Matthew Miller kirjoitti 3.5.2021 klo 17.36:
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:29:54PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Right, but this sub- thread it about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Ah, sorry. I got lost. :)
But now that you mention it, I'd like to see that mig
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210503.0):
ID: 877461 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:06 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a):
Yeah, so:
1) Someone has to remember to do this as part of every release
2) This doesn't do anything about add-on repositories' keys
3) I had pgp keys going all the way to F19, etc…
My approach is slightly awkward
*nod* would you mind add
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210502.0):
ID: 877816 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877816
ID: 877819 Test: x86_64 IoT-d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210503.0):
ID: 877801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
On 28/04/2021 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
big deal. However it's not really feasible to support
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:27 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
> to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
> big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
> maintain several other
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:21 PM Dominique Martinet
> wrote:
> >
> > (added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still
> > valid address)
> >
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:06:00PM +0
Miroslav Suchý writes:
Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:06 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a):
Yeah, so:
1) Someone has to remember to do this as part of every release
2) This doesn't do anything about add-on repositories' keys
3) I had pgp keys going all the way to F19, etc…
My approach is slightly awkward
*
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> LINUX KERNEL --
> Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use of
> Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can now enjoy size reductions
> with Zstd.
Is this email a proposed Fedora chan
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210504.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.17 GiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > LINUX KERNEL --
> > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use
> > of Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can now enjo
Dear Fedorans,
I'm orphaning a couple of packages due to lack of time to maintain them:
ming - Packaged as an optional dependency of wxmacmolplt, has several
open security vulnerabilities and FTBFS against PHP 8. Upstream
unresponsive.
vecmath - Packaged as part of unfinished effort t
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/193 (x86_64), 9/123 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 18:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > [I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora-
> > devel]
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Cross-po
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-05-04 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hello!
I've orphaned
- python-flask-principal
- python-flask-rstpages
- transfered ownership of python-flask-login to jkaluza
Retired
- sidc
- clearlooks-phenix
Best regards,
-- sorki
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:05 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-05 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
There are no nominated bugs and 1 previously accepted bug to be disc
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:58:16PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Here is the proposed release schedule for the next 2 releases:
I assume from the Cc line that this is clang/llvm, right?
> July 27: release/13.x branch created
> July 30: 13.0.0-rc1
> Aug 24: 13.0.0-rc2
> Sep 7: 13.0.0-rc3
> Sep
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:09:09AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Could you comment on the status of repository
> package-maintainer-docs at pagure.io [1]? It looks like it is
> intended to be that migration, I wanted to contribute and started
> with a tiny pull request (to be followed by more sub
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-05-04)
===
Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-05-04/fesco.2021-05-04-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 5/4/21 9:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:58:16PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
Here is the proposed release schedule for the next 2 releases:
I assume from the Cc line that this is clang/llvm, right?
Yes, but I did not mean to send this email to the Fedora list.
Sorr
Planned Outage - mbs.fedoraproject.org - 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-05-05 17:00UT
Hi,
Ny kickstart file has the following:
%include /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-base.ks
%include /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-minimization.ks
But I have noticed that it wants to go into the rawhide repo. That is because
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-base.ks has fedo
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I wondered about that, but it didn't seem like the changes were that
> major. They just dropped support for old pythons and dropped a bunch of
> cruft they had to support them. ;(
For NetworkX, this is the story:
https://github.com/networkx/ne
przemek klosowski via devel writes:
> Is that something we need to worry about? I couldn't think of any new
> rules to impose on repositories, but maybe dnf should have more explicit
> warnings when it sees multiple versions of the same package, or at least
> a way to show such versions.
Or h
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 07:44 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> przemek klosowski via devel writes:
>
> > Is that something we need to worry about? I couldn't think of any new
> > rules to impose on repositories, but maybe dnf should have more explicit
> > warnings when it sees multiple versions of the
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 4.5.2021 klo 19.38:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:09:09AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Could you comment on the status of repository
package-maintainer-docs at pagure.io [1]? It looks like it is
intended to be that migration, I wanted to contribute and started
with a tiny
28 matches
Mail list logo
