On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> mozc:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base
> ‘mozc::user_dictionary::UserDictionaryStorage’ in derived type
> ‘mozc::UserDictionaryStorage’
>
Hi,
On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
(https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were running
5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from 5.3.0 and
5.4.0 (see release notes)
One high level feature
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:04:09AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild
> > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> > rebuild. The following packages are failing:
> >
> > clementine
> > closure-com
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> > mozc:
> >
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> > error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base
> > ‘mozc::user_dictionary::User
On 23. 06. 20 8:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi Josh, Miro,
I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's
question is about "default modules" not "default streams"
(i.e. "modules enabled by default" vs. "the stream of a module to use
when a different one is not expl
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:03:31AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 06. 20 8:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Hi Josh, Miro,
> >
> >I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's
> >question is about "default modules" not "default streams"
> >(i.e. "modules enabled by
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 21:47 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>
> == Summary ==
> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
I am moving back this proposal.
I want to thank all of you for the feedback. I was surprised by lots
On 6/23/20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 15. 06. 20 v 21:47 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
>
> I am moving back this proposal.
>
> I want to thank all of
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We know within RHEL we have teams that will likely continue using
> default streams. We also know that some teams will not. Further we
> know that somes teams will likely not use modules at all, just as
> teams in RHEL 8 did not use mo
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:39 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:31 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Personally, I have long wanted burst-to-cloud or the ability for
> > others to donate hosts to the Fedora build system without having to
> > physically ship hardware. Koji is somewhat lim
On 23.06.2020 10:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> A tool which will give user a list of packages that can/should be removed.
dnf -C list extras
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:44 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > mozc:
> > >
> > > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> > > error
The package aqute-bnd version 4.3.0 has changed the license from (ASL
2.0, some parts being under EPL-2.0) to (ASL 2.0 or EPL-2.0).
As the package was built in as a part of module, the license should be
changed in this .spec file:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aqute-bnd/blob/stream-javapa
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from
> 5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes)
>
>
Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
>> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We
>> were running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug
>> fixes
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > The introduction
> > > > of default module streams
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a
> > rebuild
> > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> > rebuild. The following p
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > We know within RHEL we have teams that will likely continue using
> > default streams. We also know that some teams will not. Further we
> > know that somes team
On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
need to be handled too, there will be at least two paths.)
- (hypothetically) if we have default modules in eln, an
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
> >>singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
> >>need to be handled too, there will be at least
On 23. 06. 20 13:43, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
need to be handled
On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams despite
their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
reasoning behind it.
That's an interesting question. I think for the purposes of this
discussion, we sh
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 13:43, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
> (It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
> singula
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> >> despite
> >> their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
> >> reasoning behind it.
> >
> > T
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:24, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug f
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvem
Sorry, can't access your posted links.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:32, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
> >> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We
> >> were ru
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:12:09AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Jos
On 23. 06. 20 14:30, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams despite
their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
reasoning b
On 23. 06. 20 15:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
AFAIK Stephan and Igor
Sorry, I've meant Stephen.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2020, 12:41 + schrieb Martin Gansser:
> Sorry, can't access your posted links.
> Regards
> Martin
A solution for this problem was posted in one of the links by Jonathan
Wakely:
> I believe in most cases this can be fixed by changing
> to and adding "using boost::place
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 14:30, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> despite
> >
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> > >> despite
> > >> their failure in Fedora, whether thi
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200623.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:14 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default mod
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:31 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > What makes RHEL so different that the failure is not relevant to it? Is it
> > the
> > stable nature of RHEL content? Is it the limited scope of RHEL content? Is
> > it
> > the less "wi
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:31 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > What makes RHEL so different that the failure is not relevant to it? Is
> > > it the
> > > stable nature of RHEL content?
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200622.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200623.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 142
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 625.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi,
We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check),
orphan warnings, bugzillas, pull requests, active overrides and
updates - at a sin
On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 18:26 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using
> setuptools at
> buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This
> only works
> because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-
On 23. 06. 20 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically
said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and
not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be
no explicit mention, but the sample s
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> qemu amitshah berrange bonzini crobinso dwmw2 ehabkost
> jforbes lkundrak quintela rjones
This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/qemu/5.0.0
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
a member of. Everything is pretty self explanatory and in the long run
it is going to save us a l
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok
> We've been discussing this in the other thread about nodejs, but I
> figured I'd post this here. I've already taken mocha, and I plan to
> take the following 41 nodejs packages (at least temporarily...)--
> these appear to be the common dependencie
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log:
>
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/qemu/5.0.0/2.fc33/data/logs/...
>
> does not contain the substring /setupto/ anywhere. Nor does the
> ups
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 08:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:55:10AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > >> > > Hello Josh,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > you can change the artifact type while keeping interface the same and
> > >> > > it would be a _HUGE_ win because it would make m
Hello Fedora Community!
