Adam Williamson writes:
> On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:07 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> clime writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
>> > > Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 1. How does this affect users who download, mayb
clime writes:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 20:07, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> clime writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
>> >> Ben Cotton wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 1. How does this affect users who download, maybe modify, and re
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 747650 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747650
ID: 747657 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
> > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one.
On 28.12.2020 11:54, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Also, I'm against add workarounds on desktop files like this one [1]
forcing apps running with QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb , because is just hidden
the real problem.
Instead of patching, Qt5 maintainers should drop this patch[1].
[1]:
https://src.fedoraproject
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 at 17:52, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 07:44:57PM +0100, clime wrote:
> > I think we can simply parse server-side access logs to count package
> > downloads, no?
>
> We can for our primary server, but most people get updates from mirrors
>
which we don't run
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:32 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> I have not really looked into the source code, so forgive me if that is
> obvious, but why is the snebu executable setuid?
This is for
1) Privilege separation -- application owns the files in the target
repository (/var/lib/snebu); you will ty
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
>> >
>> > == Summary ==
>> > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
>> > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop ses
> Okay, and? There's five months between now and beta freeze. Do you
> seriously think that the bugs there won't get fixed? Some of them
> already *have* been fixed in Plasma 5.19.
It looks like most of the issues listed [1] still have open bug reports. Are
these bug reports just not getting clos
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34 Server
> edition. And more broadly rolled out for Fedora 35.
>
> If it's broadly ready for Fedora 34, great. Otherwise, it seems like a
> good fit for Fedora Server edition
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 71
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 66
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all,
I've read a crap ton of pages now about package creation/maintenance but feel
like I'm missing stuff and spinning wheels so I wanted to ask. The process
seems pretty muddled :-D
I've got an RPM package I maintain called "pick" (I'm already working with the
upstream project and have the
I really don't see we have much of a choice here. X11 is eventually going away
and Wayland is the path forward. That's already been decided, so at this point
it isn't a matter for debate. Human nature being what it is, people tend to
procrastinate and not do anything until pressed up against
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 21:12, FreedomBen via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've read a crap ton of pages now about package creation/maintenance but
> feel like I'm missing stuff and spinning wheels so I wanted to ask. The
> process seems pretty muddled :-D
>
> I've g
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Note that s
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:51 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
... snip ...
So if you haven't tried wayland and plasma lately - you should try again.
>
OK.
a) is there an easy (i.e. documented) way of testing it?
b) is there an equivalent to 'remoting' single windows (applications)
to remote machines
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64)
ID: 748023 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748023
ID: 748032 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL:
Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have
to remove them and re-install them (after downgrading n
...snip...
> >
> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout,
> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template
>
> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround nevertheless. Since
> I am not frequently rebuilding Fedora rpms outside of mock, koji & copr,
> I cannot tell how much
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/180 (x86_64), 5/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
Fulko Hew wrote:
> a) is there an easy (i.e. documented) way of testing it?
Keeping in mind that testing anything now (before plasma 5.21 is
preliminary), but... best way to test:
1. create a new user for testing purposes
2. make sure plasma-workspace-wayland pkg is installed
3. login using
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > > will stop working. Worse they will app
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching
> (February 2021).
>
> Policy:
> https://docs.fedoraproject
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:44 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Flint 2.7.0 is out and has bumped the soname. In about a week, I will
> build it and rebuild all dependent packages, namely:
Except I won't, because some API changes broke a few Fedora packages.
I'll work with the respective upstreams to addre
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > >
> >
> > Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34 Server
> > edition. And more broadly rolled out for Fedora 35.
> >
> > If it's broadly ready for Fedora 34,
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 16:22 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34
> > > Server
> > > edition. And more broadl
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:30 PM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 16:22 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another variation on this th
> I was trying it with Bose QC35 headphones.
>
>
> It was 0.3.18 and as I say it was showing up as a device but
> with no node that I could route audio to.
>
Maybe an extra step is required for that Bose QC35. Try to forget that device
and reconnect.
> That configuration you attached still se
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 15:36 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
> > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 748053 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748053
ID: 748060 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
30 matches
Mail list logo
