Fedora-Cloud-33-20201028.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201027.0): ID: 708386 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-28)

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell wrote: > > > > > > > > > PROPOSAL: Cancel the 28-Oct-2020 FESCo meeting because we have no > > > issues tagged with 'meeting

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-28)

Works for me On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 09:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > PROP

[ELN] Achieved milestone - first installable ELN compose

Hi, all, this is yet another informational message from the ELN SIG, no action required. On Monday we achieved a major milestone for the ELN project: we got the first installable ELN compose artifact. As many of you know, ELN is the alternative buildroot for Fedora, where we rebuild Fedora Rawhi

Re: PythonMacroError change tripping up fedora-review on Python packages?

On 10/28/20 12:55 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 16:41 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: When reviewing python-TestSlide (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891963#), fedora-review failed with: error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python to /

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-28)

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:52 AM David Cantrell wrote: > > > PROPOSAL: Cancel the 28-Oct-2020 FESCo meeting because we have no > issues tagged with 'meeting' and no pending issues to discuss in an > open forum. I will chair the 04-Nov-2020 meeting. Ack, sounds good to me. Fabio _

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201028.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

First thank you Neil and Petr for your feedback on this. I really appreciate it. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > At the end of the day for Fedora, packagers are maintaining the modules, > so they should be able to mark a module as EOL when they feel like they > don't want i

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201028.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201027.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201028.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:67 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 150 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.92 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: EOL and Obsoletes in Modularity

On 10/28/20 12:13 PM, Martin Curlej wrote: First thank you Neil and Petr for your feedback on this. I really appreciate it. Thanks to you Martin as well for trying to be open about future modularity development.  On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:02 PM Neal Gompa > wrote:

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 23/10/20 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna wrote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > development_ work in Fedora ca

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Jonathan Wakely: > Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain > ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it > would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I lose several > weeks of GCC's stage 1 development. No thanks. This is for C++20 l

Fedora-Rawhide-20201028.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 35/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in > September. As promised, this is the first of a 5-part series breaking > down main topics that came up during the session. I will send a topic >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I lose several weeks of GCC's stage 1 de

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

* Jonathan Wakely: > On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >>* Jonathan Wakely: >> >>> Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain >>> ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it >>> would be landing on real users' machines. Which means I los

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > - Question: could gitlab (inc) maintain a Community Edition GitLab > > instance that Fedora uses? [...] > So, if I understand this correctly it means we have the choice between: > - self-hosting a gitlab instance > - have a ded

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2020-10-28) [MEETING CANCELLED]

= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-10-28) = Meeting started by dcantrell at 13:49:03 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-10-28/fesco.2020-10-28-13.49.log.html . Meetin

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:57 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in > > September. As promised, this is the first of a 5-part series breaking > >

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:56:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:57 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in > >

Re: GitLab AMA Topic Discussion: Permissions & Access

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:56:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:57 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:17:04PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/28/20 7:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Jonathan Wakely: >> >>> Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain >>> ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it >>> would be landing on real users' m

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 28/10/20 14:35 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: On 28/10/20 13:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jonathan Wakely: Dropping GCC 11 into rawhide now would mean I can't make certain ABI-breaking changes to the C++20 library in upstream GCC, because it would be landing on real

FESCo election nominations are now open

Beginning today through 11 Nov, you may nominate candidates for the 5 open seats on the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo). To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations FESCo is currently

Fedora-IoT-33-20201028.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201020.0): ID: 708917 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/708917 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Test

Re: Announcing rpminspect-1.2

Il 27/10/20 18:49, David Cantrell ha scritto: > Announcing rpminspect-1.2 > Thanks for your work, I find rpminspect a really useful tool! Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-10-29 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-10-29 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2020-10-29 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-10-29 1

Re: Fedora Cloud rawhide images not updating?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Lubomír Sedlář wrote: > > It's very much not obvious. I believe the root cause is that there are > two raw.xz images for Server on armhfp, which are indistinguishable in > the metadata. This causes loading of the metadata to fail. The script > that partial

Re: Orphaned packages (including pdc-client) looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:11:05PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10/26/20 5:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 10/25/20 7:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:55:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > ...sn

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201028.n.0 changes

: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201027.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201028.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:67 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 6 > Dropped packages:0 > Upgraded packages: 150 > Downgraded packages: 0 > > Size of add

October Fedora CoreOS update for the Fedora Council

The Fedora CoreOS working group periodically gives status updates to the Fedora Council. Since we compiled this list I figured it would be nice to share more widely: - Shipped Fedora CoreOS based on Fedora 33 in the `next` stream - [migrated existing systems to systemd-resolved](https://githu

Problem with F32 koji build root?

I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets (F31, F33, rawhide are all good). The error is in the tex packages: ERROR: Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/2028/54442028/local/work/tasks/1779/54441779/kicad-5.1.8-1.fc32.src.rpm) Config(f32-build-23694835-2326598) 0 mi

Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

Hello! I've been involved in the Fedora and CentOS communities for a few years now as part of the Operating Systems team at Facebook, and most recently helped drive the btrfs by default change proposal for Fedora 33. Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook to try and g

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:08 PM Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > > Hello! > > I've been involved in the Fedora and CentOS communities for a few years > now as part of the Operating Systems team at Facebook, and most > recently helped drive the btrfs by default change proposal for Fedora > 33. > >

Re: Fedora Cloud rawhide images not updating?

On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 12:38 +0100, Lubomír Sedlář wrote: > > It's very much not obvious. I believe the root cause is that there are > two raw.xz images for Server on armhfp, which are indistinguishable in > the metadata. This causes loading of the metadata to fail. The script > that partial copy s

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Cavalca

Hi Davide! Welcome on board the packagers group! On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: [snip] > Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook > to > try and get more of our OSS software packaged in Fedora. There's a > lot > of software on github