No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201214.0):
ID: 740567 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 14. 12. 20 v 11:22 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
>
> When I started working on rpm back in 2007, landing new features to rpm meant
> looking 5+ years in the horizon to have
> said feature running on a released RHEL running in the builder so people
> could start trying it out on rawhide, which
>
On 12/15/20 11:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 14. 12. 20 v 11:22 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
When I started working on rpm back in 2007, landing new features to rpm meant
looking 5+ years in the horizon to have
said feature running on a released RHEL running in the builder so people could
st
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:08:59PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>
> Feel free to convince maintainers:
>
> https://pagure.io/rpmdevtools/issue/63
>
> kevin
It's easier to provide my own rpmdevtools than convince the 'closed minded'
maintainer.
_
On 12/15/20 12:25 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 12/15/20 11:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 14. 12. 20 v 11:22 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
When I started working on rpm back in 2007, landing new features to
rpm meant looking 5+ years in the horizon to have
said feature running on a released R
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201204.0):
ID: 740601 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/740601
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201215.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201214.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201215.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 882.31 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/180 (x86_64), 16/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same t
Dne 09. 12. 20 v 0:34 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
That said, will "dnf downgrade" offer you cached versions that are no longer
in the repos? Last I checked, it only offered me whatever was still in the
repos, and I had to dig up the cached RPMs manually.
Yes, right, that is why there w
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:35:12PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> But also, we're not using unsquashfs for boot or installation. The
> squashfs image is loop mounted and treated as a random access file
> system. Decompression of blocks is on demand.
Well, maybe we should? It makes a pretty fast test
I have setup filter ages ago and it moves such emails into subfolder. I
still think this is preferable to moving them into different ML.
Vít
Dne 05. 12. 20 v 19:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:43:04PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
I filed https://pagure.io/fesco
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:35:12PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Squashfs doesn't have error detection for its metadata or the data
> contained in it. I'm not sure why you're having such a high success
> rate. Whether lossy or lossless compression algorithms in images, my
> experience it is only som
Hi,
I sorry to tell you, that gpg-agents are inflating on numbers in Fedora
systems:
As far as I understand ssh-agents, you start ONE for each user, but
here, one for each repo is opened by PackageKit:
(today)
root 2530 0.0 0.0 151908 892 ? Ss 14:32 0:00
gpg-agent --h
Just a quick heads-up, there is a new set of Bodhi updates with Mock 2.8 for
rather important isolation regression, no matter configuration - mock 2.7 always
used --isolation=simple. Otherwise it is small release. Please upgrade.
Release notes:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wik
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:36 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:35:12PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > But also, we're not using unsquashfs for boot or installation. The
> > squashfs image is loop mounted and treated as a random access file
> > system. Decompression of blocks
Vít Ondruch writes:
> I have setup filter ages ago and it moves such emails into subfolder. I
> still think this is preferable to moving them into different ML.
I would like to disagree with the idea that everyone needing to create
their own filtration is preferable to putting them on a separat
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:18 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch writes:
>
> > I have setup filter ages ago and it moves such emails into subfolder. I
> > still think this is preferable to moving them into different ML.
>
> I would like to disagree with the idea that everyone needing to cre
Hi,
> In particular I'm worried alsa programs will stop working.
There is a pipewire-alsa package to support alsa programs
> Shouldn't the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio also be compatible with pipewire's
> pulseaudio implementation?
It is but then you go through an extra layer of emulation, it's bett
Mauricio Tavares writes:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:18 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>>
>> Vít Ondruch writes:
>>
>> > I have setup filter ages ago and it moves such emails into subfolder. I
>> > still think this is preferable to moving them into different ML.
>>
>> I would like to disagree with t
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 13:07 -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Mauricio Tavares writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:18 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > >
> > > Vít Ondruch writes:
> > >
> > > > I have setup filter ages ago and it moves such emails into subfolder. I
> > > > still think this is pr
> Gary Buhrmaster wrote on Mon, Dec 14, 2020:
>
> With updates-testing enabled here, it's much better than last month (no
> more gdm being removed), but there still are a few pulseaudio direct
> dependencies:
Steam from rpmfusion still conflicts with pipewire-pulseaudio as well. Until
that confl
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm a bit torn by this. The rawhide report has actually triggered
> conversation (less than 3 weeks ago) and I find it usefull to point out
> things.
I also find the rawhide reports (at least occasionally)
useful, as being the early canaries fo
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:03:03PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Right. The two I've previously suggested: btrfs seed and dm-verity.
