On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:51:35AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 04. 21 10:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210419.0):
ID: 862272 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
TL;DR what you are trying to do is to actually reverse many security measures
we added. It is perhaps acceptable for debugging but hardly for real generic
system.
- using memory-hard function increases cost of dictionary and brute-force
attacks
You can always decrease amount of memory neede
Hi!
> - fedora messaging - https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-messaging
Hmm, I don't think we're using PDC in fedora messaging, but I might be wrong.
Where did you find it?
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:13 AM Adam Saleh wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out
> possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project
> has gone unmaintained for years [1].
>
> We plan to share what we find out in our
> https
Hi,
Thanks a lot, these info are very helpful.
Better to keep it for debugging for now, and ask users to use it very carefully.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:54 PM Milan Broz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR what you are trying to do is to actually reverse many security measures
> we added. It is perhaps ac
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210419.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210420.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 140
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 25.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-04-20 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
OLD: Fedora-34-20210419.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210420.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 4/19/21 11:13 AM, Adam Saleh wrote:
Hi everyone,
ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out
possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project
has gone unmaintained for years [1].
We plan to share what we find out in our
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.
On 20/04/2021 08:05, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Kairui Song schrieb am 19.04.2021 um 12:00 in
> Nachricht
> :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently trying to add kdump support for systemd with full‑disk
>> LUKS encryption. vmcores contain sensitive data so they should also be
>> protected, and network dump
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/189 (x86_64), 10/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:06 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-04-21 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
The following bugs are on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting:
* Cpu
Hi -
Björn Persson writes:
> · How is it verified that files received from debuginfo servers have not
> been tampered with?
Following up further to this, we're planning to add optional client-side
hash-verification of cached content, to provide some protection against
tampering:
https://sour
Thank you for update. 'labwc' built
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66343993
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210406.0):
ID: 863282 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/863282
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:57:34AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> GNOME Software uses it:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/blob/master/plugins/fedora-pkgdb-collections/gs-plugin-fedora-pkgdb-collections.c
>
> Absent of something better, Plasma Discover will too.
Thats actually not
Rebuilt :)! Thank you for the update!
Le 19/04/2021 à 19:01, Aleksei Bavshin a écrit :
wlroots-0.13 is now available in rawhide.
The compatibility issues are resolved via `wlroots0.12` package which
will be installed on update if there is anything that depends on
`libwlroots.so.7`. No rebuilds
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 2/189 (x86_64), 2/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210419.n.0):
ID: 862944 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/862944
ID: 863002 Test: aarch
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210418.0):
ID: 863382 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/863382
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
Congratulations, this change impacted tons of packages! That's also a
nice step towards more explicit build dependencies. I understood that
it's also the purpose of the pyproject.toml file ;-)
Victor
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> we successfully pus
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2595 F35 Change: Erlang 24
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2595
APPROVED (+5, 0, 0)
= Meeting
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-20/fesco.2021-04-20-17.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2
While trying to collect a backtrace for org.gnome.Tetravex, I got this in gdb:
===
Downloading separate debug info for /lib64/liblzma.so.5...
Download failed: Timer expired. Continuing without debug info for
/lib64/libbrotlicommon.so.1.
Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libbrotlicommon.so.1
23 matches
Mail list logo