I would like to start a dedicated thread to focus on the “why” and use case
contexts to help clarify past and future decision making related to
Application Streams and Modularity. As I follow some of the Fedora mailing
list threads and Pagure issues, I have noticed a recen
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:33 PM clime wrote:
>
> So I don't really get even after almost five years where modularity is
> going or what it wants to achieve. I don't understand its use-case for
> any of Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS because disabling
> parallel-installability to allow parallel availabi
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:12 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
> made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
> quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
> a member of. Everything is
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 20:59, Terry Bowling wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:33 PM clime wrote:
>>
>>
>> So I don't really get even after almost five years where modularity is
>> going or what it wants to achieve. I don't understand its use-case for
>> any of Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS because
It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray
background. :(
https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote:
> >
> > We've been discussing this in the other thread about nodejs, but I
> > figured I'd post this here. I've already taken mocha, and I plan to
> > take the following 41 nodejs packa
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC232
== Summary ==
Switch glibc in Fedora 33 to glibc version 2.32.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:codonell|Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email: car...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.32 will be released at the beginning of
August 2
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS235
= Binutils 2.35 =
== Summary ==
Rebase the binutils package from version 2.34 to version 2.35.
== Owner ==
* Name: Nick Clifton [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nickc]
* Email: ni...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Switch the binuti
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonExtras
== Summary ==
The Python RPM dependency generator (that generates
python3.Xdist(foo) requirements) will be adapted to also
generate requirements on
[https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0508/#extras Python extras] (e.g.
python3.Xdist(foo[bar])) wh
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:15 PM Artem Tim wrote:
> It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray
> background. :(
> https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim
>
>
There were some caching/data consistency issues on the server due to
overload, I've manually fixed your pro
Thank you, that fixed the problem.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co
Yay, thanks a lot!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://
Hi there
Thanks for the clear posting.
I have updated dblatex with the BR in rawhide. I guess it's enough to trickle
this down to other branches when they need a rebuild anyways.
The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with
setuptools it by default does not, and th
CVC 1.8 is out, and it has a new dependency.
kissat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262
utop 2.6.0 is out and brings ocaml 4.11 compatibility with it, so
we'll need this version soon. It has a new dependency, which has a
new dependency, which has a new dependency:
ocaml-trie: h
As soon as the kissat review is done (see my previous email about
review swaps), I intend to build cvc4 1.8 in Rawhide, which entails an
soname bump. As far as I can tell, there are no consumers of cvc4's
library interface in Fedora, so no other builds are necessary.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jam
On 06/23/2020 09:28 AM, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
> service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
> data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check),
> orphan warnings, bugzil
Also from me a big thank you, this is very useful for getting a quick
overview!
Cheers,
Dan
Josef Skladanka writes:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
> service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
> data: FTBFS/FTI status
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit
> BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used.
> nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder
I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:53 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:29 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher <
> > > sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > The Node.js SIG is very loos
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:53 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:29 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher
On 23. 06. 20 21:58, Michael J Gruber wrote:
The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with setuptools it
by default does not, and the spec does not override the default. Is there a way to
specify this (other than patching out anything "setuptools" from the source)?
On 23. 06. 20 21:11, Ben Rosser wrote:
Thanks Miro, much appreciated!
You are welocme.
However, I am afraid I have some bad news. The recent report in
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt still mentions another 40 packages:
tc01: nodejs-optimist, nodejs-burrito, nodejs-cookiejar,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 21:11, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > Thanks Miro, much appreciated!
>
> You are welocme.
>
> However, I am afraid I have some bad news. The recent report in
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt still mentions another 40
>
On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
those could probably be safely retired. But looking at the orphans
report, I'm not confident I correctly separated out the d
On 24. 06. 20 1:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
those could probably be safely retired. But looking at the orphans
report, I'm not
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 24. 06. 20 1:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >> Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
> >> package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
> >> those coul
Nice!
Is the ourobolos (the snake eating its own tail) supposed to animate
all the time? To me, that kinda sorta means something is working - but
what? Hovering over it gives no clue.
Or should I just wait a bit longer for it to finish? (I already waited
a few minutes)
Cheers
Bob
On Wed, 24
On 6/23/20 5:35 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 23.06.2020 10:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
A tool which will give user a list of packages that can/should be removed.
dnf -C list extras
Nice, thanks for finding this --- but it also lists all the
debugsource/debuginfo packages, and for som
On 6/23/20 9:26 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
Hello everyone,
there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at
buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only
works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools.
We would li
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:17:10PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a
> > > rebuild
> > > of all dependencies and
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:31:06PM +0200, clime wrote:
> > The unanswered question is what mechanism would be used make sure that
> > the rpms from the "module" are all installed. One option would be to
> > somehow mangle rpm names, another option would be to add some kind of
> > Provides/Requires,
80 matches
Mail list logo
