On 11.09.2020 10:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> You get a side tag in Koji where you can have private build-only
> dependencies that are discarded (filtered) once they are no longer
> needed, after module build is done.
IMO, this is a very bad practice. I maintain a lot of C++ header-only
libraries
On 11.09.2020 18:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm not enthusiastic about build-time-only packages, but if the choice
> is between that and retiring the packages (or hiding them in modules
> which has the same effect), I'll take it.
This will be Modularity 2.0. All packages must be inst
On 11.09.2020 22:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Is there a Qt5 rebuild in progress?
Yes. Qt 5.15.1 is going to Rawhide and F33.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:32:51AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 11.09.2020 18:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I'm not enthusiastic about build-time-only packages, but if the choice
> > is between that and retiring the packages (or hiding them in modules
> > which has the s
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200911.0):
ID: 663576 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:32:51AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 11.09.2020 18:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > I'm not enthusiastic about build-time-only packages, but if the choice
> > > is betwee
Hey Andy!
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
>
> If there are no takers, I'd like to maintain the python-blindspinner
> package. I see there is some room to bring in its "click" dependencies.
I've provided you admin access on python-blindspinner. Thank you so much for
taki
Hey Michel,
> I'll take python-lupa
>
> Thanks for your work over the years, and hope you at least remain a
> user,
I've provided you admin access for python-lupa. Thank you so much for taking it
up! :)
I'll definitely remain a user and will try to help out with evangelism. I hope
I'll get en
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Branched 20200912.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-33-20200911.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200912.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200911.n.0):
ID: 663654 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/663654
Soft failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
(Te
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We are in Beta freeze. Only packages that fix accepted blocker bugs or
> freeze break exceptions can go stable.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes
Would it be possible for Bodhi to say so, so people don't need to ask
here on the mailing list?
Kevin's wordi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200909.0):
ID: 663811 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te
On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 10:18 +, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
> Hey Michel,
>
> > I'll take python-lupa
> >
> > Thanks for your work over the years, and hope you at least remain a
> > user,
>
> I've provided you admin access for python-lupa. Thank you so much for
> taking it up! :)
>
Thanks Dhane
On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 15:33 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We are in Beta freeze. Only packages that fix accepted blocker bugs
> > or
> > freeze break exceptions can go stable.
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes
>
> Would it be possible for Bodhi to sa
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:52:14 PM WEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I agree , why not even have a count for starting to freeze ? , I though
> that freeze just start after we have first beta candidate.
It does not work that way. There is a freeze for beta and there is a freeze
for the final rele
On 9/11/20 3:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 15:50 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
Accepted blockers
-
1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — ON_QA
abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core dumps produced
by systemd-246~rc
> how much memory that amounts to in the usual scenarios
700M on F32 without any apps started.
Largest file: (207.9M) /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive
Files list with its sizes: https://pastebin.com/Hpr6D3Sv
Locking even 250M-300M takes good effect. For example, demo:
https://www.youtube.com/wat
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 2:13 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
>
> On 9/11/20 3:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 15:50 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> Accepted blockers
> >> -
> >> 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — ON_QA
> >> abr
On 9/12/20 2:39 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 11.09.2020 22:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Is there a Qt5 rebuild in progress?
Yes. Qt 5.15.1 is going to Rawhide and F33.
It's introduced at least two FTBFS in my packages (plplot, vtk) - are we
sure we want to push to F33 now?
--
Orion
On 9/12/20 5:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 9/12/20 2:39 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 11.09.2020 22:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Is there a Qt5 rebuild in progress?
Yes. Qt 5.15.1 is going to Rawhide and F33.
It's introduced at least two FTBFS in my packages (plplot, vtk) - are we
On 9/12/20 5:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is pending for 3 days, so --advisory doesn't work since it's
still not in u-t.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fd3d0e6879
Instead I did
bodi updates download --updateid=FEDORA-2020-fd3d0e6879
dnf update *rpm
And it skips a bunch
On 9/5/20 5:29 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
"BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_conte
23 matches
Mail list logo
