Le mardi 28 avril 2020 à 08:43 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > %_use_ncurses %{lua:
> > if rpm.expand("%{name}") == "yourpackage1"
> > or rpm.expand("%{name}") == "yourpackage2" then
> > print(rpm.expand("%{bcond_with foo}%{wit
On 4/27/20 5:33 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
Details in the gist:
https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408
I'm very interested in overriding the global settings:
On 4/28/20 10:53 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
Le mardi 28 avril 2020 à 08:43 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
%_use_ncurses %{lua:
if rpm.expand("%{name}") == "yourpackage1"
or rpm.expand("%{name}") == "yourpackage2" then
pr
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi folks,
We've already started to see Fedora 32 related questions on Ask Fedora.
May I please request you to look at AskFedora and answer questions when
possible, perhaps when you take short breaks from work?
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him
Dave Love wrote:
> As far as I can tell, it doesn't do dynamic dispatch. Experimentally,
> if you build with -mavx2 and run on ivybridge (or for skx and run on
> haswell), the test code generates illegal instruction errors. It's some
> time ago since I looked at it, and I don't remember, but that
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 588191 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/588191
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200423.1):
ID: 588192 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/588192
ID: 588193 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso i
Teletypewriter Installer
A Teletypewriter (TTY) Installer is a professional who installs and repairs
telegraphic transmitting and receiving equipment. A teletypewriter is known as
an electromechanical typewriter meant for point-to-point communication.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor and St
VMware NSX Engineer
The VMware NSX Engineer is an IT professional trained to effectively integrate
and implement the VMware NSX security platform within a hybrid cloud
infrastructure. The NSX Engineer must provide expertise in all aspects of
network technology security for a VMware virtualized e
It’s here! We’re proud to announce the release of Fedora 32.
Thanks to the hard work of thousands of Fedora community
members and contributors, we’re celebrating yet another
on-time release!
Read the official announcement at:
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-32/
or just go ahead a
>Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>Dave Love wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, it doesn't do dynamic dispatch. Experimentally,
>> if you build with -mavx2 and run on ivybridge (or for skx and run on
>> haswell), the test code generates illegal instruction errors. It's some
>> time ago since I looked at it, and
Hi Matthew,
> From: Matthew Miller
>
> It’s here! We’re proud to announce the release of Fedora 32.
> Thanks to the hard work of thousands of Fedora community members and
> contributors, we’re celebrating yet another on-time release!
>
> Read the official announcement at:
>
> * https://fedoram
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM wrote:
>
> I noticed Jam is missing from the labs even though the ISO built and
> everything was fine for the beta. Is this an oversight?
>
> I already replied privately, but for public reference, this is an
oversight. I'll get it fixed shortly:
https://pagure.io/
Hi,
The Workstation Working Group would like to solicit feedback on three
outstanding Workstation issues:
* fedora-workstation#54, "Default disk partitioning layout for
Workstation" [1][2]
* fedora-workstation#82, "encryption of user data (excludes system)"
[3][4]
* fedora-workstation#136, "
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200428.0):
ID: 588540 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/588540
ID: 588541 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso insta
Hallo
official Release statement isn't out yet, but I say thanks for another
nice Fedora release to *all* people made F32 happen.
Running F32 since beta was released without bugs on an pure Intel box.
- some very minor though, but ... -
nice !
stay healthy
--
sixpack13
_
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 10:18 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Workstation Working Group would like to solicit feedback on three
> outstanding Workstation issues:
>
> * fedora-workstation#54, "Default disk partitioning layout for
> Workstation" [1][2]
> * fedora-workstation#82, "en
Hi,
Almost a week ago, I built cmpfit and fityk in side tags on F31, F32
and F33. While the builds for F33 moved directly to stable - as
expected - the other two got stuck for 4 days. I noticed that I could
push them manually to testing, which I did a little over two days ago,
but they seem to be
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200426.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200428.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 93
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.83 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:41, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Almost a week ago, I built cmpfit and fityk in side tags on F31, F32
> and F33. While the builds for F33 moved directly to stable - as
> expected - the other two got stuck for 4 days. I noticed that I
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 16:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> It’s here! We’re proud to announce the release of Fedora 32.