> Every read is verified, the user can't opt out, and they are more
> performant than checkisomd5. Upon detecting error, both emit EIO which
> is handled at the applic
If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
For now, downgrade nss or avoid updating to it until things can get
sorted out.
https://bugzil
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 7:17:21 PM WET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
>
> For now, downgrade nss
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
I'm running firefox 83.0-13.fc33.x86_
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:04:24 PM WET Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> I'm running firefox 83.0-13.fc33.x86_64 with nss 3.59.0-2.fc33
> installed since it hit my local updates-testing mirror and all my
> add-ons are looking good. Could there be something else that's causing
> trouble? I have
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F34MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.16
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.16 in Fedora 34,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version will
not be available at the time of the ma
Wim Taymans wrote on Tue, Dec 15, 2020:
> > In particular I'm worried alsa programs will stop working.
>
> There is a pipewire-alsa package to support alsa programs
Aha! I had missed it, thanks.
> > Shouldn't the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio also be compatible with pipewire's
> > pulseaudio implement
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> > remove them and re-ins
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 22:38 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > > will stop working. W
Dne 15. 12. 20 v 11:39 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
> BTW, I'm not aware of the details how the images are built these days, but of
> course *something* will still need to
> build those images,
That is normal podman image of Fedora.
Strictly speaking you will still need to have compatibility with
I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
yours.
What you - as Fedora packager - find most time consuming on packaging?
Where you will welcome more simplicity or automation?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:19:16PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F34MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
>
> == Summary ==
> Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
> stable releases.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
> * Em
On 12/15/20 4:29 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
What you - as Fedora packager - find most time consuming on packaging?
Where you will welcome more simplicity or automation?
Pushing updates requires too many steps, IMHO.
1.
2. fedpkg mockbuild
3.
4. fedpkg commit -p
5. fedpkg build
6. fedpkg updat
On 12/15/20 11:29 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
yours.
Thanks for doing this!
What you - as Fedora packager - find most time consuming on packaging?
Coordination and communi
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 5:29 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
> enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
> yours.
>
> What you - as Fedora packager - find most time consuming on packaging?
> Where you will welcome more simpli
On 12/15/20 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 22:38 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
w
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:44:49PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Can we make the Bodhi update notes part of the git repo? Ex. ChangeLog.md
I would definitely like to see a consolidated changelog. I don't know if it
should be part of the git repo, or just a changelog convention. (Like:
any li
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:29 pm, Matthew Miller
wrote:
I would definitely like to see a consolidated changelog. I don't know
if it
should be part of the git repo, or just a changelog convention. (Like:
any lines starting with > get put into the notes for the next bodhi
update?)
+1 to consoli
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 17:59 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 12/15/20 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 22:38 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 18:29 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:44:49PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Can we make the Bodhi update notes part of the git repo? Ex. ChangeLog.md
>
> I would definitely like to see a consolidated changelog. I don't know if it
> should be
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:45 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 17:59 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On 12/15/20 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 22:38 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
>
Off topic, is there a way to see the message headers in Hyperkitty?
I'm trying to figure out why 4 messages in this thread were never
delivered to me.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Off topic, is there a way to see the message headers in Hyperkitty?
> I'm trying to figure out why 4 messages in this thread were never
> delivered to me.
You're a gmail user like me. Between approximately 90 and 30 minutes
ago, I had
Hi Jerry,
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM Alexander Ploumistos
>
> You're a gmail user like me. Between approximately 90 and 30 minutes
> ago, I had several people call me to ask why I had deleted my email
> account. Email sent to me was bouncing back with a message that the
> account did no
Marius Schwarz writes:
Hi,
I sorry to tell you, that gpg-agents are inflating on numbers in Fedora
systems:
I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message on
standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
typed in.
But that was too s
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.62 together with fedpkg-1.40 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, Fedora 33 and Fedora 32 are present in stable repositories.
epel7, epel8 are in the testing repositories, feel free to try these
waiting distributions in Bodhi. Version for epel
Sorry to be a bother, but is there another side effect from having
this update installed on a server? As far as I could tell from the
discussion on the update page, only the sha1 signed firefox add-ons
are concerned, but I could be missing something.
___
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message
> on standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
> typed in.
>
> But that was too simple, primitive, and bulletproof. I guess that things
> can't be as simple any more, an
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 02:40 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Sorry to be a bother, but is there another side effect from having
> this update installed on a server? As far as I could tell from the
> discussion on the update page, only the sha1 signed firefox add-ons
> are concerned, but I could
Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message
> on standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
> typed in.
>
> But that was too simple, primitive, and bulletproof. I guess that things
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201215.0):
ID: 741415 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
55 matches
Mail list logo
