Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)

2020-04-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 04. 20 19:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >>I don't agree that "python3.9" as a package name annoys humans or > >>break automation scripts. How does it? > >As soon as you have a different naming convention for numeric and non > >n

[Test-Announce] Taskotron is EOL today

2020-04-30 Thread Kamil Paral
As previously announced [1], Taskotron [2] will be shut down today. See the announcement and its discussion for more details and some background info. As a result, certain tests (beginning with “dist.“) will no longer appear for new updates in Bodhi (in Automated Tests tab). Some of those tests (a

Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)

2020-04-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le jeudi 30 avril 2020 à 00:38 +0200, Miro Hrončok a écrit : > > My sentence was about "python3.9" not being more annoying than > "python-3.9". > > I wonder, why do you consider periods in names confusing? … > jboss-jsf-2.1-api Another example where the hyphen helps reading. The version is mid

Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)

2020-04-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le jeudi 30 avril 2020 à 10:03 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > Clever “it’s obvious in the few cases we imagine today, we do not > need a clean version separator” syntaxes fail hard once exposed to > the real world. Also, to get back to the original subject, the whole python package renaming

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:39:20PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 7:19 AM, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > Details in the gist: > > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408 > > How about s/use/globalbuildopt/ ? > It's awfully long concatenation of two word

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200430.0 compose check report

2020-04-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)

2020-04-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le jeudi 30 avril 2020 à 10:03 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > Old human languages did not use word separators like space in > writing, because "everyone knew" where one word started and the next > finished. Even scholars that spent their life studying one of those > past civilizations find t

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Šabata
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:40 AM clime wrote: > > Few more notes: > > I think an idea that build system could be simply passing > --with/--without options on mock's command-line should be > considered...then basically no change in spec files is needed (i.e. no > syntax change). Yes but I'd say suc

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Šabata
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > (2) Is it possible to override them on a per-package basis? > > > > > > E.g. I have ncurses in global.yaml: > > > > > >

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Šabata
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:55 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le mardi 28 avril 2020 à 08:43 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit : > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > > > %_use_ncurses %{lua: > > > if rpm.expand("%{name}") == "yourpackage1" > > > or rpm.expand("

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Šabata
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 7:19 AM, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > Details in the gist: > > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408 > > How about s/use/globalbuildopt/ ? Please, no :) The reason I went with "use" is because

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200430.0 compose check report

2020-04-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200430.0 compose check report

2020-04-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 589461 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/589461 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop

2020-04-30 Thread Michal Schorm
Hi, A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1] Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened it and moved against F32. How can I get someone appropriate to notice it? The generic "Assignee: Alternative GTK desktop environments"

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:43:51AM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > (2) Is it possible to override them on a per-packag

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-30 Thread Vít Ondruch
Will this work with modules? There is the context already increased for every build ... Vít Dne 09. 04. 20 v 15:43 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > Good Morning Everyone, > > You may remember that Nils, Adam and pingou have been investigating what > it would take to get rid of maintaining the ch

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > packages. > > However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le jeudi 30 avril 2020 à 10:49 +0200, Petr Šabata a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:55 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: > > Le mardi 28 avril 2020 à 08:43 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit : > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > %_use_ncurses %{lua: > > > > if

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for sure > > that the package should be retired, pl

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:18 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:05 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > Perhaps there are other reasons, like some third party software not > > working on F32, for example. I'm generally curious about how people > > actually use our distributions an

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM Ty Young wrote: > > > On 4/29/20 8:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Sure, that's valid. Although for installations contained to just > > Fedora content, the upgrade from release to release has been downright > > boring (that's a good thing). It's almost equivalent to

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Alex Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Josh Boyer" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Florian Muellner" > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 9:04:12 PM > Subject: Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31? > > > Just a curious observation/question. Backports can often be time

WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall

2020-04-30 Thread Luke Hinds
Hey All, Trying to update a package and getting failures over: ~~~ WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall for handling setup_requires/test_requires; this is deprecated and will be removed in a future version. Download error on https://pypi.org/simple/pbr/: [Errno

