Fedora-Cloud-33-20210403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210401.0): ID: 840821 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840821 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_6

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210401.0): ID: 840824 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Depict: package dependency visualizer

On 2021-04-01 at 15:54 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:13 AM Łukasz Posadowski > wrote: > > Thank You. It should be really helpful with VM migrations, by > > tracking 3rd party packages and leftover dependencies. I'm > > trying to > > run it on RHEL 8 and it is working on Pyt

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210401.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 110 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.44 MiB Size of dropped packages:160.37 KiB

Fedora-IoT-35-20210403.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210331.0): ID: 841673 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841673 ID: 841677

gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm surprised this wasn't already implemented. Since the folder is created on the fly in the user's home directory this can't be easily fixed through packaging.

Fedora-Rawhide-20210403.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 9/189 (x86_64), 16/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

Fedora-34-20210403.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 12/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0): ID: 841407 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841407 ID: 841413 Test: x8

[heads up] libgsasl upgrade from 1.8.1 to 1.10.0

Hello! I am going to upgrade libgsasl for Fedora 35. The last version available in Fedora 1.8.1 is more than 9 years old so it's time to move up. It should be backwards-compatible upgrade but still it's a 9 years gap so beware. Potentially affected packages: erlang-esasl-0:0.1-29.20120116git665c

[Heads up] python-sqlobject upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.9.1

Hello! Turned out that some basic functionality no longer wiorks even with python3.9 available in Fedora 33 (see rhbz #1896975). I am going to upgrade it up to 3.9.1 version where compatibility with Python3 is ensured. I will upgrade Rawhide, F-34 branches. Despite of a version gap should be a co

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. > > As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm > surprised this wasn't already implemented. > It is implemented. https://listman.redhat.com/ar