No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:31:25PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> My question now is how can we determine what is meant to be
> executable by system applications vs examples and other cruft? (This might be
> relevant to people minimizing systems/containers.)
Theoretically the examples are a documen
Dear all,
there is nothing to announce, and nothing on the meeting agenda. Some
tickets are in progress, but I think we should continue the discussion
in tickets.
I propose to cancel today's meeting. If there's something urgent, we can
still hold it.
@nirik: maybe you could provide your weekly d
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:00 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 7:48 PM James Cassell
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit :
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:48:53PM -0500, Parker Gibson wrote:
> The issue I see is that no package management system I know of handles
> multiple so versions, they explicitly state packages conflict with
> each-other even if in principle the so versioning means they would not.
Gentoo portage when
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:14:14PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> The scheme you are proposing is kind-of used for Java and Go, and is
> sometimes known as 'vendoring' because it allows publishing software in
> complete dependency bundles independent of anything else. It works as long
Hi Sandro,
I have not been able to solve the problem so far.
The file QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc is simply not created and I don't know how
to change it to libqxt-libqxt-eaf6872f6ad4/qt5/src/designer/Makefile, if that's
the right place.
Regards
Martin
Hello,
as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in
json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and
pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4]
The update for F32 is already in stable, but the updates for the earlier
releases are still in waiting to be tested, an
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 604589 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/604589
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
builds for borgbackup done (finally):
- borgbackup-1.1.11-3.el7
- borgbackup-1.1.11-5.fc31
Please add these once you submit the final update.
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
On 24/05/2020 19:56, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> "These directories are defined below the placeholder file system $BOOT. This
> placeholder file system shall be determined during installation time, and an
> fstab entry for it shall be created mounting it to /boot. The installer
> program sh
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:17:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> there is nothing to announce, and nothing on the meeting agenda. Some
> tickets are in progress, but I think we should continue the discussion
> in tickets.
>
> I propose to cancel today's meeting. If the
Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> Hello,
>
> as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in
> json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and
> pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4]
>
> The update for F32 is already in s
I made builds for R-argon2 last night as well, which you can include
in your update.
- R-argon2-0.2.0-7.fc31
Actually, there's no need for a _new_ update; you can just edit the
existing one.
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 08:41, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
>
> builds for borgbackup done (finally):
> - borgb
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200524.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200525.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 178.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all.
Some packages has string
...
And appstream-util validate-relax show error
? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
There exist bugreport one year old!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
Please pay attention to it.
No I don't know what to do:
1. Remove this str
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:31 PM Vascom wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Some packages has string
> ...
> And appstream-util validate-relax show error
> ? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid
>
> There exist bugreport one year old!
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944
>
>
> Please
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Verga via devel writes:
> Hi all,
>
> now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
> tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like
> to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets
> listed as new, many
On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider
moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose
using the side ta
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider
> > > > moving
First I'd like to thanks people that made me realize I was confusing the
GPT's partition type GUID and GPT's Unique partition GUID. And to also
mention the filesystem UID.
Because Fedora choose not to apply the BLS partition type GUID or BLS
MBR type id, I believe we generate the following con
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
23 matches
Mail list logo