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Martin Jackson
I've successfully moved from F31 to F32 = on 5 desktops (which I run KVM on), 2 laptops and another 11 VMs that run on the desktops (monitoring, mail IPA servers, firewalls).  I run with rpmfusion and BTRFS a for my main storage machine nd f32 has been an absolute delight for me.  But:  I don't

Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall

2020-04-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 09:59, Luke Hinds wrote: > > Hey All, > > Trying to update a package and getting failures over: > > ~~~ > > WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall for > handling setup_requires/test_requires; this is deprecated and will be removed > in a fut

Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop

2020-04-30 Thread L S
> Hi, > > A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group > @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1] > Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened it and moved > against F32. > > How can I get someone appropriate to notice it? > The generic Try assigning it to the right c

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Ty Young
On 4/30/20 7:37 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM Ty Young wrote: On 4/29/20 8:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Sure, that's valid. Although for installations contained to just Fedora content, the upgrade from release to release has been downright boring (that's a good thing).

Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall

2020-04-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 at 15:51, Luke Hinds wrote: > Hey All, > > Trying to update a package and getting failures over: > > ~~~ > > WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall for > handling setup_requires/test_requires; this is deprecated and will be > removed in

rpminspect Copr repo location

2020-04-30 Thread David Cantrell
For anyone using/testing/contributing to rpminspect and using the Copr builds, please make sure you are using the correct repo. I renamed my Fedora Account to align with my Red Hat internal account name change (dcantrel -> dcantrell). My old Fedora account is still there, but I am not using it.

Re: Taskotron is EOL today

2020-04-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 04. 20 9:59, Kamil Paral wrote: As previously announced [1], Taskotron [2] will be shut down today. See the announcement and its discussion for more details and some background info. As a result, certain tests (beginning with “dist.“) will no longer appear for new updates in Bodhi (in A

Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop

2020-04-30 Thread Dan Book
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:34 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > Hi, > > A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group > @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1] > Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened it and moved > against F32. > > How can I get someone appropriate to noti

Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?

2020-04-30 Thread Florian Müllner
Hey, On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 09:30, Alex Scheel wrote: And yeah, agreed. Backports are time consuming. But this is F31, not F30. There's at least another 6 months of support on this distro (technically...) and as referenced on that ticket, I'm not the only one that has hit it; there's ab

Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall

2020-04-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.04.2020 15:51, Luke Hinds wrote: > Has anyone seen this before, why would it not be able to find pip. You cannot use pip/npm/gems in official builds. You must use packaged versions of such dependencies. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-04-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello fellow java package maintainers! We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for F33. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Short Story: * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide * Ensure your package

F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk

2020-04-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello fellow java package maintainers! We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for F33. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 Short Story: * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide * Ensure your package bu

Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop

2020-04-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:34 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group > > @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1] > > Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened i

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > > packa

Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron is EOL today

2020-04-30 Thread clime
R.I.P Taskotron On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 10:01, Kamil Paral wrote: > > As previously announced [1], Taskotron [2] will be shut down today. See the > announcement and its discussion for more details and some background info. > > As a result, certain tests (beginning with “dist.“) will no longer app

Re: Proposal to enable spec file preprocessing step before srpm build

2020-04-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 00:26 +0100, clime a écrit : Hi, > the code would fail because at that point, the > git metadata is already missing (they are not included in srpms). Can’t storage of built-time information in srpms be fixed instead of adding a whole new overlay over existing tools, that

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-30 Thread clime
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 10:40, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:40 AM clime wrote: > > > > Few more notes: > > > > I think an idea that build system could be simply passing > > --with/--without options on mock's command-line should be > > considered...then basically no change in sp

Flock to Fedora --> Nest with Fedora!

2020-04-30 Thread Marie Nordin
Hey folks, I know everyone has been wondering about if Flock to Fedora will be happening this year. The answer is yes, though we are going virtual with an alternate version: Nest with Fedora! How and what we do is open to community input. Check out this blog post on the Community Blog, which incl

Re: Proposal to enable spec file preprocessing step before srpm build

2020-04-30 Thread clime
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:40, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 00:26 +0100, clime a écrit : > > Hi, > > > the code would fail because at that point, the > > git metadata is already missing (they are not included in srpms). > > Can’t storage of built-time information in

Re: Flock to Fedora --> Nest with Fedora!

