Hello team,
Latest release of ispc failed to build due gcc=c++ related errors as
seen on scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45567484
Here is the source located on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ispc/
Patch welcome to fix the issue.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fe
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:02 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Latest release of ispc failed to build due gcc=c++ related errors as
> seen on scratch build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45567484
>
> Here is the source located on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rp
On 09/06/2020 08:54, Kalev Lember wrote:
The build failed with:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ispc-1.13.0/src/bitcode_lib.cpp: In member function 'void
BitcodeLib::print() const':
/builddir/build/BUILD/ispc-1.13.0/src/bitcode_lib.cpp:61:17: error: variable
'type' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-
On 2020-06-09 1:06 a.m., Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
It looks to be hard coded upstream:
https://github.com/ispc/ispc/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L355
so I suggest just adding to the spec:
sed -i 's| -Werror | |g' CMakeLists.txt
as is already being done for some other flags.
Tom
Thank
Am 09.06.20 um 02:03 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> I disagree. /etc should be prepopulated by packages and/or the distribution
> installer. Then the directory is left for the local admin to customize.
Not to speak of the fact, that you do not know which defaults are in
place, if they are not visible som
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin,
> potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought
> this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd,
> systemd-xdg-autostart-generator (you've got to be kidding with these
> generators..
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a
> short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when
> authentication wasn't yet working)
Doing a migration of the elections app in the middle of a voting period
sounds like very bad timing t
Dne 05. 06. 20 v 17:24 Tomas Orsava napsal(a):
> On 6/5/20 4:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 05. 06. 20 16:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> Hi,
> I thi
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
>
> Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
>
Those suffer from
1. the horrible bcond logic inversion that trips pretty much everyone
all the time.
2. the fa
Dne 09. 06. 20 v 12:12 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
> Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
>> Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
>>
> Those suffer from
> 1. the horrible bcond logic inversion
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:31 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a
> > short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when
> > authentication wasn't yet working)
>
> Doing a migration of the elections ap
On 09. 06. 20 11:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a
short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when
authentication wasn't yet working)
Doing a migration of the elections app in the middle of a votin
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:25 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin,
> > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought
> > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd,
> > systemd-xdg-autosta
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:21 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
> Dne 09. 06. 20 v 12:12 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
> > Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
> > > Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines
> > >
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#b
On 09. 06. 20 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
That won't be different for what was the original question here, i.e.
conditionally disable tests. bconds are what we have for better or worse.
And really, this seems about bootstrapping not disabling tests, which
are not completely different, but nobody c
Dne 09. 06. 20 v 13:33 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 09. 06. 20 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> That won't be different for what was the original question here, i.e.
>> conditionally disable tests. bconds are what we have for better or
>> worse.
>>
>> And really, this seems about bootstrapping not dis
On Di, 09.06.20 11:24, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
> John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin,
> > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought
> > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd,
> > syst
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
>
> The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked why,
> the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to handle
> bootstrapping.
> So shouldn't somebody spend time changing the test conditionals to
> bootstrapping condi
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:56 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
> >
> > The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked
> > why,
> > the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to handle
> > bootstrapping.
> > So should
> Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?)
> other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the
> systemd one for sure.
The zram-generator is probably more straightforward (with literally
less layers of indirection) than what the zram package
Please see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions
Please fix your packages according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild
Inidivdual packagers are being emailed with details
Maintainers by package
I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way.
In particular there are no *.ko files at all under that directory:
$ ls /li
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
>
> However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way.
Dear list,
I'm orphaning mnemosyne [1] as I don't have time to maintain it. It
lags[2] behind upstream a bit (2.6.1 vs. 2.7), but updating requires
packaging a few new dependencies. It's failing under Python 3.9, too[3].
First order fix is trivial (s/cElementTree/ElementTree/g'), but after
that ar
- Original Message -
> From: "Miro Hrončok"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Kevin Kofler"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:22:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration
>
> On 09. 06. 20 11:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:26:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a
> > short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when
> > authentication wasn't yet working)
>
> Doing a migration of the ele
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>
> The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at this
> point.
Can you elaborate?
Do you get an error? Does it not display? Does it not allow you to vote?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
On 09/06/20 00:02 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 18:27 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/05/20 09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on
> it, using the f33-boost side tag.
>
> If you see "Rebuilt for Boos
Hey Jiri,
Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding
the ant one but didn't succeed yet
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
> Please see
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Please see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions
> Please fix your packages according to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild
> Inidivdual packag
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:32 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
>
> Well, recent articles on LWN mention a spike in interest to hibernation¹, so
> I'd expect hibernation to get improved.
It's a start. They may also want to pick up the encrypted+signed work,
but for different reasons. In the cloud cas
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:54 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> So, I am testing ZRAM right now (as per your advice in another thread). All
> well
> so far, however reading this makes me think I gonna stumble upon a point where
> ZSRAM will be a better fit.
>
> You see, the idea of ZRAM and ZSWAP i
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > Please see
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions
> > Please fix your packages according to
> > https://fedoraproject.o
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> >
> > The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at
> this point.
