Re: Unresponsive packagers: wolnei and dturecek

2020-10-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:53:58PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, October 9, 2020 4:59:32 PM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > - dturecek has no corresponding bugzilla account - First notification Oct > > 1st > > Dominik left Red Hat ~10 days ago, so he probably lost the access to his

R-ps license change: BSD -> MIT

2020-10-10 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
The R-ps 1.4.0 package has changed license from the previous BSD to MIT. New builds will be made shortly. -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: fawkes

2020-10-10 Thread Till Hofmann
On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package? >> Or something in gazebo? > > I think it's the other way around: ignition-msgs needs protobuf 3.13 > because that contains a patch that

Re: fawkes

2020-10-10 Thread Till Hofmann
On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> >> On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> >>> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package? >>> Or something in gazebo? >> >> I think it's the other way around: ignition-ms

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201007.0): ID: 690057 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201010.n.0 changes

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 91 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 399.75 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: mod2c

2020-10-10 Thread Andy Mender
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Another really simple single binary package for NeuroFedora is ready for > review: > mod2c: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886957 > > This is required to build the optimised CoreNeuron component of the > NEURON simulator.

our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-10 Thread clime
Hello, could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc? I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but if vi starts instead I am happy too. I know that the solution is to create a customized container but often I want to try som

Fedora-Rawhide-20201010.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 23/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora-IoT-32-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200925.0): ID: 690390 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-10 Thread Joe Doss
On 10/10/20 7:37 AM, clime wrote: Didn't want to write about this first but maybe there are more people with the same problem. You are not alone. I had to set the same alias for Fedora CoreOS because I kept typing vim out of habit and FCOS ships vim-minimal. It was driving me nuts. Maybe th

Re: fawkes

2020-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > > On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > >> > >> On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >>> > >>> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs pack

Re: need to untag/delete two builds from f34

2020-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:45:53AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote: > Hi, > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection > > I need to untag/delete fabtests-1.11.1rc1-1.fc34 and > libfabric-1.11.1rc1-1.fc34, which was built by me. I tried to untag > them, but I don't have the permission. > >

RPM review: jack-mixer

2020-10-10 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi all, I've brought-over another package from Ubuntu, this time it's Jack Mixer. This is an excellent program that provides a simple mixer that works with MIDI and allows for plugins to be patched-in using Carla. This is a great alternative to having a full-fledged DAW running while trying to do

Re: fawkes

2020-10-10 Thread Till Hofmann
On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs p

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 14:37 +0200, clime wrote: > Hello, > > could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with > `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc? > > I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but > if vi starts instead I am happy too. I know that the solution i

sip 5?

2020-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Does anyone know if there are plans to move fedora to sip 5? We currently have 4.19, but all the new calibre versions require 5 and sip 5 has been out for about a year now. ;( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825507 had some discussion, but nothing recently. ;( I think it would make

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201010.n.0 changes

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20201009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: fawkes

2020-10-10 Thread Rich Mattes
On 10/10/20 5:27 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think this mig

Fedora-33-20201010.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201009.n.0): ID: 690472 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690472 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20201009.n.0):

Fedora-IoT-33-20201011.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201008.0): ID: 690590 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te