No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210429.0):
ID: 873786 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Am 29.04.21 um 21:27 schrieb Joan Moreau via devel:
Isn´t there a muh more systemic (and simpler) process to push a RPM in the
distribution ?
Fedora tries to ship working software. This means there has to be at least one
person who really cares about each Fedora package. All these processes t
KeepassXC comaintainer here.
There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other
quirks with GNOME, etc.
Upstream developers said many times that this only happen with Fedora users.
Myself I do use KDE Spin and
Germano Massullo kirjoitti 30.4.2021 klo 13.23:
KeepassXC comaintainer here.
There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other
quirks with GNOME, etc.
Upstream developers said many times that this only happe
On 4/30/21 6:23 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
KeepassXC comaintainer here.
There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other
quirks with GNOME, etc.
Upstream developers said many times that this only happen
Il 30/04/21 14:11, Robert Marcano via devel ha scritto:
> The bug about input fields not able to take text input happen
> occasionally on passwords fields on XCA.
What is XCA?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
After running
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34
and downloading all files, I got the following warning
warning:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-e21c25ac3662d294/packages/fstrm-0.6.0-4.fc34.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, ID key 45719a39: NOKEY
Why this package does not hav
On 4/30/21 8:17 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 30/04/21 14:11, Robert Marcano via devel ha scritto:
The bug about input fields not able to take text input happen
occasionally on passwords fields on XCA.
What is XCA?
Another Fedora package that uses QT
https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/
_
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:17 PM Martin Kolman wrote:
>
> For that reason we in the Anaconda development team feel like it's a
> good time to finally drop the "Allow SSH root login with password" from
> the Anaconda GUI.
>
> If you are aware of some critical Fedora/Fedora spin usecase that
> depend
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210428.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210430.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 164.41 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Thanks but I am really scratching my head to try to understand all this:
1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
2 - What does it mean to "block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR [1] tracking bug" ?
So far, I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Any help very welcome
Th
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:09:12PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> Now fast forward to today, it's 2021, any use cases that needed
> password based root login via SSH had 2 more years to migrate while the
> amount of password guessing attacks certainly didn't get any lower.
Not everything is exposed
On 29.04.2021 21:27, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
Isn´t there a muh more systemic (and simpler) process to push a RPM in
the distribution ?
No. With great power comes great responsibility.
Each candidate must, at least, prove that they are familiar with the
Fedora packaging guidelines.
--
S
On 30.04.2021 15:16, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
2 - What does it mean to "block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracking bug" ?
Open your Bugzilla package review ticket
On 30.04.2021 12:23, Germano Massullo wrote:
There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other
quirks with GNOME, etc.
There are a lot of issues with Mutter and Qt5[1]. That's why the Qt
upstream forces XC
On 29.04.2021 22:09, Martin Kolman wrote:
At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option
called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password
configuration screen.
+1 for this change. Remote login as root with password is very insecure
and should be dropped.
On 30.04.2021 15:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Not everything is exposed to the internet. Please leave the option,
disabled by default and with a suitable warning if you like.
Why are you still using passwords in 2021? SSH keys are much more secure
and easier to use.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
Hi!
Le 4/29/21 à 10:09 PM, Martin Kolman a écrit :
For that reason we in the Anaconda development team feel like it's a
good time to finally drop the "Allow SSH root login with password" from
the Anaconda GUI.
Yes!
I've thought to it in the past when I've submitted originally the "Lock root
* Joan Moreau via devel [30/04/2021 14:16] :
>
> 1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
We use FAS (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/eseyman/) to manage
Fedora developer accounts. FAS has the notion of groups, one of which is
the packager group (https://accounts.fedorapro
Il 30/04/21 15:33, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel ha scritto:
> On 30.04.2021 12:23, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in
>> using KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written,
>> other quirks with GNOME, etc.
>
> There are a lot of is
Hi,
On 4/30/21 3:33 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 30.04.2021 12:23, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
>> KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other quirks
>> with GNOME, etc.
>
> There are a lot o
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:37:54PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 30.04.2021 15:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >Not everything is exposed to the internet. Please leave the option,
> >disabled by default and with a suitable warning if you like.
>
> Why are you still using passwords i
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/189 (x86_64), 11/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
Il 30/04/21 16:23, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
> I tend to agree, it seems this downstream patch breaks at least 3 apps:
>
> 1. KeepassXC
> 2. calibre
> 3. audacious
I think also nextcloud-client. I have been receiving bugreports about
quirks on GNOME
___
On 4/30/21 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Because distributing SSH keys to temporary VMs is hard? Not
everything is a long-lived machine connected to the internet.
+1
in addition to, e.g., an _initial_ setup on a remote/headless box at a VPS.
_
Hi all-
I’m trying to build a package under EPEL-8[1] but it fails due to
CMake being too old:
CMake 3.15.1 or higher is required. You are running version 3.11.4.
Is there any plans on bringing CMake up to the current version of Fedora
(3.19.7) or at the very least to something >= 3.
On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:26:49 AM -0500, Ron Olson
wrote:
Is there any plans on bringing CMake up to the current version of
Fedora
(3.19.7) or at the very least to something >= 3.15.1?
Good news: looks like CentOS Stream 8 currently has CMake 3.18.2:
https://git.centos.org/rpms/cmake/commit
On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:09 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> Hi!