>
> Can you elaborate?
>
> Do you get an error? Does it not display? Does it not al
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 15:05 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> I've installed kernel-5.8.0-
> 0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the
> host).
I can confirm that rawhide does not boot in a useful state right now
(no m
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
> >
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 08:57 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 08 juin 2020 à 09:48 -0600, Jeff Law a écrit :
> > I put faith in both the upstreams and packagers to do the right thing
> > for their project. Right now Fedora policy does exactly the opposite
> > by forcing everyone to use GCC
On 6/9/20 3:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:56 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked
why,
the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to h
Dne 06. 06. 20 v 12:52 Andy Mender napsal(a):
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
This is old version of "how to write simple SPEC file". Albeit, still valid.
Several times, I wanted to delete it as we now have:
https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/#hello-wo
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:17:13AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> I'd disagree, particularly around build systems and the compiler components
> within build systems. THere's always exceptions, but by in large I believe
> upstreams are in the best position to select the compiler toolchains.
Fedora routi
On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Hey Jiri,
> Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding the
> ant one but didn't
> succeed yet
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/
Hi!
I think I'm not guilty. it looks like fedora inf
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Hey Jiri,
> > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding
> > the ant one but didn't
> > succeed yet
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/pack
On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> Please see
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions
>>> Please fix your pac
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
>
> However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way.
> In part
On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?)
other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the
systemd one for sure.
The zram-generator is probably more straightforward (with literally
less layers of
On 6/9/20 1:43 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote:
And ZRAM is one of the tools, that should not be enabled by default
anyway. In a best case scenario it extends memory, but in most cases it
slows it down. With 16GB there isn't even a use-case for it.
It doesn't slow anything down. If you don't use it,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:44 AM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
>
> And ZRAM is one of the tools, that should not be enabled by default
> anyway. In a best case scenario it extends memory, but in most cases it
> slows it down. With 16GB there isn't even a use-case for it.
>
I don't think that can be said a
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
... snip
>
>
> The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at
> this point.
>
This is now fixed so you should be able to vote :-).
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Charalampos Stratakis
> Software Engineer
> Python Mainten
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:17 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
> >
> > However /lib/m
- Original Message -
> From: "Clement Verna"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Kevin Kofler"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 9:04:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis < cstra
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> >> Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?)
> >> other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the
> >> systemd one for sure.
> >
> > The zram
Hi Ankur,
Ankur Sinha writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need
> more people helping us out.
>
> The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the learning
> curve here is much more technical then a lot of other areas in Fedora.
> S
On 6/9/20 1:57 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?)
other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the
systemd
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:18:06PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/9/20 1:57 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > > > > Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4?
What's happened with koji?
CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'.
Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503).
Is it my own IP/provider problem?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 00:42 +0300, TI_Eugene wrote:
> What's happened with koji?
> CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'.
> Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503).
> Is it my own IP/provider problem?
The entire Fedora infrastructure is moving from one data center to
another. This h
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:42 PM TI_Eugene wrote:
>
> What's happened with koji?
Koji has a scheduled outage due to the
(well) documented datacenter move. At
any single point the services will be in
"interesting" operational modes.
___
devel mailing list
Oops, sorry, I forgot.
Thank you.
10.06.2020 00:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 00:42 +0300, TI_Eugene wrote:
What's happened with koji?
CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'.
Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503).
Is it my own IP/provider problem?
The entire
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 09:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:54 PM Konstantin Kharlamov <
> hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> > So, I am testing ZRAM right now (as per your advice in another
> > thread). All well
> > so far, however reading this makes me think I gonna stumble upo
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 2:24:02 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin,
> > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought
> > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd,
> > systemd-xd
> cinnamon-themes jcpunk, orphan 5 weeks ago
I use Cinnamon as the main DE on one of my machines, and the package doesn't
look like something that requires a lot of maintenance, so I'll take it.
___
devel mailing list
> > cinnamon-themes jcpunk, orphan 5
weeks ago
> I use Cinnamon as the main DE on one of my machines, and the package
> doesn't look like something that requires a lot of maintenance, so I'll take
> it.
...right, so I took a better look at the package. The rep
Hi,
after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build
with jdk-11, as the code contains deprecated API.
Reference here:
https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=99750
Best regards,
Ondrej
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:42 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini
Greetings everyone.
Just a quick recap of our day 2 datacenter move.
Today was the buildsystem and all it's assocated things.
* src.fedoraproject.org took longer than anticipated due to some
repeated syncs to make sure we got all the content bit for bit.
It's up now and should be working most
Ankur Sinha writes:
>> NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically supports 2
>> database formats: SQLite and DBM. The latter is considered legacy and
>> we switched the default database format to SQLite in F28[1]. Since then
>> I presume most of the applications have switched to the
On 6/10/20 8:14 AM, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build
> with jdk-11, as the code
> contains deprecated API.
that is sad. What is longterm goal of mysql-connector-java? You have to move
it to live with
java-1.8.0-openjdk-de
66 matches
Mail list logo