On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:21 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> > On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > > Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can
> > > > > I simply remove them from the spec file?
> >
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:01 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> == Summary ==
> Establish a set of rules for Modular content in Fedora to ensure an
> optimal user and packager experience.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
> before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and
> I unretired it after a review request and a unretirement request
> ticke
On 23. 07. 20 10:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Is this supposed to be voted on by FESCo? The Wiki page was moved into
the "ChangeAnnounced" category but I don't seem to find either a FESCo
ticket, and I don't remember voting on it, or an announcement.
ChangeAnnounced is for the mailing list announ
On 22. 07. 20 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because pagure.io
is down), I am not sure what is the outcome wrt default streams. Default streams
are not allowed now. If this chan
Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
> There is a preview of the new policy available at
> https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
I think this part may be confusing
Packages provided at runtime by the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:29:17AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> > There is a preview of the new policy available at
> > https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
>
Thanks all for your answers, especially Pierre-Yves for having solved
the issue on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9615 ;)
Le jeu. 23 juil. 2020 à 10:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon
a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DXVKwined3d
>
> == Summary ==
> Proposal to replace default wined3d backend with DXVK, A Vulkan-based
> translation layer for Direct3D 9/10/11 which allows running 3D applications
> on Linux using Wine.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:20:45AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
> > before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time)
On Thursday, 23 July 2020 at 13:40, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DXVKwined3d
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Proposal to replace default wined3d backend with DXVK, A
> > Vulkan-based translation layer for Direct3D 9
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 14:49, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am writing today to share a proposal for how we can make it
> easier to enable tests in Fedora CI.
>
> We've heard the user story mentioned in the subject many times.
> Fedora developers have frequently mentioned the difficulti
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:15 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> But I think it should be voted at FESCo after a week? The change process is
> vague here, because it only says "no sooner than a week". Ben?
>
Huh. I have no idea how this slipped through the several places I
should have noticed it, but I wil
On 7/23/20 6:40 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
One question though: why doesn't Wine implement something like
libglvnd for swapping wined3d backends dynamically? It seems like that
would be a sturdier way to do things and handle hardware swaps a lot
more gracefully.
It's just the way these wine-fork pro
On 7/23/20 7:11 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
+1. Is Vulkan supported on AMD Radeon HD 7900 series (TAHITI)? Some
sources I found say it is:
https://vulkan.gpuinfo.org/listreports.php?devicename=AMD%20Radeon%20HD%207900%20Series
but vulkaninfo just gives me an error despite my having
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:18 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Is Vulkan supported on AMD Radeon HD 7900 series (TAHITI)? Some
> sources I found say it is:
>
> https://vulkan.gpuinfo.org/listreports.php?devicename=AMD%20Radeon%20HD%207900%20Series
> but vulkaninf
Hi Dominik,
Thank you for your questions. See my comments inline.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:39, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 14:49, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am writing today to share a proposal for how we can make it
> > easier to enable t
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:30 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> > There is a preview of the new policy available at
> > https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
>
>
> I thi
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:26 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 07. 20 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ...
> >> As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because
> >> pagure.io
> >> is down), I am not sure what is the
On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
with a report for review by FESCo on the progress of using modularity
technology in this manner" in the FESCo ap
On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
with a report for review by FESCo on the progress of using modularity
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
> >> time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:31:20PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > I can't remember the name, but the tool that would let you see dependency
> > differences between releases. I have a package that's failing one of
> it's
> > tests but neith
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >> I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
> > >> time
I have not been able to give mozilla-iot-gateway the attention that it
needs. Also, upstream now has Fedora rpm's[1], and a container, so
having it in Fedora is not as critical as it once was.
Below is the packages I am orphaning:
mozilla-iot-gateway
nodejs-nanomsg
There is nothing that depends
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> (Sending this heads-up in a new thread for better visibility.)
>
> Yesterday the f33-java11 side tag was merged into rawhide, which
> brings the necessary changes to make java-11-openjdk the default Java
> in fedora. All packages dependin
* Adam Williamson [2020-07-23 20:57]:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > (Sending this heads-up in a new thread for better visibility.)
> >
> > Yesterday the f33-java11 side tag was merged into rawhide, which
> > brings the necessary changes to make java-11-openjdk th
On July 23, 2020 6:17:04 p.m. PDT, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>* Adam Williamson [2020-07-23 20:57]:
>> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> > (Sending this heads-up in a new thread for better visibility.)
>> >
>> > Yesterday the f33-java11 side tag was merged into rawhide, whic
Hello team,
It looks like something broke inside cmake when attempting to detect python:
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:164
(message):
Could NOT find PythonLibsUnix (missing: PYTHON_LIBRARY PYTHON_LIBPATH
PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIR PYTHON_INCLUDE_CONFIG_
Le 20/07/2020 à 21:34, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit :
> This doesn't help to fix this:
>
> %build
> mkdir -p build
> cd build
> %cmake3 \
> ..
> %make_build
>
> Help?
Have you try "%cmake3 -S .. -B ."
This should override the default "-S ."
As the previous version require the so
30 matches
Mail list logo
