Hi,
My name is Michal Josef Spacek.
I am a Perl programmer and Red Hat employee.
I have been supporting Perl packaging in Red Hat.
I am interested in Perl programming, Wikidata, projects of Wikimedia
Foundation, data processing.
CPAN account: https://metacpan.org/author/SKIM
personal homepage: ht
On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
[snip]
Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, but there is a
more elegant solution I'd like to propose:
What if one can declaratively set the required R
Dnia Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 10:56:32AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napisał(a):
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:08:19AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >
> > > Notification via sms is... not too secure. ;(
> > > https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3g8wb/hacker-got-my-texts-16-dollars-sakari-netnumber
> >
> > I d
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> >> Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, but there is a
> >> more ele
On 3/30/21 12:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
[snip]
Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, bu
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:33:14 +0200
Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 29/03/2021 11:49, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:13:08 +0100
> > Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22/02/2021 22:43, Dan Horák wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:26 -
> >>> "Tom Seewald" wrote:
> >
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As I noted in the original email, "I will not speculate that this is any
> more than a coincidence". I don't want to make either assumptions or
> accusations, you do a huge amount of work and everybody here understands
> that.
Oh co
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:36:05AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Looking at what people post, I think I can summarize it concisely:
> people either love him or they hate him.
That is certainly not the case; I neither love nor hate him, although I do
try to make an effort to love all human beings,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:36 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alexander Bokovoy"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:06:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail buil
On 30/03/2021 16:11, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> As I noted in the original email, "I will not speculate that this is any
>> more than a coincidence". I don't want to make either assumptions or
>> accusations, you do a huge amount of
> We already have several Linux distros available and more are incoming weekly,
> and we want
> to have a polished Fedora experience as well. While we have Fedora on the
> list, we
> submitted our trademark request and are working through the details and would
> like to
> invite you for further
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it
means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the
update when I submit package updates that need them. I would prefer the
behavio
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:08 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
> for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it means
> I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the update
> when
On ti, 30 maalis 2021, Ian McInerney wrote:
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it
means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the
update when I submit package upda
On 30/03/2021 16:17, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:36:05AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Looking at what people post, I think I can summarize it concisely:
>> people either love him or they hate him.
>
> That is certainly not the case; I neither love nor hate him, although
Il 30/03/21 17:07, Ian McInerney ha scritto:
> Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in
> Bodhi for builds I submit to rawhide?
Short answer: no.
> I find it very inconvenient because it means I can't add the
> appropriate bugzilla references/description to the update w
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so will not be present in the final gcc-11.1.0 release.
See https://bugzilla.red
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
%postun
if [ "$1" -ge "1" ] ; then # Upgrade
dnscrypt-proxy -service install --config
On 3/30/21 1:11 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
%postun
if [ "$1" -ge "1" ] ; then # Up
On 3/30/21 1:17 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 3/30/21 1:11 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to
display a message to my users to indicate they need to update the
config file with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:11:16PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to
> display a message to my users to indicate they need to update the
> config file with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
>
> %postun
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> There is no good way to do this.
This is one of those cases where I occasionally
miss a mainframe fix update feature to prevent
certain bad automated results.
In SMP/E, there was the concept of HOLD's for
a fix. There were a
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:11 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
> a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
> with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
>
> %postun
> if
There will be an outage starting at 2021-04-01 19:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-04-01 19:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be updating and rebooting var
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:54:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > There is no good way to do this.
>
> This is one of those cases where I occasionally
> miss a mainframe fix update feature to prevent
> certain bad automa
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
wrote:
> I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and
> deployment not only to Fedora on the deskop, but to various distributions
> of
> "CentOS" or
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:54:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > There is no good way to do this.
> >
> > This is one of those cases where
It says all the pull request checks have passed but they haven't done them yet.
Unfortunately.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
> wrote:
> > I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> > "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and
> > deployment not on
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:30:33AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> Could you please explain where you want to do it? Noggin (Fedora
> Accounts app) does handle the login itself, not FreeIPA. In the context
> of what Fedora contributors interact with, FreeIPA is only directly
> exposed via Kerb
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
> intended, and so will not be present in the final gcc-11.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > >python2.7churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner
> >
> > I was curious. The error is:
> >
> >
OLD: Fedora-34-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 21
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.88 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210329.0):
ID: 836946 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/836946
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_6
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:56 PM Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless the
> exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will make
> the change in a week time.
Final freeze begins a week from today. Even though the chan
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210329.0):
ID: 836923 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 5/178 (x86_64), 40/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837005 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837005
ID: 837031
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://open
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:19 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
> > wrote:
> > > I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> > > "development" process vers
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:14 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:56 PM Zdenek Pytela wrote:
>
> > We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless
> the exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will
> make the change in a week time.
>
>
41 matches
Mail list logo
