No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210316.0):
ID: 817811 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/817811
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:44:21PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On ti, 16 maalis 2021, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking
> > them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
that system administrators run explicitly to make changes to those
files.
Thanks,
Flor
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210316.0):
ID: 817976 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Is there any way to proceed for rebuilt gcc SRPM without C support ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/
Sandro Mani kirjoitti 17.3.2021 klo 11.17:
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
I have never done a package review before, but looking at the spec file,
I think this could be
Dne 16. 03. 21 v 18:22 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
Il 16/03/21 17:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
Hi everybody,
I've realized that there's a big mismatch between the permissions that
are necessary and the immediate impact for orphaning and retiring a
package:
orphan:
- is reversible by
Dne 17. 03. 21 v 11:05 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Sandro Mani kirjoitti 17.3.2021 klo 11.17:
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
I have never done a package review before,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 38.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-03-17 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
Hey all,
I wanted to highlight something that may be interesting to the
community: the introduction of a new tool by Mageia's ManaTools team:
ManaFirewall[1].
The ManaFirewall tool is a rewrite of the drakfirewall tool that has
been part of the Mandriva/Mageia Control Center for decades. The old
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210315.0):
ID: 818365 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818365
ID: 8183
Hello!
We are pleased to announce that today, March 13 2020, a new Copr release landed
production. The list of user visible changes is in the release notes document:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2021-03-17.html
Namely we introduced Fedora Review feature, and we plan to re
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 14/176 (x86_64), 15/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210316.n.1):
ID: 818124 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://ope
OLD: Fedora-34-20210316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 12/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210316.n.0):
ID: 818411 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818411
ID: 818474 Test: x8
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2021-03-17)
=
Meeting started by mhroncok at 14:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-03-17/fesco.2021-03-17-14.00.log.html
.
Meeting
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
> is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
> that system adm
Hello!
I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for
someone to
help in exchange of some of yours.
Silver is cross-shell customizable powerline-like prompt heavily inspired by
Agnoster.
It needs to be updated to 2.0.0.
- [ ] rust-silver update
- [ ] rust-co
Il 17/03/21 11:41, Vít Ondruch ha scritto:
>
> I think the problem is that the groups can be removed from package only
> by the main admin. If the main admin is non-responsive, then the whole
> group is kind of hostage. Every group member should be able to remove
> the group from the package IMHO.
Upstream changed this back in 2017, but the spec file was still
listing BSD. This is likely not an issue for anyone, as the package
produces a self-contained binary executable, so nothing is linking
against it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/187 (x86_64), 4/126 (aarch64)
ID: 813393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813393
ID: 813402 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813402
I
Hey All,
Fedora users in out-of-memory (OOM) situations get benefitted by
enabling systemd-oomd[0] by default. Actions taken by systemd-oomd
operate on a per-cgroup level, aligning well with the life cycle of
systemd units. As this becomes a default feature, we are running a
test week to verify th
Am 17.03.21 um 16:47 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
is, automatically on system or package installati
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 17.03.21 um 16:47 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> > > symbolic links) of configuration files ow
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 34 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime:
Hello,
I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided
by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar.
Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster.
+1
Christoph
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 5/126 (aarch64)
ID: 819367 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819367
ID: 819414 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fe
29 matches
Mail list logo
