Need assistance to build ispc

2020-06-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, Latest release of ispc failed to build due gcc=c++ related errors as seen on scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45567484 Here is the source located on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ispc/ Patch welcome to fix the issue. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fe

Re: Need assistance to build ispc

2020-06-09 Thread Kalev Lember
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:02 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > Latest release of ispc failed to build due gcc=c++ related errors as > seen on scratch build: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45567484 > > Here is the source located on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rp

Re: Need assistance to build ispc

2020-06-09 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 09/06/2020 08:54, Kalev Lember wrote: The build failed with: /builddir/build/BUILD/ispc-1.13.0/src/bitcode_lib.cpp: In member function 'void BitcodeLib::print() const': /builddir/build/BUILD/ispc-1.13.0/src/bitcode_lib.cpp:61:17: error: variable 'type' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-

Re: Need assistance to build ispc

2020-06-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2020-06-09 1:06 a.m., Tom Hughes via devel wrote: It looks to be hard coded upstream:   https://github.com/ispc/ispc/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L355 so I suggest just adding to the spec:   sed -i 's| -Werror | |g' CMakeLists.txt as is already being done for some other flags. Tom Thank

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 09.06.20 um 02:03 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > I disagree. /etc should be prepopulated by packages and/or the distribution > installer. Then the directory is left for the local admin to customize. Not to speak of the fact, that you do not know which defaults are in place, if they are not visible som

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
John M. Harris Jr wrote: > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin, > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd, > systemd-xdg-autostart-generator (you've got to be kidding with these > generators..

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a > short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when > authentication wasn't yet working) Doing a migration of the elections app in the middle of a voting period sounds like very bad timing t

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 05. 06. 20 v 17:24 Tomas Orsava napsal(a): > On 6/5/20 4:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 05. 06. 20 16:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote: > Hi, > I thi

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping > Those suffer from 1. the horrible bcond logic inversion that trips pretty much everyone all the time. 2. the fa

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 09. 06. 20 v 12:12 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : >> Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping >> > Those suffer from > 1. the horrible bcond logic inversion

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Leigh Griffin
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:31 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a > > short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when > > authentication wasn't yet working) > > Doing a migration of the elections ap

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 06. 20 11:26, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when authentication wasn't yet working) Doing a migration of the elections app in the middle of a votin

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:25 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin, > > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought > > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd, > > systemd-xdg-autosta

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:21 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > Dne 09. 06. 20 v 12:12 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > > Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 12:08 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > > Just FTR, we have bootstrapping guidelines > > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#b

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 06. 20 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote: That won't be different for what was the original question here, i.e. conditionally disable tests. bconds are what we have for better or worse. And really, this seems about bootstrapping not disabling tests, which are not completely different, but nobody c

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 09. 06. 20 v 13:33 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 09. 06. 20 12:21, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> That won't be different for what was the original question here, i.e. >> conditionally disable tests. bconds are what we have for better or >> worse. >> >> And really, this seems about bootstrapping not dis

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 09.06.20 11:24, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote: > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin, > > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought > > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd, > > syst

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked why, > the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to handle > bootstrapping. > So shouldn't somebody spend time changing the test conditionals to > bootstrapping condi

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:56 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > > > The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked > > why, > > the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to handle > > bootstrapping. > > So should

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-09 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?) > other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the > systemd one for sure. The zram-generator is probably more straightforward (with literally less layers of indirection) than what the zram package

500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions Please fix your packages according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild Inidivdual packagers are being emailed with details Maintainers by package

Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host). However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way. In particular there are no *.ko files at all under that directory: $ ls /li

Re: Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host). > > However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way.

orphaning mnemosyne

2020-06-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Dear list, I'm orphaning mnemosyne [1] as I don't have time to maintain it. It lags[2] behind upstream a bit (2.6.1 vs. 2.7), but updating requires packaging a few new dependencies. It's failing under Python 3.9, too[3]. First order fix is trivial (s/cElementTree/ElementTree/g'), but after that ar

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Kevin Kofler" > > Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:22:18 PM > Subject: Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration > > On 09. 06. 20 11:26, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:26:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The openshift apps move caused a outage for the elections app (both a > > short one while it was entirely down, and another short time when > > authentication wasn't yet working) > > Doing a migration of the ele

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at this > point. Can you elaborate? Do you get an error? Does it not display? Does it not allow you to vote? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP sig

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-06-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 09/06/20 00:02 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 18:27 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28/05/20 09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on > it, using the f33-boost side tag. > > If you see "Rebuilt for Boos

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
Hey Jiri, Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding the ant one but didn't succeed yet https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/ On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > Please see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > Please fix your packages according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild > Inidivdual packag

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:32 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > Well, recent articles on LWN mention a spike in interest to hibernation¹, so > I'd expect hibernation to get improved. It's a start. They may also want to pick up the encrypted+signed work, but for different reasons. In the cloud cas

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:54 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > So, I am testing ZRAM right now (as per your advice in another thread). All > well > so far, however reading this makes me think I gonna stumble upon a point where > ZSRAM will be a better fit. > > You see, the idea of ZRAM and ZSWAP i

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Please see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > > Please fix your packages according to > > https://fedoraproject.o

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > > > The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at > this point. > > Can you elaborate? > > Do you get an error? Does it not display? Does it not al

Re: Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 15:05 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > I've installed kernel-5.8.0- > 0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the > host). I can confirm that rawhide does not boot in a useful state right now (no m

Re: Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but > > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host). > >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-09 Thread Jeff Law
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 08:57 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 08 juin 2020 à 09:48 -0600, Jeff Law a écrit : > > I put faith in both the upstreams and packagers to do the right thing > > for their project. Right now Fedora policy does exactly the opposite > > by forcing everyone to use GCC

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Let's standardize the way to disable tests during RPM build?