> At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option
> called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password
> configuration screen.
>
> This is how it looks like at the moment, on latest Fedora Rawhide
>
Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
On 30 Apr 2021, at 10:33, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:26:49 AM -0500, Ron Olson
wrote:
Is there any plans on bringing CMake up to the current version of
Fedora
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:00, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
> presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
>
>
Cmake is not in EPEL but in RHEL. The current version for 8.3 is
./rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms/Packages/c/cmake-3.11.4-3.el8.x86
Il 30/04/21 15:16, Joan Moreau via devel ha scritto:
> Thanks but I am really scratching my head to try to understand all this:
>
> 1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
>
> 2 - What does it mean to "block the
> [FE-NEEDSPONSOR](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-N
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> After running
> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34
> and downloading all files, I got the following warning
> warning:
> /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-e21c25ac3662d294/packages/fstrm-0.6.0-4.fc34.x86_64.rpm:
> Header
On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:59:22 AM -0500, Ron Olson
wrote:
Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
No, content flow is the reverse in el8:
RHEL 8 (upstream) -> CentOS Stream 8 (downstream)
Whereas for el9 the flow is:
Cent
On 29.04.21 17:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It seems like it would be worth having them. Unfortunately the patch
numbers of the base patches clash with the ones for mingw-gcc, so to
be neat we'd need to renumber the mingw-gcc ones.
I don't see any problem with that.
When you finish your bu
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:26, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 30/04/21 15:16, Joan Moreau via devel ha scritto:
>
> Thanks but I am really scratching my head to try to understand all this:
>
> 1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
>
> 2 - Wha
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:35, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:59:22 AM -0500, Ron Olson
> wrote:
> > Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
> > presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
>
> No, content flow is the reverse in el8:
>
> RHEL 8 (upstr
On 30.04.2021 16:09, Germano Massullo wrote:
Could you please suggest me how I could implement a patch?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ksnip/blob/rawhide/f/ksnip-wayland-workaround.patch
Would you do it in the .desktop file?
Patching desktop file is not a good idea. It can break lots of
On 30.04.2021 16:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
Maybe instead the QT_QPA_PLATFORM environment option can be set in the
KDE wayland session, so that Wayland is used there while leaving GNOME3
alone ?
KDE Wayland already uses native qt-wayland backend. No changes needed.
I tend to agree, it seems thi
On 30.04.2021 16:23, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Because distributing SSH keys to temporary VMs is hard?
Kickstart + Ansible will fix all these issues.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 5:18 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30.04.2021 16:23, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Because distributing SSH keys to temporary VMs is hard?
>
> Kickstart + Ansible will fix all these issues.
Or, perhaps, cloud-init, for those using that approach.
___
Hi,
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 18:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> [I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora-
> devel]
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects.
Note that in t
Missing expected images:
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/19 (x86_64)
ID: 874446 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874446
ID: 874453 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 15:23 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:37:54PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> > On 30.04.2021 15:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Not everything is exposed to the internet. Please leave the
> > > option,
> > > disabled by default an
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 20:42 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 15:23 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:37:54PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > > On 30.04.2021 15:21, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Not everything is exposed to the inte
I normally would complain about taking options away from users, but as I
typically use ssh for root *anyway*, I felt this wasn't appropriate
(although I have a friend who never uses ssh keys, always
password-over-ssh).
I would, however, ask that the config file have a commented out option
that re
I'd like to report what I think is an unresponsive maintainer for the
genders package. Per
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
I filed this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955798
There do not appear to be any other bugs open f
Trey,
Not quite unresponsive, just not as interested 😉
If you want to help maintaining genders that would be helpful. I’m the only one
I think managing the package right now, so getting another person would be
good. I’m going to add you as admin to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/genders so
Apologies, my indication of unresponsive was that I got no response when I
emailed genders-maintain...@fedoraproject.org and
genders-ow...@fedoraproject.org last week. Maybe that was not the best way to
make contact.
Thanks for adding me to the package, I'll see about getting EPEL8 builds goin
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent on the agenda, so let's take a well-earned break
after the F34 release!
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Perhaps we could improve the wiki page on Joining** to make it more clear
what the process is like?
I read through the guidelines and the Joining page a couple times, and only
near the end does it state that Joining is more about, well, joining as a
person than publishing a package. I believe it t
For what it's worth, I'm trying to join and have a package included and
there are definitely some areas I would like to improve. Should we make a
thread on their mailing list?
On Fri., Apr. 30, 2021, 5:50 p.m. Bryce Carson,
wrote:
> Perhaps we could improve the wiki page on Joining** to make it
This one works, and cya all at the last day of the Release Party for 34 in
some hours
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Fedora compose checker <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 3 of 43 required tests failed
> openQA
Bryce Carson kirjoitti 1.5.2021 klo 3.21:
For what it's worth, I'm trying to join and have a package included and
there are definitely some areas I would like to improve. Should we make a
thread on their mailing list?
On Fri., Apr. 30, 2021, 5:50 p.m. Bryce Carson,
wrote:
Perhaps we could imp
> Am 29.04.2021 um 22:09 schrieb Martin Kolman :
>
> Hi!
> At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option
> called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password
> configuration screen.
> ...
> Note that the checkbox is not ticked by default, the user needs to
54 matches
Mail list logo
