No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200904.0):
ID: 655823 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:39:18 -0400
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 18:03, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I'm seeing this error that causes a test failure on F32 for a noarch
> > python package. It builds in mock on my x86_64 here, but on koji it gets
> > a
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:13:26AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
...
> Based on the results above, I'd suggest selecting the following
> ''optimal configuration'': XZ algorithm, with block size of 1MiB and
> without BCJ filter (plain xz -b 1M, wi
If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
"BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
--
*Those who don't unders
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>
> If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
>
> "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp
Hi all,
I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows NOTABUG,
NEXTRELEASE etc.), my browser freezes. Is anyone else seeing this issue?
I've tried to search for similar bug reports, but searching for
"bugzilla firefo
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
> issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows NOTABUG,
> NEXTRELEASE etc.), my browser freezes. Is anyone else seeing this issue?
Yep, I u
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On 9/5/20 3:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
>> issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows NOTABUG,
>> NEXTRELEASE etc.), m
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200904.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200905.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:124
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 123.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-33-20200904.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200905.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:122
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 119.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:171.41 MiB
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200904.n.0):
ID:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200904.n.0):
ID: 656087 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/656087
ID: 656089 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notificatio
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:14:21PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> That's an interesting choice. Isn't it a bit of a waste to put all of the
> resources into Pagure for so long, only to jump over to GitLab?
This is called the "sunk cost fallacy". There may be plenty of reasons to
keep with Pagu
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
> It's something that's
Matthew Miller wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2020:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&utm_medi
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 8:40:21 AM MST Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:14:21PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > That's an interesting choice. Isn't it a bit of a waste to put all of the
> >
> > resources into Pagure for so long, only to jump over to GitLab?
>
>
>
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:27:11AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> The sunk cost fallacy only applies when there are benefits to moving to a new
> platform. The resources spent on designing and implementing something that
> meets Fedora's needs should definitely be weighed here.
It's still not
Blender 2.90 was released few week ago which a noticeable change, it is
now exclusively available for 64 bits architecture meaning 32 bit arch
support is discontinued by upstream. For that reason, the build will
only apply for Rawhide and Fedora 33.
Maintainers for armv7 architecture are welco
On 05 Sep 2020, at 17:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:14:21PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>> That's an interesting choice. Isn't it a bit of a waste to put all of the
>> resources into Pagure for so long, only to jump over to GitLab?
>
> This is called the "sunk cost
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 6:30 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
>
> "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&u
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 11:22 AM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2020:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgle
22 matches
Mail list logo
