Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 21:19:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary > maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: We see a problem with this construct: Source0:    %{pypi_source} It used to work: $ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | grep Source0 Source0: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/a/asyncpg/asyncpg-

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210427.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210426.0): ID: 870728 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

* Fabio Valentini [26/04/2021 21:19] : > > I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't get me started on the horrid Java ecosystem. Thank you for all the work you've done, Fabio. Emmanuel _

Re: Gnome BZ untouched for years #1414539

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:38 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > > > > How many more years can I expect it will take to resolve or at least > > seriously examine this following BZ? > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414539 > > > > Does

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 4/27/21 10:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: We see a problem with this construct: Source0:    %{pypi_source} It used to work: $ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | grep Source0 Source0: https://files.pythonhos

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I > had been on 9.6.7-1. > > Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I > have version 16, but it wants 1022. I was surprised by this myself yes

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210427.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210426.0): ID: 870854 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

Hi, My name is Anatoly Vildemanov, I work at Nvidia on UCX opensource project https://github.com/openucx/ucx My general responsibility is CI and CD And I will do packages UCX for fedora For this could you please add me to "packager" group like member Anatoly Vildemanov Sr. Software Engineer, Dev

Re: question was: What do we think about always autoreconfing? was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:27 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >Hijacking this thread originally about > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > >

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

On 27.04.2021 02:23, Ravindra Kumar wrote: It looks like KDE in Fedora 34 is not honoring open-vm-tools autostart script in /etc/xdg/autostart/vmware-user.desktop. GNOME seems to work fine. This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, IMO. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit

Re: Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

On 27.04.2021 12:11, Anatoly Vildemanov wrote: And I will do packages UCX for fedora For this could you please add me to “packager” group like member Hello and welcome to Fedora. Please follow this procedure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Sincerely,

Self Introduction Sergei Petrosian

Hello Fedora developers, I am a fairly new member of the team maintaining Ansible roles for managing linux - namely this repo [1] and this RPM [2] and would like to introduce myself to you. In the past

Re: Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

Dne 25. 04. 21 v 0:01 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): - (easy) supply a script/wrapper like Miroslav is showing as a part of the fedora-packager rpm package Yeah, we talked about this a while back, I am not sure why it wasn't implemented. ;( Would someone care to submit a PR to fedora-packager for

F34 update experience

Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the dnf system-upgrade. Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue is that the installation hangs a long time with no evidence of activity

Fedora Linux 34 is available now!

I'm excited to announce the official release of Fedora Linux 34! The beta version has been very popular this time around, so I know you are excited too. Please join me in thanking the thousands of people who work in the Fedora Project every year and who make this amazing collaborative community o

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:29:52PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > > > OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to > > > sip5. I'm planning to build eve

Re: Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

In the meantime, I created a simple BASH script that you can use: https://pagure.io/fedora-kinit/blob/main/f/fedora-kinit $ fedora-kinit --help Acquire a Kerberos ticket-granting ticket for Fedora Usage: /home/sgallagh/.local/bin/fedora-kinit [-u|--user ] [-h|--help] -u, --user: Fedora account na

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:26 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I will orphan all Java packages I am the main admin of, later today. I've adopted the majority of Java packages that were orphaned by Fabio, primarily those that are related to Maven or Ant. I've been maintaining numerous Java packages in

Re: Fedora Linux 34 is available now!

> I'm excited to announce the official release of Fedora Linux 34! > > The beta version has been very popular this time around, so I know you are > excited too. Please join me in thanking the thousands of people who work in > the Fedora Project every year and who make this amazing collaborative >

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi Mikolaj, Mikolaj Izdebski writes: > 5) automating the process of bootstrapping Maven and Ant with related > components, so that new versions can be imported and built > reproducibly and with consistent quality. You might want to take a look at openSUSE's maven package: https://build

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On 27. 04. 21 16:49, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:26 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: I will orphan all Java packages I am the main admin of, later today. I've adopted the majority of Java packages that were orphaned by Fabio, primarily those that are related to Maven or Ant. I

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary > maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't get me started on the h

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

Tom Stellard wrote: > I don't really want to get in into a debate about specific packages, but > your general point that upstream preference may not be best for Fedora is > a good one, and it's why the proposal was changed from "packagers should > use upstream preference" to "packagers should use b

Re: F34 update experience

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the > dnf system-upgrade. > > Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 5:18 PM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Hi Mikolaj, > > Mikolaj Izdebski writes: > > > 5) automating the process of bootstrapping Maven and Ant with related > > components, so that new versions can be imported and built > > reproducibly and with consistent quality. > > You

Re: F34 update experience

As I said, the machine has an ssd. But it has a very large number of packages. It's used for development so has lots of devel pkgs, and a large selection of the live. On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 12:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -040

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-27)

Sorry for the late agenda. Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-04-27 17:00 UTC'

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/27/21 8:52 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Tom Stellard wrote: I don't really want to get in into a debate about specific packages, but your general point that upstream preference may not be best for Fedora is a good one, and it's why the proposal was changed from "packagers should use up

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula database? Normally I would use /usr/libexec/bacula/update_mysql_tables but I found in this case that it didn't work because it

Re: F34 update experience

Dnia Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:08:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napisał(a): > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the >

Re: Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-27)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-04-27) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:01:49 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-27/fesco.2021-04-27-17.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: F34 update experience

rpm -qa | wc - reports 5939 On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:08:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > napisał(a): > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is

[Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long to get around to it. While looking into a preset request, I realized that the guidelines[2] do not say anything at all about enabling default services that a

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

I created a Fedora Workstation issue to track the progress, and figure out if any or all of the desktops want to do full preemption by default. https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

New Mock release v2.10

I'm pleased to announce that we have a new (small) Mock bugfix release. Worth mentioning is that there are many new config files in `mock-core-configs` package. Release notes are here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.10 Updates: Fedora 34: https://b

Re: New RPM submission

Hi Emmanuel I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian" -> Lead some error ("fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian") I filed a "bug" on

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

> I commented in the bug with some debugging steps to try. Thanks Rex. We can discuss this further in the bug. Thanks, Ravindra ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

> This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, IMO. Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. Thanks, Ravindra ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:03 +, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, > > IMO. > > Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. > I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. Yeah, you might want t

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On 4/27/21 1:52 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 >> "Steven A. Falco" wrote: >>> Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula >>> database? >> >> Normally I would use /usr/libexec/bacula/update_mysql_tab

Re: [Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 21:14, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to > bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long > to get around to it. > > While looking into a preset request, I realized that the guidelin

Re: New RPM submission

* Joan Moreau [27/04/2021 20:51] : > > Hi Emmanuel > > I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere > > Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") That looks like a recurring kerberos issue. https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2063 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:30 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I created a Fedora Workstation issue to track the progress, and figure > out if any or all of the desktops want to do full preemption by > default. > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228 Unless I missed a commit, it is x86_64 only

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd be able and willing to assist here too, thanks for working on it! As far as sip6 goes, I'd venture the adjustment from v5 to v6 will be smaller than what v4 to v5 was. Yeah, agreed. Happy to work with you both and get this done. :) Okay, I'll wor

Orphaning xfontsel

I've orphaned xfontsel, one of the many possibly-older-than-thou X utilities. From the man page: xfontsel - point and click selection of X11 font names So it does support both point *and* click. Futuristic stuff indeed ;) Package is here if you want to take it: https://src.fedoraproje

Fedora-Legal-README.txt in installation media outdated?

If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/ with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso Mount it and see Fedora-Legal-README.txt in the image. There are many Fedora 31 things show up, should this file be updated on each release cycle? (Maybe not, unless someone lik