2020-06-09 Thread Tomas Orsava
On 6/9/20 3:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:56 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 14:35 +0200, Vít Ondruch a écrit : The proposal was to optionally disable test. When somebody asked why, the answer was bootstrapping. But we know how to h

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

2020-06-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 06. 06. 20 v 12:52 Andy Mender napsal(a): > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package This is old version of "how to write simple SPEC file". Albeit, still valid. Several times, I wanted to delete it as we now have: https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/#hello-wo

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-09 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:17:13AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > I'd disagree, particularly around build systems and the compiler components > within build systems. THere's always exceptions, but by in large I believe > upstreams are in the best position to select the compiler toolchains. Fedora routi

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > Hey Jiri, > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding the > ant one but didn't > succeed yet > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/package/ant/ Hi! I think I'm not guilty. it looks like fedora inf

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Hey Jiri, > > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding > > the ant one but didn't > > succeed yet > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/pack

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >>> Please see >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions >>> Please fix your pac

Re: Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Justin Forbes
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host). > > However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way. > In part

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?) other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the systemd one for sure. The zram-generator is probably more straightforward (with literally less layers of

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/9/20 1:43 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: And ZRAM is one of the tools, that should not be enabled by default anyway. In a best case scenario it extends memory, but in most cases it slows it down. With 16GB there isn't even a use-case for it. It doesn't slow anything down. If you don't use it,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:44 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > And ZRAM is one of the tools, that should not be enabled by default > anyway. In a best case scenario it extends memory, but in most cases it > slows it down. With 16GB there isn't even a use-case for it. > I don't think that can be said a

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: ... snip > > > The elections app seems to be broken for me though, so I can't vote at > this point. > This is now fixed so you should be able to vote :-). > > -- > Regards, > > Charalampos Stratakis > Software Engineer > Python Mainten

Re: Something weird with modules in kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread Justin Forbes
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:17 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but > > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host). > > > > However /lib/m

Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration

2020-06-09 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Clement Verna" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Kevin Kofler" > Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 9:04:43 PM > Subject: Re: Day one of the datacenter service migration > > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:29, Charalampos Stratakis < cstra

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-09 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > >> Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?) > >> other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the > >> systemd one for sure. > > > > The zram

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

2020-06-09 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Ankur, Ankur Sinha writes: > Hi folks, > > The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need > more people helping us out. > > The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the learning > curve here is much more technical then a lot of other areas in Fedora. > S

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/9/20 1:57 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4? 5?) other zram implementations. It seems a bit more straightforward than the systemd

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-09 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:18:06PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/9/20 1:57 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > > On 6/9/20 6:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > > > Well, that's really the point. The one you're using is one of the (4?

Koji oops?

2020-06-09 Thread TI_Eugene
What's happened with koji? CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'. Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503). Is it my own IP/provider problem? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..

Re: Koji oops?

2020-06-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 00:42 +0300, TI_Eugene wrote: > What's happened with koji? > CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'. > Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503). > Is it my own IP/provider problem? The entire Fedora infrastructure is moving from one data center to another. This h

Re: Koji oops?

2020-06-09 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:42 PM TI_Eugene wrote: > > What's happened with koji? Koji has a scheduled outage due to the (well) documented datacenter move. At any single point the services will be in "interesting" operational modes. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Koji oops?

2020-06-09 Thread TI_Eugene
Oops, sorry, I forgot. Thank you. 10.06.2020 00:44, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 00:42 +0300, TI_Eugene wrote: What's happened with koji? CLI get 'AuthError: unable to obtain a session'. Host koji.fedoraproject.org seems down (503). Is it my own IP/provider problem? The entire

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 09:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:54 PM Konstantin Kharlamov < > hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > So, I am testing ZRAM right now (as per your advice in another > > thread). All well > > so far, however reading this makes me think I gonna stumble upo

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 2:24:02 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > I wonder if we could get that masked in Fedora Server and KDE Spin, > > potentially along with homed, userdb, repart (Who in the world thought > > this was a good idea?), resolved, networkd, > > systemd-xd

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-06-09 Thread Artur Iwicki
> cinnamon-themes jcpunk, orphan 5 weeks ago I use Cinnamon as the main DE on one of my machines, and the package doesn't look like something that requires a lot of maintenance, so I'll take it. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-06-09 Thread Artur Iwicki
> > cinnamon-themes jcpunk, orphan 5 weeks ago > I use Cinnamon as the main DE on one of my machines, and the package > doesn't look like something that requires a lot of maintenance, so I'll take > it. ...right, so I took a better look at the package. The rep

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Ondrej Dubaj
Hi, after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build with jdk-11, as the code contains deprecated API. Reference here: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=99750 Best regards, Ondrej On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:42 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini

Datacenter move day 2

2020-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings everyone. Just a quick recap of our day 2 datacenter move. Today was the buildsystem and all it's assocated things. * src.fedoraproject.org took longer than anticipated due to some repeated syncs to make sure we got all the content bit for bit. It's up now and should be working most

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-06-09 Thread Daiki Ueno
Ankur Sinha writes: >> NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically supports 2 >> database formats: SQLite and DBM. The latter is considered legacy and >> we switched the default database format to SQLite in F28[1]. Since then >> I presume most of the applications have switched to the

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

2020-06-09 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/10/20 8:14 AM, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hi, > > after discussion with upstream mysql-connector-java is not able to be build > with jdk-11, as the code > contains deprecated API. that is sad. What is longterm goal of mysql-connector-java? You have to move it to live with java-1.8.0-openjdk-de