emacs packages as well because the spec actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview: $ r

Re: i686 build OOMing

On 5/18/2021 4:44 PM, David Airlie wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-ValidationLayers-sdk-1.2.176.1/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/layers && /usr/bin/g++ -DAPI_NAME=\"Vulkan\" -DVK_ENABLE_BETA_EXTENSIONS -DVK_USE_PLATFORM_WAYLA

Re: How to replace the rpm-build package with my own in a mock container

On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 01:30, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > Once again tried rebuilt rpm-build and updated the local metadata and it > worked. > I was just confused that even though there is a mention of the > rpm-build package in the root.log on line 218 [1] > But nowhere is it written where this pa

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

This sounds terrific ! I too can't wait till Fedora adopts it. > * RPMLint includes _many more checks_! Nearly all of the generally However I always have a hard time understanding what the issue caught by RPMLint actually is. I would like to see some library of the checks with the explanation of w

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a): > Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based > Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream. > > - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1] This was Fedora 33 feature. > - Move to cgroup v2 by

Re: Package review #1961174

On 5/18/21 3:19 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. I have started the review. In exchange could you review jpegxl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Licensing guidelines for AppStream project_license

I asked this question a while ago on the packaging mailing list [0], but did not receive any replies. Let me try again here on devel with more subscribers: During the package review of qvge [1], the following question came up: Are the any requirements placed on the contents of AppStream metada

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a): > > Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based > > Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream. > > > > - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 12:06, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase > > > > == Summary == > > This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux, > > shadow-utils) from the Con