No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
After seeing multiple ways to find packages that need rebuilding after a
SONAME update and having asked once or twice for someone (smarter than me)
to document a best practice, I gave up on waiting and took a shot at it:
I'm sure lots of improvements can be made but it "works"...
$ cat fed-needs-
On 08. 05. 20 22:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
When we wrote that, there was still ambiguity regarding whether DNF
would have implemented the necessary upgrade capabilities we've been
discussing for the last six months.
Just to clarify: DNF upgrade capabilities are not the thing that is holding
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 3:51:44 PM MST Chris Adams wrote:
> Now that Fedora 32 has fstrim.timer enabled by default...
Remember, only in Workstation.
> how about discards for the things that fstrim doesn't get? Two main things
> I know of:
>
> - swap: Do discard at swapon time by setting "dis
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
Let's be realistic. The command they run is 'python', 'python2' or 'python3'.
Sure, it's a symlink, but that's what users actually type to be executed.
--
John M.
On Friday, May 8, 2020 7:24:14 AM MST Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.
>
> There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
> necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.
I noticed this as well, a
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:57 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
>
> Let's be realistic. The command they run is 'python', 'python2' or 'python3'.
> Sure, it's a symlin
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200508.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200509.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.55 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
Let's be realistic. The command they run is 'python', 'python2' or 'python3'.
Sure, it's a symlink, but that's what u
On Saturday, May 9, 2020 2:40:02 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
> >
> >
> > Let's be realistic. The comma
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:09 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 9, 2020 2:40:02 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > >> The command that the user executes is "py
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200508.0):
ID: 595133 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/595133
--
Mail generated b
Hello all,
I've been trying to get python-flask-babel[0] updated to v1.0.0 via
PR[1]. Unfortunately, pcpa hasn't been responding to pings in the PR
or emails.
I've also filed the requisite non-responsive maintainer check bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833723
Does anyone know h
On Sat, 2020-05-09 at 10:34 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> After seeing multiple ways to find packages that need rebuilding
> after a SONAME update and having asked once or twice for someone
> (smarter than me) to document a best practice, I gave up on waiting
> and took a shot at it:
> I'm sure lots
14 matches
Mail list logo
