/etc/localtime is not a symlink on koji?

Hi, I'm debugging an issue in a FTBFS, which appears caused by unexpected warnings during a build [1]. These warnings come from R and complain that /etc/localtime is not a symlink. According to `man 5 localtime` [2], /etc/localtime cannot be a normal file or hard link. Is this something wrong in

Re: /etc/localtime is not a symlink on koji?

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 04:00:14AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > I'm debugging an issue in a FTBFS, which appears caused by unexpected > warnings during a build [1]. These warnings come from R and complain > that /etc/localtime is not a symlink. > > According to `man 5 localtime` [2],

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200908.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200907.0): ID: 658132 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: /etc/localtime is not a symlink on koji?

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 04:52, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 04:00:14AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > I'm debugging an issue in a FTBFS, which appears caused by unexpected > > warnings during a build [1]. These warnings come from R and complain > > that /etc/localtime i

libxls SONAME change

Hi, The latest libxls 1.6.0 changes ABI, but accidentally did not update SONAME. I have not yet updated, but will do so once upstream fixes the SONAME, which I hope will happen within a week's time for this notice's purposes. As far as I am aware, the only package dependencies are R-readxl, which

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200908.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

question about ELN builds of glusterfs and ceph?

I confess I'm a bit ignorant about how the ELN builds are going to be used. Especially the ELN builds of glusterfs and ceph. That aside— Red Hat ships GlusterFS and Ceph (RHGS and RHCS respectively) as products, and generally speaking glusterfs and ceph packages are not included in RHEL; at least

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200908.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200907.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200908.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:175.35 KiB Size of

Fedora-33-20200908.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200907.n.0): ID: 658435 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/658435 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200907.n.0):

Fedora-IoT-33-20200908.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200907.0): ID: 658769 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or

F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma == Summary == Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa]], [[User:Rdieter|Rex Dieter]], [[User:Jgrulich|J

F34 Change proposal: Remove support for SELinux runtime disable (System-Wide Change)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable == Summary == Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can be hardened via read-only-after-initialization protections. Migrate users to using ''selinux=0'' if they want to disable SELinux. =

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Hi Ben, On 9/8/2020 8:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma == Summary == Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > On 9/8/2020 8:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma > > > > == Summary == > > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the > > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Deskt

CPE Quarterly Feedback Survey Results

Hey folks, I want to thank everyone that took the time to complete the survey for us. Even more so for those of you that left comments to help give us extra info and context, this is invaluable. The flip side is, it takes a little time to work through and that's what we're doing right now. A few

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 17:28:20 CEST Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma > > == Summary == > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one. > > == Owner == > * Nam

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Yes, I don't see KDE Wayland sufficiently mature to actually work as a default. It needs more work and testing. On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:33, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 17:28:20 CEST Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultF

Re: F34 Change proposal: Remove support for SELinux runtime disable (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable > > == Summary == > Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can > be hardened via read-only-after-initialization protections. > > Migr

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:57 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote: > > Yes, I don't see KDE Wayland sufficiently mature to actually work as a > default. It needs more work and testing. > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:33, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: >> >> Please no, KWin Wayland makes my system crash as soon as

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:28:20 -0400 Ben Cotton wrote: > Is Wayland ready? > Wayland has been used by default for Fedora Workstation (which uses > GNOME) since Fedora 25. And while it was somewhat immature initially, > today it is a very rock-solid experience on virtually everything > Fedo

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:35:11PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: > Does it now have support for custom keymappings? That is, does it have > a way to set a user keymap as the default? X has a very mature system > for setting this, so I can have my custom keymapping everywhere except > in editing the

Re: noarch packages only for some architecture composes

On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 13:15 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer > wrote: > > Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the > > composes? > > ... > I don't think this is possible, and since I consider this to be a > bug, > I reported this

Re: Looking for new Python package maintainers

Hi Dhanesh, On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 11:13 +0530, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote: > Hello folks! > > I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I > don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which > are > maintained by me and I'd like to hand them over. Following is

The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

Hi everybody, So, after some recent FESCo decisions (no default module streams in fedora, new Module Policy for fedora and ELN modules), it's time to ask this question again: What's the future of the Java Stack in fedora, and by extension, in ELN (and possibly RHEL)? For the past ~18 months, the

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Hi all On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 08:56, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: Hi Ben, On 9/8/2020 8:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: == Summary == Change the default session selectio

Release rpkg-1.61 and fedpkg-1.39

Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.61 together with fedpkg-1.39 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Some bugfixes were released earlier as patches. Currently, Fedora 32, epel7, epel8 and rawhide packages are in the testing repository, feel free to try these waiting distributions in Bodhi

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Has anyone compiled a (non-exhaustive) list of known issues that are specific to KDE Plasma with Wayland? Are there currently any issues that would block Wayland from becoming the default if they aren't resolved in time for F34? ___ devel mailing list