Fedora-Rawhide-20210428.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 11 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 32/189 (x86_64), 26/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-2

mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

Hi Sandro, Are you planning to update mingw-gcc to 11.1? The main gcc package was updated to this version yesterday: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/commits/rawhide If not, then I would like to do it if you have no objections. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat htt

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210428.0): ID: 872895 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Unretiring and maintaining the Fish Fillets NG game

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nikolay Nikolov wrote: > What are the next steps for unretiring these two packages and > maintaining them? > Hey Nikolay, thanks for taking care of Fish Fillets, it's a great game (and also from my country). Here I found the instructions for unretiring a package:

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210429.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210429.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Fedora-IoT-35-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210411.0): ID: 873134 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/873134 ID: 873135 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostre

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes to the macro subsystem internals have been quite large, and while it's supposed to be b

Re: Fedora-Legal-README.txt in installation media outdated?

On 28. 04. 21 22:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/ with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso Mount it and see Fedora-Legal-README.txt in the image. There are many Fedora

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210428.0): ID: 873167 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi Hans, On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Also I hope it is ok if I pick your brain a bit on a java > packaging issue which I've been having. > > I maintain a couple of java leave packages (games) + some deps > which AFAIK are only used by these games. > > One of these deps

Spin maintainers attention required! Anaconda keyboard layout switching needs to change

Hi everyone, I've just filed a bug with all the details about the topic so we can start discussion there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955025 I gave a short summary here. The libxklavier library will be deprecated from a future Fedora (it doesn't mean Fedora 35!). Anaconda and

Re: Spin maintainers attention required! Anaconda keyboard layout switching needs to change

Adding anaconda-devel list too. On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 12:26 +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just filed a bug with all the details about the topic so we can > start discussion there: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955025 > > > I gave a short summary h

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 4/29/21 11:58 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes to the macro subsystem internals have been qu

Re: New RPM submission

Thank you Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? On 2021-04-27 22:19, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Joan Moreau [27/04/2021 20:51] : Hi Emmanuel I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") That looks like a recu

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

Hi Rich Last attempt stranded on [1], I haven't tried since but looks like the bug is still open. If you want to give it a go, please do! Many thanks Sandro [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97618 On 29.04.21 10:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Hi Sandro, Are you planning to u

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 29. 04. 21 14:23, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/29/21 11:58 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes t

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:44:12PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi Rich > > Last attempt stranded on [1], I haven't tried since but looks like > the bug is still open. If you want to give it a go, please do! Things seem to be going better here. I'm hitting: error: File not found: /home/rjones/r

Re: New RPM submission

在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： > Thank you > Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? FYI: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Qiyu Yan GPG keyid: 0x4FC914F065F2DF12 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared object in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not support that, and probably never will, at least not in its current shell-based incarnation. So I came up with this: %{lua: local wrapper = rpm.expand("%{SO

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. What do you think? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpres

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On 29.04.21 17:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. What do you think? Yep, I also had to add g++-mapper-server, and the build succeeds. I'm performing a full chain gcc (bootst

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:22:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 29.04.21 17:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you > >earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. > > > >What do you think? > > Yep, I also had to add g++-m

Re: Unretiring and maintaining the Fish Fillets NG game

On 4/29/21 11:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nikolay Nikolov > wrote: What are the next steps for unretiring these two packages and maintaining them? Hey Nikolay, thanks for taking care of Fish Fillets, it's a great game (and also

REMINDER: Fedora Linux 32 End of Life on 2021-05-25

Fedora Linux 32 will reach EOL on Tuesday 25 May 2021. On this day, we will close all of the F32 bugs which remain open. You have a few weeks remaining to submit updates, if you have any, before the Fedora 32 release becomes unsupported. As a reminder, updates that are still in testing when EOL is

F35 Change: Node.js 16.x by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16 == Summary == The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the 16.x series. As with 14.x, 12.x, 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 35 will carry 16.x as the default Node.js interpreter for the system. The 14.x and 12.x interpreters will

Re: New RPM submission

THank you Isn´t there a muh more systemic (and simpler) process to push a RPM in the distribution ? On 2021-04-29 14:51, Qiyu Yan wrote: 在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： Thank you Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? FYI: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_spo

RPM name collisions

Few weeks ago we had an announcement of a Python supply chain hack where people supplied libraries with names matching some private library names, which took precedence and overrode those private libraries, giving the hackers control. Now, the name collisions are built-in into RPM, because tha

Intention to dropping the the "Allow SSH root login with password" option from the installer GUI

Hi! At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password configuration screen. This is how it looks like at the moment, on latest Fedora Rawhide installer image: https://m4rtink.fedorapeople.org/screenshots/fedora/

Re: Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

Hi Florian, On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared > object > in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not > support that, and probably never will, at least not in its current > shell-base

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi, On 4/29/21 12:00 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Hans de Goede wrote: >> Also I hope it is ok if I pick your brain a bit on a java >> packaging issue which I've been having. >> >> I maintain a couple of java leave packages (games) + some deps >> whi

Re: F35 Change: Node.js 16.x by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 29. 04. 21 21:14, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16 == Summary == The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the 16.x series. As with 14.x, 12.x, 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 35 will carry 16.x as the default Node.js interpreter for the sy

Re: RPM name collisions

przemek klosowski via devel wrote: > but the recent trend is to loosen up and increase the > repository set: rpmfusion, ROCm, packages-microsoft-com-prod are likely > to be used because they contain useful software. IMHO, everyone using the Microsoft repository is on their own. Isn't the whole re

Re: RPM name collisions

Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 22:04, przemek klosowski via devel a écrit : >... > For completness, here are the remaining strange cases: > > openhantek.x86_64 2.06-1.fc31rpmfusion-nonfree > openhantek.x86_64 3.2-1.fc34 fedora I've fixed this one on f35+ for rpmfusion-nonfree. Package moved to

Re: Fedora-Legal-README.txt in installation media outdated?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 04. 21 22:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: > > > If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/ > > > with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso >

Re: New RPM submission

(fixed quoting) On Thursday, 29 April 2021 at 21:27, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > On 2021-04-29 14:51, Qiyu Yan wrote: > > 在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： > > > > > Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? [...] > > FYI: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored

Fedora-IoT-34-20210429.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210423.0): ID: 873671 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/873671 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-

Re: plocate?

(added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still valid address) Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:06:00PM +: > Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default > locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient. > Would

Re: Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

* Mark Wielaard: > Hi Florian, > > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared >> object >> in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not >> support that, and probably never will, at least not