> Thanks to the hard work of thousands of Fedora community
> members and contributors, we’re celebrating yet another
> on-time release!
>
> Read the official announcement at:
>
> *
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:37 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I have a hard time commenting over the next 2 becuse it seem like the
> probelm is not just technical, but there is no clear vision of whether
> there is one and only one solution or if multiple solutions need to be
> considered.
The short te
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 13:18 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:37 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I have a hard time commenting over the next 2 becuse it seem like the
> > probelm is not just technical, but there is no clear vision of whether
> > there is one and only one solution or
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33Boost173
== Summary ==
This change brings Boost 1.73 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships with a
recent upstream Boost release.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jwakely| Jonathan Wakely]]
* Email: jwak...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The aim is to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:01:31AM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Sérgio Basto writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> GConf2
> >
> > GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ?
>
> GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afa
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> It’s here! We’re proud to announce the release of Fedora 32.
> Thanks to the hard work of thousands of Fedora community
> members and contributors, we’re celebrating yet another
> on-time release!
>
> Read the official announcement at:
>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> So in the end I do not believe you can come up with a single schema for
> "workstation" unless you narrow down the scope of workstation to a
> smaller set of use cases to the exclusion of the others.
I think it's okay to do just that. W
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:18 pm, Chris Murphy
wrote:
This is the dilemma. It necessarily needs a single schema, there is
only one default. Customizations aren't going away.
We're not trying to come up with something that works perfectly for
everyone. We're just trying to come up with a defaul
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:54 pm, Alan wrote:
How do I switch desktops from gdm? switchdesk does not seem to work
and
the control on the login screen seems to have gone away.
It's moved to the bottom-right corner of the login screen now.
___
devel m
On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...]
> I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry
> which we use in the Xfce spin.
I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE.
> Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership
> to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:51:57PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> If the threat model is just stolen/lost laptop/disk then encrypting the
> user data only would be sufficient.
Strictly speaking I'd say /etc/shadow, /var/lib/{pgsql,mysql}/,
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ and /etc/NetworkManager/ are
a
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 16:23 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:18 pm, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> > This is the dilemma. It necessarily needs a single schema, there is
> > only one default. Customizations aren't going away.
>
> We're not trying to come up with something that
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry
> > which we use in the Xfce spin.
>
> I care about blueberry as well, even tho
Now that Fedora 32 has fstrim.timer enabled by default... how about
discards for the things that fstrim doesn't get? Two main things I know
of:
- swap: Do discard at swapon time by setting "discard=once" in
/etc/fstab would be somewhat similar to the periodic fstrim call. I
don't know how mu
There was a failed build of ckermit for F32 back in early February by releng
[1], and I don't see any later attempts for F32. There is a successful build
for ckermit for F33 from yesterday [2].
I'd like to request a rebuild for F32. Is it sufficient to request that here,
or is there some oth
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:52 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 13:18 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Long term, many solutions need to be considered. And not only
> > technical, but their impact on release engineering.
>
> What is the goal ?
>
> If the goal is just making it easy later
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Now that Fedora 32 has fstrim.timer enabled by default... how about
> discards for the things that fstrim doesn't get? Two main things I know
> of:
>
> - swap: Do discard at swapon time by setting "discard=once" in
> /etc/fstab would be so
And thank you for taking care of this.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Hello.
I'd like to switch python-dns crypto backend from pycryptodomex and
ecdsa to python-cryptography. Upstream already did the same in master
branch: https://github.com/rthalley/dnspython/pull/449
But, because python2-cryptography is not available in Fedora anymore,
this change will disab
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 15:58 +, sixpack13 wrote:
> Hallo
>
> official Release statement isn't out yet, but I say thanks for
> another
> nice Fedora release to *all* people made F32 happen.
Seconded. Thanks all for making this.
BK
___
devel mailin
42 matches
Mail list logo
