Fedora-Cloud-33-20210405.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210403.0): ID: 842560 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210405.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210404.0): ID: 842585 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/842585 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_6

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

2021-04-05 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > It should be possible, however, to mark the images folder +C even if it > wouldn't affect existing images. > > It is. > What I meant, is that it could be marked +C even for existing ins

Re: matio: Not announced soname change in stable branch

2021-04-05 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
My apologies; 1.5.18 fixes a few CVEs, and the subsequent releases fixed regressions. I'm usually much more scrupulous about soname changes. I've added versioning to the solib's %files line in the spec, and will take care of the broken packages. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers ---

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210405.n.0 changes

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210404.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210405.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 22 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.14 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora-IoT-35-20210405.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 10/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210404.0): ID: 842977 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210405.n.0 changes

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-34-20210404.n.1 NEW: Fedora-34-20210405.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 195 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 30.34 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

F35 Change: Erlang 24 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-04-05 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_24 == Summary == Update Erlang/OTP to version 24. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]] * Email: lemen...@gmail.com, erl...@lists.fedorapro

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

2021-04-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy > wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> > It should be possible, however, to mark the images folder +C even if it >> wouldn't affect existing images. >> >> It is. >> > >

Fedora-Rawhide-20210405.n.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/189 (x86_64), 25/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20

Fedora-34-20210405.n.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/189 (x86_64), 7/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210404.n.1): ID: 843049 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/843049 ID: 843055 Test: x86_64 Workstat

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

2021-04-05 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw >>> wrote: >>> >>> > It should be possible, however, to mark the images folde

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

2021-04-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a): On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote: On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run as root by

FedoraRespin-33-updates-20210405.0 compose check report

2021-04-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/37 (x86_64) ID: 843419 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/843419 ID: 843423 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Upgrade Test Day 2021-04-07

2021-04-05 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, As we come closer to Fedora 34 release dates, it's time to test upgrades. Fedora 34 has a lot of changesets [0] and it becomes essential that we test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line. As a part of this test day[1], we will test upgrading from a full updated, F32 a

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

2021-04-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:12 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote:

[Test-Announce] [Test Day] Fedora 34 Audio Test Day 2021-04-09

2021-04-05 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, There is a recent proposal to replace the PulseAudio daemon with a functionally compatible implementation based on PipeWire[0]. This means that all existing clients using the PulseAudio client library will continue to work as before, as well as applications shipped as Flatpak. The test da

Fedora 34 Final Freeze

2021-04-05 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi all, Tomorrow, April 6th 2020, is an important day on the Fedora 34 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Tomorrow we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' a

Re: matio: Not announced soname change in stable branch

2021-04-05 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Updates are now in flight for kst, libASL, openmeeg, and vips, for f34 and f33. gtatool is retired and FTBFS, so I left it alone. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton

can't login FAS

2021-04-05 Thread Honggang LI
Hi, After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message. = 500 Internal Server Error Could not convert return value of the view callable function pyramid_fas_openid.view.verify_openid into a response object. The value returned was None. You may have