New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

Hey all, I discovered today that there's a new replacement for memtest86+ that appears to even have UEFI support called PCMemTest[0]. The main reason I call out to this is because we don't have a memory tester offering in our UEFI boot variant for the Fedora live media, and this is actively maint

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210207.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210206.0): ID: 771174 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210207.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210206.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210207.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 130 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.86 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On 2/7/21 10:07 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Hey all, I discovered today that there's a new replacement for memtest86+ that appears to even have UEFI support called PCMemTest[0]. It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, since it is dropping features: «In particular, no attempt is made to me

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On Sunday, February 7, 2021, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 2/7/21 10:07 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I discovered today that there's a new replacement for memtest86+ that >> appears to even have UEFI support called PCMemTest[0]. >> > > It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, s

Fedora-Rawhide-20210207.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/183 (x86_64), 12/124 (aarch64

Re: Fedora CoreOS Virtual Meetup this week

On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > Recordings are available on Fedora's youtube channel > > Growing Fedora CoreOS Community : > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuBWeosAvQ > Fedora CoreOS as an Official Edition : > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5VAw8NRXNc > > You

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On 2/7/21 12:16 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sunday, February 7, 2021, Roberto Ragusa mailto:m...@robertoragusa.it>> wrote: It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, since it is dropping features: «In particular, no attempt is made to measure the cache and main memory speed, or

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 09:41, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 2/7/21 12:16 PM, drago01 wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021, Roberto Ragusa > wrote: > > > > It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, since it is > dropping features: > > > > «In partic

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

«In particular, no attempt is made to measure the cache and main memory speed, or to identify and report the DRAM type.»  Which is nice to have but not really the point of a memory tester ... When the tester reports errors then it is handy to know as much as possible about where the

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:03:38AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 09:41, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > > On 2/7/21 12:16 PM, drago01 wrote: > > > It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, since it is > > dropping features: > > > > > > «In particular, no att

Re: Xen support dead?

Another Xen-related bug that has continued through a number of releases has to do with the interaction between Xen and SELinux. The SELinux policy prevents xenstored from functioning. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720309. I am glad to see movement on BZ #1858364, and I am happy

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

These errors are solved in IceCat with following patch: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icecat/blob/902a94597e0d48bbe3e1ebc3184787f7b6fe9242/f/icecat-78.7.1-fix_error_template_with_C_linkage.patch On 2/6/21 11:04 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: Also this build seems to be related to this problem

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-02-08 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have anything urgent this week. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter:

Re: Review swap: voikko-fi (for Finnish spell-checking)

Hi all, This work is finally done and the packages are in Rawhide, in good time before the beta. Thank you Miro and Zbyszek! I think I found a fedpkg import bug while importing voikko-fi from SRPM, I'll make a new thread about that. -Ville-Pekka ___ dev

Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

Hi folks,   I've opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574 [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574] to facilitate assumption ownership of the Sugar packages in Fedora, most of which are de-facto abandoned by the previous maintainer, erikos, who has not authenticated with his FAS account since March

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

- Original Message - > From: "Todd Zullinger" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 5:40:06 PM > Subject: Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow > > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Flo

Re: Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

Hi Alex, I agree that in these cases an immediate orphaning of the packages is justified, as the packager in question is clearly no longer active. You might want to ask a provenpackager to push your fix directly to dist got though, to get the changes in place in time. Cheers, Dan On Februar

fedpkg import weirdness

Hi, I imported a new package called voikko-fi yesterday. I think I hit a bug in fedpkg, but I'm not sure. The packaging guidelines say "Any detached signature file (e.g. foo.tar.gz.asc or foo.tar.gz.sig) must be uploaded to the package lookaside cache alongside the source code, while the keyring m

Re: fedpkg import weirdness

I read a bit of code and thus replying to my own message. It seems rpkg decides whether to upload a file to the lookaside cache or not based on running "file -b --mime-encoding" on it. For a keyring file that returns "binary". See https://pagure.io/rpkg/blob/master/f/pyrpkg/utils.py#_280 -Ville-P

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:08 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > I discovered today that there's a new replacement for memtest86+ that > appears to even have UEFI support called PCMemTest[0]. > > The main reason I call out to this is because we don't have a memory > tester offering in our UEFI bo

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:35:27PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > The issue being that if one of the step fails in one of your clones, the > entire > loop will stop and won't run another time :/ I wrote a little tool called `lsfrom` for restarting such scripting. :-) https://hackage.haskell.org/p

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

I added a `master-rename` command to fbrnch too. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210208.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210207.0): ID: 771721 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op