Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

2021-02-14 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Hi, While Jekyll and its dependencies make a bit complex setup for the first package to maintain, I am willing to start as a Fedora packager by adopting these packages. I already did some work for the Jekyll 4.2.0 on Ruby 3.0, so the problem is not completely new to me. I also actually use th

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable btrfs transparent zstd compression by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:48 PM Tom Seewald wrote: > > > A few more things: > > > > * btrfs-progs tools don't yet have a way to report compression > > information. While 'df' continues to report correctly about actual > > blocks used and free, both regular 'du' (coreutils) and 'btrfs > > filesy

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210214.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210213.0): ID: 776966 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210214.n.0 changes

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210212.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210214.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 22.51 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 14/02/2021 05:41, Tom Seewald wrote: > > The GPUs also have firmware blobs > Could you provide some links to mailing list posts or bug reports where AMD > developers confirm that their GPU firmware requires 4k pages? I think having > some definitive sources will make this situation more cle

Fedora-Rawhide-20210214.n.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 33/183 (x86_64), 25/124 (aarch64

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210214.n.0 changes

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-34-20210213.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210214.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 22 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 883.05 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

2021-02-14 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2021/02/14 4:29: Hi everybody, With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today. - rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm (kramdown support for GitHub-flavored markdown) - rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay (coderay syntax highlighting support) - rubygem-rouge (jekyll d

Fedora-34-20210214.n.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 34/183 (x86_64), 27/124 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210213.n.0): ID: 777331 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/

Fedora-IoT-34-20210214.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210208.0): ID: 777654 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/777654 ID: 7776

Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

2021-02-14 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 14.2.2021 klo 10.25: Hi, While Jekyll and its dependencies make a bit complex setup for the first package to maintain, I am willing to start as a Fedora packager by adopting these packages. I already did some work for the Jekyll 4.2.0 on Ruby 3.0, so the problem is n

Fedora-IoT-33-20210214.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210128.0): ID: 777696 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/777696 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests complet

Re: ELN SIG Launch

2021-02-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 17:01, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > In written English the word 'or' is not exclusive and 'yes' is a synonym > > for 'TRUE'. Basically the question is Stephen trying a CS pun with that > > of > > > > Is thi

Re: So long for now...

2021-02-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 13:29, Martin Jackson wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've had some changes recently at my day job, and while I was hoping I > would have more time to take care of my Fedora (and EPEL) packages, that > seems to not be in the immediate future for me. I'm sorry to those who > dep

Re: koji save-failed-tree enabled

2021-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:17:01PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > is there specific reason, why scratch builds cannot do it? I met hard to > reproduce issues in builds several times. I would prefer to analyse > scratch builds instead of production builds. > > Could for example just sin

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

2021-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:24:12PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: Hey Ian... would it be possible for you to adjust your mail client to send text and html instead of just html? Many on this list expect the text part of emails to be readable. Thanks. ;) As for the perf error, there was a thread on it o

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

2021-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 12:15:14AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > The first key that gets imported to RPM is included in the installation > image and gets installed along with the rest of the system, but that's > not the very first key. The very first OpenPGP key is the one you need > to verify t

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
So, I am a bit leary of this change for the same reason that I was for the last few changes like this. Namely, we are building out own layer on top of rpm to make our lives easier, when we probibly should try and just improve rpm to do this for everyone. I realize that rpm is slow to move and this

vim-common+enhanced installed when replacing vim-wrappers

2021-02-14 Thread Chris Murphy
I'm seeing this with updates: Installing dependencies: gpm-libsx86_64 1.20.7-24.fc33 python3-sssdconfig noarch 2.4.1-1.fc33 vim-common

Strategy for staying on Rawhide

2021-02-14 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- I have a VM that I want to always keep on Rawhide. That was F34 until this past week or so and now I want to update it track F35. Can I basically just follow the instructions at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/ and pass it —releasever=rawhide; I did

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Tom Seewald
> A few people mention it in the Raptor forums[2] If there are actually many other page size issues with amdgpu (or other drivers), then from what I can see the raptor/power9 community is unfortunately not reporting these problems upstream which makes it difficult for the developers to be aware

Re: Strategy for staying on Rawhide

2021-02-14 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:41 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I have a VM that I want to always keep on Rawhide. That was F34 until > this past week or so and now I want to update it track F35. Can I > basically just follow the instructions at > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs

Re: Strategy for staying on Rawhide

2021-02-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 2:41 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I have a VM that I want to always keep on Rawhide. That was F34 until > this past week or so and now I want to update it track F35. Can I > basically just follow the instructions at > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable btrfs transparent zstd compression by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:45 PM Jeremy Linton wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2/11/21 11:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Jeremy Linton wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 1/1/21 8:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > >>> Anyway, compress=zstd:1 is a good default. Everyone benefits,

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

2021-02-14 Thread Ian Laurie
Sorry, fixed, I'll send just plain text. Ian On 15/02/2021 5:18 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:24:12PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: Hey Ian... would it be possible for you to adjust your mail client to send text and html instead of just html? Many on this list expect the text pa

Re: Strategy for staying on Rawhide

2021-02-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 2:41 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I have a VM that I want to always keep on Rawhide. That was F34 until > this past week or so and now I want to update it track F35. Can I > basically just follow the instructions at > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 02. 21 19:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, I am a bit leary of this change for the same reason that I was for the last few changes like this. Namely, we are building out own layer on top of rpm to make our lives easier, when we probibly should try and just improve rpm to do this for everyone. I

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:39:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > That still means a particular change needs to "bump" the release number to a > specific value and hence it generates conflicts/mismatch when: > > - two or more PRs are opened at the same time > - individual commits are cherry-pic

Fedora-IoT-34-20210214.2 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210214.0): ID: 777820 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/777820 ID: 7778

Fedora-IoT-35-20210214.1 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 777846 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/777846 ID: 777848 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: htt

Re: Please clarify master vs main vs rawhide branches

2021-02-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 18:05 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I think this is all you need: > > git fetch -p > > git checkout rawhide > > Then optionally: > > git branch -d master Thank you ! -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210215.0 compose check report

2021-02-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210214.0): ID: 777936 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op