2020-04-30 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On 4/30/20 12:33 PM, Marie Nordin wrote: Hey folks, I know everyone has been wondering about if Flock to Fedora will be happening this year. The answer is yes, though we are going virtual with an alternate version: Nest with Fedora! This is awesome! Could we get Google Nest to sponsor? ;)

REMINDER: Fedora 30 EOL on 2020-05-26

2020-04-30 Thread Ben Cotton
Per the Fedora Release Lifecycle[1], Fedora 30 will reach end-of-life four weeks after the release of Fedora 32. This is Tuesday 26 May 2020. After this date, no more updates will be available for Fedora 30. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained

Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi all, Adam Williamson suggested I stick a note in the mailing list saying “hi” - so I’ve achieved that and officially upgraded myself from lurker! He also suggested I take questions from the community - and I’m very happy to do that. So - if there are any questions from Fedora developers on th

[Bug 1744419] Replace /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd by systemctl

2020-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744419 --- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 30 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 30 on 2020-05-26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Ben Cotton
And Mark will be the guest at the next Fedora Council video meeting on 13 May. See the wiki[1] for more details. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Council/Video_Meetings -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Mark, On 4/30/20 2:18 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: Hi all, Adam Williamson suggested I stick a note in the mailing list saying “hi” - so I’ve achieved that and officially upgraded myself from lurker! He also suggested I take questions from the community - and I’m very happy to do that. Welco

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 09:18:10PM +, Mark Pearson wrote: > Hi all, > > Adam Williamson suggested I stick a note in the mailing list saying > “hi” - so I’ve achieved that and officially upgraded myself from > lurker! He also suggested I take questions from the community - and > I’m very happy

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 30.04.2020, 21:18 + schrieb Mark Pearson: > Hi all, > > Adam Williamson suggested I stick a note in the mailing list saying > “hi” - so I’ve achieved that and officially upgraded myself from > lurker! He also suggested I take questions from the community - and > I’m very ha

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Zachary Snyder
Hi Mark, Thanks for reaching out to the mailing list. Not sure if this is the appropriate place for this email but I was wondering if fingerprint scanner support will be added in updates some how? I am running fedora 32 gnome on a Lenovo Thinkpad X1 carbon 6th gen Cheers, Zach On Thu, Apr 30, 2

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:37:41PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > My first question regarding Lenovo support for Fedora is: > > Will there be any working driver or any other kind of support from > Lenovo for the "Intel Corporation XMM7360 LTE Advanced Modem" aka. > Fibocom L850-GL LT

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:18:10 PM EDT Mark Pearson wrote: > He also suggested I take questions from the community I Mark. Which Lenovo model do I want to replace my XPS-13? -- Garry T. Williams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi Tomasz, > From: Tomasz Torcz > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:33 PM > > Hi, welcome among regular folks ;) > > I was wondering, will Lenovo work to make older models fully > supported, too? I'm looking at fingeprint reader on my T480s… I'd have to check what device is on the T480s (

RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi Björn and Solomon, > -Original Message- > From: Solomon Peachy > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:50 PM > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:37:41PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > My first question regarding Lenovo support for Fedora is: > > > > Will there be any working driver

RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Pearson
> -Original Message- > From: Garry T. Williams > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 6:00 PM > > On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:18:10 PM EDT Mark Pearson wrote: > > He also suggested I take questions from the community > > I Mark. Which Lenovo model do I want to replace my XPS-13? > I really

Re: python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide

2020-04-30 Thread Lumir Balhar
On 4/29/20 10:50 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On ke, 29 huhti 2020, Lumir Balhar wrote: On 4/29/20 10:31 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: Hi Lumir, On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:35:43 +0200 Lumir Balhar wrote: Hello. I'd like to switch python-dns crypto backend from pycryptodomex and ecdsa to python-crypt

Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Joe Doss
On 4/30/20 10:10 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: > As a note - if you do have the 00bd device: firmware is on LVFS but it's in > testing state (should be released really soon). If you do enable > lvfs-testing > and do an update to get it installed then fingerprints should work with F32 > (they did for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-30 Thread Markku Korkeala
On 4/30/20 3:12 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Markku Korkeala > wrote: >> >> On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know >>>