Re: Should the default editor be changed from vi to nano on upgrades to Fedora 33+

> actually Vim ships vim-default-editor subpackage now, which conflicts I did install it, but that didn't seem to have an immediate effect. > with nano-default-editor via virtual provide 'system-default-editor'. It I don't have that package on my system: $ sudo dnf remove nano-default-editor No

Re: Should the default editor be changed from vi to nano on upgrades to Fedora 33+

On 12/3/20 10:52 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: puts setting EDITOR environment variable into a file (vim-default-editor.sh for bash, ksh, sh and zsh, vim-default-editor.csh for tcsh and vim-default-editor.fish for fish), which is installed under a specific directory (/etc/profile.d for bash, tcsh,

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201204.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201203.0): ID: 735348 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Should the default editor be changed from vi to nano on upgrades to Fedora 33+

> > Maybe I need to reboot my system for vim to take over again? > > You will at least need to logout and log back in. You're right, if I force a login instead of plain sudo it becomes apparent: $ sudo env | grep EDITOR $ sudo su -c env | grep EDITOR $ sudo su - -c env | grep EDITOR EDITOR=/usr/b

<    1   2