No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200921.0):
ID: 674881 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.01 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
The latest eln build of systemtap fails to install, which prevents qemu
from being built:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1881342
The maintainer of systemtap says that it is the eln rebuild what went wrong.
So he created a new rawhide build in the hope that it will trigger a new eln
build, whi
There is no agenda.
I'll chair the next meeting.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
h
Hi, Kamil,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:41 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> The latest eln build of systemtap fails to install, which prevents qemu
> from being built:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1881342
>
> The maintainer of systemtap says that it is the eln rebuild what went wrong.
> So he creat
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):
ID: 674908 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
Hi there
I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
successfully so that I can push a coordinated update.
Now, when I try to submit that update, bodhi cli gives an unqualified auth
error, and bodhi web tells me I need commit access for 2 of the 5 packages (I
hav
You can manually set the CPU affinity (see taskset utility) to decide the
core(s) where to run your process, even if it is already running.
From: stan via devel
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 9:06 PM
To: ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Development discussio
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the interest!
I have created a wiki page, could you please add yourselves in the
"Participants" section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KubeDev? -
This would make it easier for me to set a meeting time that fits with
everyone's timezone.
There is also this IRC ch
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
> successfully so that I can push a coordinated update.
>
> Now, when I try to submit that update, bodhi cli gives an unqualified auth
> er
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200603.0):
ID: 675515 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
> > successfully so that I can push a coordinated update
test security website https://uma.ac.id/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Lis
OLD: Fedora-33-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.17 MiB
Size of dropped packages:438.00 KiB
I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command for rawhide.
Did you see the following error?
```
No such file or directory:
'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/etc/resolv.conf'
```
```
$ rpm -q mock
mock-2.3-1.fc32.noarch
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ruby-2.5.8-106.f
Il 23/09/20 18:23, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>> I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
>>> success
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:38 pm, Jun Aruga wrote:
I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command
for rawhide.
Did you see the following error?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878924
Looks like F33 and F31 updates are still in -testing, F32 update is
stable.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:38:46PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command for
> rawhide.
> Did you see the following error?
>
> ```
> No such file or directory:
> '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/etc/resolv.conf'
> ```
>
> ```
> $ rp
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 05:02:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 23/09/20 18:23, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >>> Hi there
> >>>
> >>> I h
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):
ID: 675634 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675634
ID: 675645 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso des
Hi everyone,
No cancelations this time! The Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is
scheduled for Thursday 24 September. We will meet at 1700 UTC in
#fedora-meeting-1 to determine if we will release Fedora 33 Beta.
[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9810/
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him /
So, I thought I would provide an update here.
The mainframe admins discovered a large part of our woes: Our lpars were
on "slow" 7200 rpm disk. They migrated us to "fast" local disk a few
weeks ago, and indeed things are MUCH better from what I can see.
The problem is not 100% solved, as I see
Messaggio originale
On 23 Set 2020, 19:17, Kevin Fenzi < ke...@scrye.com> ha scritto:
Anyone can build anything, but constrained by:
* It cannot have been built before. ie, it must be a different N-V-R from
a existing successfull build.
* It has to build against src.fedoraproject.
Awesome! Thanks to everyone involved!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:28 PM
Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
pull request includes a comment linking to said pull request, per the
packaging guidelines
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:42 PM Carl George wrote:
> Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
> been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
> their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
> pull request includes a comme
Hello team,
As part to adhering the Fedora cmake guideline, opensubdiv oddly failed
to build without a proper details. As I am unfamiliar with cmake
debugging, here is the tail result:
- Found TBB: /usr/include (found suitable version "2020.3", minimum required is
"4.0")
-- Found OpenGL: /us
Hello,
I'd like to inform Fedora packagers that I removed the long-overlooked and
useless post-install dependency from perl-interpreter on perl-macros package
(effective since perl-interpreter-5.32.0-463.fc34). I don't forsee any
consequences, but here are the details:
perl-macros delivers RPM ma
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:09:37 PM CEST Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up. There was a CI cluster downtime yesterday and
> the build was impacted by it. I restarted it, and it passed
>
> https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/eln-build-pipeline/17459/
>
> The
30 matches
Mail list logo
