Fedora-Cloud-32-20201224.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 745915 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/745915 ID: 745922 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba

Re: Stale proven packagers

> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it. > > Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*)) > should be required to use a hardware token such > as a FIDO2 authenticators with biometrics and/or > PIN required (

Re: Stale proven packagers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:43 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > > > > > It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it. > > > > Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*)) > > should be required to use a hardware token such

Re: bundled libraries

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:45 AM Didier Fabert wrote: > Hi, > > Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the package is > present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this: > > Is it possible to mix bundled/system libs ? like using system libs (the > must part in

Re: bundled libraries

Hi, Thank you very much Richard. Best Regards, Didier FABERT. Le 24/12/2020 à 14:17, Richard Shaw a écrit : On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:45 AM Didier Fabert > wrote: Hi, Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the package is pre

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201224.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201221.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201224.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 66 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 247 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.67 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: bundled libraries

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 8:18 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:45 AM Didier Fabert wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the package is >> present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this: >> >> Is it possible to mix

Re: bundled libraries

Bundled libraries are permitted as long as they do not conflict with system libraries. In your case, it does not happen in Fedora but in EPEL it does; so i would advice you to use a private lib directory in EPEL where bundled .so libraries (generally unversioned libraries) will be installed. Se

Re: Stale proven packagers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:35:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:43 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > > > > > > > > > It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it. > > > > > > Arguably those with elevat

Re: bundled libraries

Hi, It's for netdata package and specifically for the cloud registration feature. So netdata is working fine without this feature but a lot of users claim this feature. All bundled libs are static, so there is no additional .so file installed (neither fedora nor epel repos). We're talking

Re: bundled libraries

On 24/12/20 15:24, Didier Fabert wrote: Hi, It's for netdata package and specifically for the cloud registration feature. So netdata is working fine without this feature but a lot of users claim this feature. All bundled libs are static, so there is no additional .so file installed (neither

Fedora-IoT-34-20201224.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) ID: 746286 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/746286 ID: 746295 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL:

Fedora-Rawhide-20201224.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 8/180 (x86_64), 9/122 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fe

Re: gpg-agents all over the place

On 12/23/20 1:56 PM, Oron Peled wrote: More problematic, but possible. The key is using "--pinentry-mode=loopback" (I don't have my scripts in front of me for further details) There are simple use cases that are very problematic. Consider this: [me@localhost tmp]$ date >date.txt [me@localhos

i-nex: MDecode_dimms._inits.47: #45: File or directory does not exist

Hi, when launch i-nex-7.6.1 [1] i get this warning [martin@fc33 $ env QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb /usr/bin/i-nex.gambas [12/24/2020 16:26:37.889] [INFO] [MStart.Main.23] Starting log [12/24/2020 16:26:37.901] [INFO] [MStart.Main.24] Checking if eeprom module is loaded MDecode_dimms._inits.47: #45: File

Re: gcc11/kconfig_compiler (was: weird build failure on i686)

Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/19/20 9:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> >>> While trying to build a new kde-partitionmanager release, I get a >>> strange build failure which seems related to character encoding: >>> >>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8985/

Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 19:23 -0500, James Cassell wrote: > # Resolve packaging request into a list of packages and operations > > # Download and '''decompress''' packages into a '''locally > > optimized''' rpm file > > Please verify the signature on the downloaded RPM before > decompressing it. (D

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable systemd-oomd by default for all variants(System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Each gnome-terminal tab runs in its own cgroup: > > │ │ │ ├─app-org.gnome.Terminal.slice > │ │ │ │ > ├─vte-spawn-1d1d5519-71d2-4035-929a-8a9ae5bc3822.scope > │ │ │ │ │ ├─7848 bash > │ │ │ │ │ └─7889 less /etc/hosts > │ │ │ │ > ├─vte-

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201225.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 746419 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/746419 ID: 746426 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba